Jump to content

Mazzone: Then I went to Baltimore....


Fan4Life

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply
While I'm sure his comments have merit I'd wager that a lot of this is sour grapes over Perlozzo's (rightful) ouster.

Maybe, but Mazzone was a pretty distinguished pitching coach and voiced plenty of concerns about the Orioles developmental process.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was down in corporate box seats about ten rows back behind home plate one night late in Sam's reign. He had a large contingent in the seats nearby was constantly distracted by them and in the midst of a horrible run with horrible play. He seemed to be holding court and having the time of his life. I was glad to have someone who took the losses as if they meant something. Trembley helped change the culture of the Orioles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So what? Is he supposed to turn off his human trait?

The O's get criticized because they deserve it. Truth be told, we have to hope Buck and DD are strong enough to fix things because the people before them certainly weren't, and the stench of this ownership still floats down the organization every single day. If people don't think that's a fact, you live in a dream world. It's the omnipresent higher bar the O's always have to jump if they want to succeed, and that didn't go away just because we're finally having a good year.

I was merely pointing out that Mazzone does still criticize the current Orioles-not only the Orioles of the past. When I listen to him-it seems that his judgement has been permanently scarred. I believe that he will still criticize the Orioles even if they win a World Series, but I could be wrong about this. Hopefully we all get to find out!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Truth hurts. I wish it had been said many years ago. Maybe it wouldn't have taken so long for things to (hopefully) change.

It was said years ago. Mazzone goes off on these rants about the O's fairly often.

Someone should have told him the Umps were not going to call pitches 3 inches off the plate strikes against the Sox and Yanks.

He just needs to get on with his life already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hear what you are saying-but I do have to say that Mazone does still criticize the current Orioles on the local sportstalk radio station in Atlanta. I do not think that he believes that anything has truly changed.

I think Angelos and the organization in general deserves all the criticism they get. I do not believe that Angelos, his sons, and his cronies have fundamentally changed. I think they respect and like Buck and I think Buck is clearly in charge of the clubhouse and the field. But it will be interesting to see if they let DD make big changes in the offseason. Surely DD would like to sign some high end players, but who knows if he will be allowed to sign significant free agents or make significant trades. So far DD has done a good job and certainly has made many moves, but they have all been small. The team still has glaring wholes that need to be fixed. Until the Angelos regime allows a GM to fully shape a roster, then I will continue to believe that they haven't really changed and I won't be surprised when they screw things up in the future. There's way too much data/history to cut them slack anytime soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was said years ago. Mazzone goes off on these rants about the O's fairly often.

Someone should have told him the Umps were not going to call pitches 3 inches off the plate strikes against the Sox and Yanks.

He just needs to get on with his life already.

His current job is to talk about baseball through his experiences. He worked for arguably the best organization and the worst organization in baseball and what a contrast that provided. We should tell Jim Palmer to get on with his life already the next time he talks about his days as an Oriole. Geez. Mazzone never did anything to hurt the Orioles. I don't understand why you guys are so hostile to him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Angelos and the organization in general deserves all the criticism they get. I do not believe that Angelos, his sons, and his cronies have fundamentally changed. I think they respect and like Buck and I think Buck is clearly in charge of the clubhouse and the field. But it will be interesting to see if they let DD make big changes in the offseason. Surely DD would like to sign some high end players, but who knows if he will be allowed to sign significant free agents or make significant trades. So far DD has done a good job and certainly has made many moves, but they have all been small. The team still has glaring wholes that need to be fixed. Until the Angelos regime allows a GM to fully shape a roster, then I will continue to believe that they haven't really changed and I won't be surprised when they screw things up in the future. There's way too much data/history to cut them slack anytime soon.

Well said!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest rochester
Leo is a current radio talk show host in Atlanta. Mike and Mike brought him on to talk about Steven Strausburg's innings limit but asked him about the situation in Boston first.

Here's a transcription of the beginning part of that conversation:

------

"It all starts at the top, it's called the chain of command. And with the chain of command I got to expirence both ends of it. When I was with the Atlanta Braves there was a chain of command that was in place, that was never broken. It was never broken by the players. It started with ownership, with Ted Turner, then it started with the general manager, with John Schuerholz, then Manager Bobby Cox, then the coaching staff and the players. So you had a chain of command that was never broken.

Then I go to Baltimore and find out why they're losing. The chain of command was always broken... where players got to voice their displeasure to the front office which took away the power of the manager and nobody really knew who was running what. Basically what it was, was a bunch of players finding excuses for losing. So this is what's going on."

*Golic chimes in with some babble and a question ending with "doesn't the onus fall on the players to just get the job done?"*

"Absolutely they do. We had situations in Atlanta where if you didn't act a certain way or play a certain way you were gone... or you were told 'this is the way it's going to be'. Then when I went to another organization, it was, 'oh why are we doing this?' and questioning everything, and 'how come we're doing this and how come we're doing that?'

