Jump to content

What Needs To Happen


Brendan25

Recommended Posts

Probably not...of course, they don't have the amount of students that MD has either.

But they have consistently won for the past 25 years or so, thus they have accrued a ton of bandwagon fans over the years as you are well aware. So that should help make up for the smaller student body.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Doesn't help that Maryland charges 40 bucks a ticket for the conference games, minimum, plus another 10 bucks to park, for regular fans. The school really needs to think about slashing ticket prices. Hell they dropped some non-conference games to 15 bucks and the arena had some buzz to it, and fannies in the seats. Do that for other ACC games that aren't going to draw well right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But they have consistently won for the past 25 years or so, thus they have accrued a ton of bandwagon fans over the years as you are well aware. So that should help make up for the smaller student body.

But not everyone is in the state, has the money to go to the games, the time, etc...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But not everyone is in the state, has the money to go to the games, the time, etc...

True. There are many people from out of state who have no good reason to root for them other than being bandwagoners. Good point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doesn't help that Maryland charges 40 bucks a ticket for the conference games, minimum, plus another 10 bucks to park, for regular fans. The school really needs to think about slashing ticket prices. Hell they dropped some non-conference games to 15 bucks and the arena had some buzz to it, and fannies in the seats. Do that for other ACC games that aren't going to draw well right now.

I'd love to go today, but $40-50 plus parking is way too much and HDTV makes it too easy to watch at home. At least with the O's you can go and still get in for under $10 for most games. Isn't baseball great?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doesn't help that Maryland charges 40 bucks a ticket for the conference games, minimum, plus another 10 bucks to park, for regular fans. The school really needs to think about slashing ticket prices. Hell they dropped some non-conference games to 15 bucks and the arena had some buzz to it, and fannies in the seats. Do that for other ACC games that aren't going to draw well right now.

Yeah, good point. They are running a mid-week ACC special for the BC and Miami games that includes 2 tickets, 2 hot dogs and 2 sodas for $44. That's not a bad deal all things considered, my wife and I are thinking of going to at least one of those.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some of the lack of attendance in basketball can be laid on the ACC post expansion. Adding these teams is only good for football. ACC games except the ones against Duke and Carolina aren't as special as they use to be when there was a 9 team league and you played everyone twice. Also the league top to bottom was much more competitive then it has been since expansion. Last year's Wake and this years Boston College are as about as bad of ACC teams that I have ever seen. The Maryland probation teams would go 500 in this league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But not everyone is in the state, has the money to go to the games, the time, etc...

Let's not forget that Cameron holds just over half the capacity of Comcast, and still has a several-thousand-seat student section. It should be much easier to fill, even with 90% of alumni making the drive down I-95 from exit 13A on the NJ Turnpike.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting. When I was at Duke, which is shortly before Coach K arrived, nobody was sleeping in a tent except for the Carolina game, when a minority of people did it. But every game was sold out, and you had to be there about 2 hours before tipoff if you wanted a seat. I wonder if the whole tent-sitting phenomenon has discouraged sane people from going after all these years. I know if I was paying for one of my kids to attend I wouldn't want him/her living in a tent half the year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's not forget that Cameron holds just over half the capacity of Comcast, and still has a several-thousand-seat student section. It should be much easier to fill, even with 90% of alumni making the drive down I-95 from exit 13A on the NJ Turnpike.

And they do fill it...but Duke also has far less people attending vs MD, so its all relative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • 1:2 is good.  Elite is a player like Arraez who is 1+:1.  
    • https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/40027950/ravens-pick-nate-wiggins-nfl-draft-dabo-swinney-text  
    • Was reading Wiggins write up on ESPN. He appears to be more of a home run threat than Koolaid. He had a pick 6 each of the last 2 years.  
    • Starting point has changed.  Given the fact he has approx 1/7th of his season in the books at 1.139, to OPS just .780 for the season, he'd have to drop off to under .730 the rest of the way.  That sort of drop off wouldn't be acceptable to me. I'd like him to OPS .800 the rest of the way for roughly .850 for the season.  The more they use him in a platoon role, the better I think that number might be.
    • Can I ask how you timed it vs the DVR?  Did you use a stopwatch or count click with pause/FF, or something else?
    • I can’t fathom why anyone would want a Tanner Scott return. In 10 innings, he is 0-4 with a 1.78 whip. He was maddening before, and now he’s older. But I wonder if the Red Sox would part with Justin Slaten? He’s been pretty outstanding. Yeah, only 8 innings, but we hired Yohan Ramirez, and he’s been a catastrophe in 10. Yes, I know he’s a rule 5, and the Bosox are in the East. And their pitching is pretty thin, too. But they know they aren’t going anywhere in this division, and they might think getting a good return for a Free Rule 5 guy might be worthwhile.
    • This draft unfolded weirdly.  First with the *nix guys getting taken early and then how no defensive players got taken all draft, and then a bunch of teams reaching for OTs.  I'm pretty happy with how the draft unfolded because I think we got a player that I expected to be gone by the teens or early 20s.  I don't know what we're doing with our OL but hopefully we can maybe trade up from 62 to pick someone up.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...