Jump to content

Matusz speaks


stef

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Huh, I actually read this interview and came away feeling that Matusz is in the process of getting his confidence and mechanics back. In other words, I thought what Matusz had to say was encouraging. I'm surprised everybody seems to be taking it the other way. Matusz admitting that he wasn't mentally prepared is a good thing...it means he understands the requirements of his profession and will rededicate himself to his craft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We never should have let Kranitz go.

With 20/20 hindsight, I think this is right. Things were going in the right direction at the end of last year with all the pitchers, so it just wasn't the time to make a change. The decision to replace Kranitz and Dunn and bring in Connor and Adair is Buck's alone, and he is accountable for that decision. No, I do not expect or want Andy MacPhail to interfere with a new manager's selection of coaches, nor do I expect the GM to have any role whatsoever when a new coach tells a player to change something. And it is not the place of the AAA pitching coach (who, by the way, never coached Matusz in the minors before this season) to tell the new major league pitching coach that he thinks the changes the coach is making are a mistake. This is on Buck and Connor, entirely.

As to the concern that Matusz has conditioning issues, I find that extremely puzzling. As I posted elsewhere, Matusz spent 13 weeks at API this winter, following a conditioning and diet program. He also coordinated with the strength and conditioning coach. I just don't get it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This interview is extremely depressing. The two potential takeaways are:

1. Matusz is a jerk, a whiner and doesn't prepare well in the offseason or;

2. Buck, Connor, Adair are boneheads in trying to change their best pitcher who has pretty good success thus far in his career to try to prevent base stealing which is not all that relevant anymore.

Either way.. more of the same. bleh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, they asked him to tweak his mechanics out of the stretch, and that ruined his entire repertoire of pitches? He was equally as horrible pitching from the stretch as he was with no runners on base. And he's had six 6 starts with Griffin coaching him in AAA, and the results are still piss poor. I'm thinking its more than Connor trying to get him to throw across his body more with runners on base. But, if I were a 24 year old millionaire who had never had to face any adversity, I'd probably be a d-bag too if I was stinking up the joint.

Things that make you go hmmmmm? :scratchchinhmm:

I've always liked Brian and I think he's being genuine by taking SOME blame. In the end, a tweak here and there should not drop your velocity or cause you to basically lose your command. His velocity has been dropping each of the last two years so this is really more of a trend then a sudden drop in velocity although the drop is much more this year.

I asked Brian on opening day whether he thought he needed to adjust his offseason workouts due to his "slow start" this spring and he didn't think so at the time. Now it appears he might be coming around that his offseason workouts at Athletes performance might not be what he needs to prepare correctly.

Hopefully this lost season will make Brian take a hard look at himself and he'll comeback next year in the best shape of his life and in turn, we'll see a return of his velocity.

If he's healthy, and whether he feels any pain of not, I'm still not totally convinced he is, then next season I expect a return of the Brian Matusz we were counting on. If the same Brian Matusz returns next year it's time to seriously worry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With 20/20 hindsight, I think this is right. Things were going in the right direction at the end of last year with all the pitchers, so it just wasn't the time to make a change. The decision to replace Kranitz and Dunn and bring in Connor and Adair is Buck's alone, and he is accountable for that decision. No, I do not expect or want Andy MacPhail to interfere with a new manager's selection of coaches, nor do I expect the GM to have any role whatsoever when a new coach tells a player to change something. And it is not the place of the AAA pitching coach (who, by the way, never coached Matusz in the minors before this season) to tell the new major league pitching coach that he thinks the changes the coach is making are a mistake. This is on Buck and Connor, entirely.

As to the concern that Matusz has conditioning issues, I find that extremely puzzling. As I posted elsewhere, Matusz spent 13 weeks at API this winter, following a conditioning and diet program. He also coordinated with the strength and conditioning coach. I just don't get it.

