Jump to content

O's will probably make a trade at the meetings


Going Underground

Recommended Posts

Butler's career high in HR before last year was 21. He's had two seasons where he's been a 3 WAR player. I think people are getting a little carried away.

He's only 26. Started his major league carrer at 20 or 21. 3 out of the last 4 years he's hit .300 and had over .850 OPS. He will easily be a better hitter than Reynolds for about the same price per year. The trend is extremely positive and every indication suggests he can be a 30 hr 100 rbi in the future. Not every year, but neither was Eddie Murray. Nothing wrong with getting excited about this guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 246
  • Created
  • Last Reply
If I were DD, I'd be on the phone with KC trying to work a deal for one of Hosmer/Butler. I'd prefer Butler because of the potential of him being a 3/4 hitter in our lineup and the production he has given throughout his career.

Butler has raked in Camden Yards ever since he step foot in the league and seems to have finally turned his double power into hitting homeruns, evident by his 30+ homerun season this year. This move would also allow the O's to use there surplus of young arms to acquire a MOO bat the team has been seeking since Raffy in the late 90's.

I think a package of Tillman, Hoes/Avery, and a bullpen arm like Strop could entice KC into making a deal.

Although it's not my 100% dream scenario, I wouldn't be too disappointed with this lineup (Assuming what it would be based on your scenario, no reynolds):

1- McLouth (LF)

2- Markakis (RF)

3- Jones (CF)

4- Butler (DH)

5- Davis (1B)

6- Wieters ©

7- Hardy (SS)

8- Machado (3B)

9- Casilla? (2B)

Might even make sense to go:

3- Butler

4- Davis

5- Jones

6- Wieters

7- Hardy

for R/L/R/L purposes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Makes no sense. Duquette has consistently said that he didn't expect to be a big player in the free agent market. If there is frustration, it should be over the fact that other teams seem to think the cavalry are frauds and not worthy of significant trade interest. Unfortunately, that's about all we have to trade outside of the top 3 prospects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DKnobler ‏@DKnobler

Orioles seem a little frustrated. Want to add, but appears they don't have money to play big on FA market.

You must sit and monitor Twitter for a living. Getting pissed off about a one line message that is one mans opinion, with little to no context available is pretty silly. How do you have the time to instantly post every tweet the minute it arises? I'm jealous, I wish I had that kind of time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You must sit and monitor Twitter for a living. Getting pissed off about a one line message that is one mans opinion, with little to no context available is pretty silly. How do you have the time to instantly post every tweet the minute it arises? I'm jealous, I wish I had that kind of time.

Jealous, but also thankful that we have someone to post the opinions of randoms every ten minutes and turn them into random crusades.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hahaha.

I'm just saying, Hamilton is, and was, never likely in the picture. Greinke? Likely not either, but who knows? So, after those two, what big time FAs should the Orioles be throwing stupid money/years on? I personally don't see much appeal out there. But that's just me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm just saying, Hamilton is, and was, never likely in the picture. Greinke? Likely not either, but who knows? So, after those two, what big time FAs should the Orioles be throwing stupid money/years on? I personally don't see much appeal out there. But that's just me.

Agree with this. People complain endlessly about us being stingy but what free agents would you want to get? Hamilton's a bad investment for whoever gets him. So is Geinke. The fact is free agency is not an efficient way to add talent to the team. Interestingly, there is actually no correlation between payroll and wins in the MLB. And yet we've got hoards of O's fans seeing red because DD won't throw $40 million at Mike Napoli or Adam Laroche. Free agency if for front offices who lack the resources to pull off deft trades, plain and simple. Moreover, our payroll is actually set to increase by close to 20%, which is quite the jump by any standard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You must sit and monitor Twitter for a living. Getting pissed off about a one line message that is one mans opinion, with little to no context available is pretty silly. How do you have the time to instantly post every tweet the minute it arises? I'm jealous, I wish I had that kind of time.

Technology is your friend

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Technology is your friend

I don't follow twitter, but my phone notifies me of every facebook and email. I would imagine that you could set that up for twitter as well. I enjoy hearing the twitter remarks since I dont follow and just look at here and rotoworld.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Angelos did fight the relocation.  He voted against, lobbied against it, withheld permission to adjust TV territories, and threatened to sue if not fairly compensated.  As long as the team was compensated for the loss of broadcast exclusivity, I don’t think he had any other case. From all reports, he drove a hard bargain and it took like 9 months to negotiate a compensation and settlement agreement. There was a wide discrepancy among various parties about what constituted just compensation with Angelos taking more pessimistic views of the impact of the Nats franchise and less optimistic view on MASN. Also, MASN was in perpetuity not temporary.  In hindsight, MASN probably didn’t provide the revenue protection intended because of how the dispute played out and how the RSN market collapsed, but that’s in hindsight. Overall, Angelos “won” the MASN dispute (at least the RSDC process) more than he lost it - the Nationals advocated for rights fees intentionally designed to bankrupt MASN but the RSDC didn’t use their comps. Overall, I think it’s fair to say that relocating a team to DC has hurt the Baltimore club’s market size and ability to fund a top-10 payroll.   HOWEVER, had the Nats not come to DC, the specter of an Orioles relocation to DC would have been hanging over our heads especially as Peter’s health declined, the stadium aged, and the lease approached. Peter would never have moved, but are we sure JA would turn down a higher offer of say $2.3BN offer from Ted Leonsis or someone with the intent to move the club to DC? I think as an Orioles fan it’s probably best to have another team in DC than have to worry about the Orioles ever relocating there.
    • Everything revolves around the health of the player. I think Gunnar has more. I think the collision with Mateo set Gunnar back and affected him in ways we will never know. I'm no mind specialist but Gunnar is young plays all out, and that had to bother him. I've watched that collision a number of times. No fault - just two players going all out and one is finished for the year. It just so happened that Gunnar got the yips and his batting went south soon thereafter. Maybe a coincidence but I think we will see a rejuvenated Gunnar next year and all stops are off. 
    • I’m not so sure the bolded part is true. I think a lot of that last bit can have to do with small skills: situational hitting/running, above average play in close games, generally things that can be boiled down to “luck.” I didn’t see this years team as having a major talent discrepancy from the 2023 version.
    • As great as Gunnar is can’t assume he matches last year. That said I like the odds of the team as a whole matching what we did. 
    • The real improvement of this team will come from within.    The 3-5 players they bring in from outside the org will supplement the roster…maybe put it over the top but the real improvement will come from those already in the org.
    • Yeah. -Would love to keep Burnes but I seriously doubt it. -I have a lot of faith in Adley.  - Holliday has huge ceiling even if he isn’t ready to be elite.  - doesn’t always work this way but the better your closer is tends to help rest of pen 
    • Nice OP. Thanks for the effort. Like the chart. Surprised it hasn't received much response. You sum up a lot of what I hope for as well. I'd add: I think a full - healty year of Westy will be even more valuable. I think Gunnar has even more in the tank. I want - hope that Holliday can develop into the lead off hitter and OBP table setter we need. And, I so want Cowser to cut down on strike outs and continue to develop as a professional hitter. I think he has the potential to cover for the loss of Santander while Big K develops on the right side. A lot to hope for but I believe these youngsters have a lot of potential yet to tap. And oh yes - I want Mayo to make Roy and all of us proud! Thanks again for the effort! I look at pitching as if we have a base. I agree with your points 1 and 2.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...