So they bring in Bobby Valentine to change the atmosphere there. And I know Bobby, I've known him a long time, and he's very... he's different, ok *laughing*. But you know what, he's one of the brightest individuals I've ever been around, one of the smartest guys I've ever been around. And I think he knows exactly what he's doing. And I think back on it, I remember what Pedroia said that one time, he said "We don't do things this way around here." Oh we don't, huh?! Well you're not winning, you're not doing this and you're not doing that... I think it goes back to what's going on in the clubhouse and I do put it on the players, and I do think there are certain ways to handle it and certain approaches to take. You have to be in the clubhouse to really experience it... but... it all starts at the top."

*Greeny then turns the discussion to Strausburg.*

He is right... but this is why I am enjoying the (hoped for) transformation. DD/Buck are not afraid to option, DFA, send to BP, etc. anyone that does not perform. IIRC Sam was one in a long line of (IMO) too much leverage to "veteranocity."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't have a problem with Mazzone expressing his opinion of what was wrong with the organization in 2006 and 2007. Sam Perlozzo was fired just as Andy MacPhail was hired, and Mazzone was let go at the end of that season. So, Mazzone knows very little about how things were run under MacPhail, much less how they are being run under Duquette. I have little doubt that Perlozzo didn't have the respect and authority that Showalter has.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hear what you are saying-but I do have to say that Mazone does still criticize the current Orioles on the local sportstalk radio station in Atlanta. I do not think that he believes that anything has truly changed.

Didn't we take 2 out 3 from them? :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't have a problem with Mazzone expressing his opinion of what was wrong with the organization in 2006 and 2007. Sam Perlozzo was fired just as Andy MacPhail was hired, and Mazzone was let go at the end of that season. So, Mazzone knows very little about how things were run under MacPhail, much less how they are being run under Duquette. I have little doubt that Perlozzo didn't have the respect and authority that Showalter has.

Did you hear him this morning? Just curious. I don't think anyone faults him for his opinion, but hearing how it was expressed this morning was quite strange.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I must be in the minority.  I pay no attention to what uniforms and caps are worn on a given day.  You could ask me five minutes after the game what caps the team wore, and I wouldn’t be able to tell you. But I could tell you what happened in the game in vivid detail.  
    • I don’t see any kind of “logjam”. That would imply some sort of challenge with having too much talent in one place/spot. What we have is a hodgepodge of mediocre to below average pitchers who are very interchangeable in terms of their talents (or lack there of). Of the pitchers that you mentioned, probably Bradish (who we don’t know about right now coming off the elbow injury) and maybe Suarez (very small sample size) are any good.  The rest …. They can be swapped out for one another and I don’t think any real difference is made. I hope Means can be the John Means of 2021. But the reality is that was a long time ago at this point. I don’t think that it is very probably that he will make it through the season and pitch effectively into October and be healthy the whole time. That’s probably pie in the sky/wishful thinking at this point.
    • This question was kind os answered today on BaltimoreBaseball.com.  I seem to recall that the choice was scheduled, Friday was black jersey and O's cap (before the city connect) and Saturday was the orange jersey.  Wondering when they changed to starting pitcher's choice.   https://www.baltimorebaseball.com/2024/04/26/midday-mailbag-orioles-wear-black-jerseys-often/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=midday-mailbag-orioles-wear-black-jerseys-often&utm_source=BaltimoreBaseball.com+List&utm_campaign=06dfb0fd98-RSS_MAILCHIMP&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_cddc084dff-06dfb0fd98-47594557&mc_cid=06dfb0fd98&mc_eid=f169a521ef
    • Most quality major league starter's hold their velocity throughout their starts. They may cruise for a bit, but have it when they want it. Typically command goes long before velocity.
    • Do we not want to throw a left hander and take advantage of the spacious left field?
    • Thank goodness a minor league system is not judged on wins and losses, because they are putting many Ws up of late. Delmarva is pretty much an embarrassment right now from the hitting side. The first real wave of international position prospects have been left wanting after the first month or so of the season. The Shorebirds are scoring a league low 2.29 runs per game and slashing a league worse .182/.259/.263/.523. The Tides pitching outside of Povich and McDermott to a lesser extent has been pretty bad minus a few decent relieves in Vespi, Krook and Charles.  Elias/Sig's thought on being able to identify pitching talent through pitch shapes and spin rates through the draft after the 10th round has been a pretty big failure. Armbruster was the flag ship pitcher and he's been a flop this year so far, though I had already seen major red flags from him last year. Not surprisingly these guys struggle at the high levels and why they were available that late. Glad to see Elias made a change in his draft philosophy last year and went after some younger, higher ceiling guys like Forret vs 21-year old juniors in those later rounds.   
    • Akin currently has a FIP of 1.11. He’s struck out 15 and walked 3 in 10 innings without yielding a homer.  I consider that well.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...