Absolutely. Buck has to back Connor/Adair because he brought them in to replace the guys who had basically the same pitching staff pitching great at the end of last year. Since the main reason the Orioles have stunk this year is their terrible pitching, Buck has to be held responsible in the end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely. Buck has to back Connor/Adair because he brought them in to replace the guys who had basically the same pitching staff pitching great at the e4nd of last year. Since the main reason the Orioles have stunk this year is their terrible pitching, Buck has to be held responsible in the end.

100% correct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The guy is a pu***.

"I wasn't "mentally" prepared."

"They changed my mechanics."

"I was out of shape."

WTF! Be a man. All he does is complain. He just gets bombed by the Toledo "freakin" Mud Hens and he's crying in his cheerios about how it's everbody elses fault. But, "I'll just throw them half-way under the bus so I don't look like a total *****." Please! Brian would rather hang out with Chris Tillman in the minors then be a great pitcher in the big leagues. Period.

:agree:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In this case, they are/were. I have no problems saying that.

I'm not so sure that I would believe Matusz's version 100%. Tweaking deliveries, etc. can't be that uncommon and, quite frankly, it doesn't seem like this was a major overhaul by any stretch. The fact that he's been as bad as he's been this year, in my opinion, indicates a much larger problem than a tweaked delivery. Also, I'm a bit concerned that he appears to be so mentally fragile. Adversity happens in baseball and I'm not sold on his response.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing about him going to work out at the athletes performance in the off season means nothing to me. That is really no different than me saying that I am going to join golds gym and work out this summer, I may actually go a few times but may have more fun hanging out at the juice bar with friends checking out the girls working out. I could also see a scenario where you are there with a bunch of friends and it becomes all about tee times and chasing skirts in the evening.

As far as I know about those places it is really about what you put into it, nobody is making you bust your a**.

I don't think anybody looks at Matusz and gets the impression that physically he looks strong. Palmer talks about it all the time and he was someone who always appeared thin but he understood how important leg strength was and ran to stay in shape.

It may not be fair but with Tillman and Matusz being good friends and watching them regress I have to think that priorities may be an issue for those 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Well I sort of disagree here. You said guys have been bad to questionable. I think that’s wrong. I just think a few guys have been awful and that has really hurt us. I would absolutely give Washington more time. Brade and Kane are well liked but doubtful they want to play them much right now. A trade should be considered if things don’t improve.
    • Yeah, I'd rather keep him over Soto.  I mean Soto can't start.  Yes Soto was dominant at times out of the bullpen but he was also gasoline on a fire out of the bullpen.  I would rather pay Suarez $4 or 5 million, knowing he can start or pitch in the bullpen than Soto, knowing he can only start and is liable to melt down when needed most.  
    • It is funny how much Hays (the pre-2024 version anyway) matches the type of player they'll likely look for. I doubt that reunion happens though. 
    • Weird thing about Suarez is that MASN had this being a 2 year deal when they talked about him back in April. ”The Orioles made another smart move with Suárez by signing him to a two-year contract in September. They knew what they’d ask from him and how it could contradict, and they didn’t want to give him any reasons to resist.” https://www.masnsports.com/blog/another-look-at-how-suarez-came-to-the-orioles
    • Dam the mosquito is in my Jelly. Please go away
    • Elias is refusing to spend money that Rubenstein has made available.  Do you have any sources?
    • Outside Hamilton, I can't really think of any areas or invidivuals outside the line that have really stepped up.  Humphrey and Stephens have played okay but it certainly hasn't offset the complete zeroes that Eddie Jackson and Marcus Williams have been.  I don't think you want to pull Hamilton off SS even though he can handle deep zone assignments fine, because he's essentially a linebacker that can cover wide receivers and there's too much value in that in the box.  And I think that Roquan/Simpson look lost in pass coverage because the safeties behind them are playing like butt.  Besides Roquan wasn't ever really a great coverage safety, he was kind of okay at it but he was never like a Lavonte David or Fred Warner there.   I'm starting to wonder if we need to either trade for a FS and/or start giving Ardarius Washington more snaps.  He certainly doesn't look worse than Jackson/Williams at this point in his limited playing time.  In general i think safety is an undervalued position so we're likely to get good value in trade.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...