Jump to content

O's get Bud Norris


Greg

Recommended Posts

Might as well trade 'em all then.

Except Hader isn't a highly rated prospect. Bundy is. Gausman is. Hader is a relative non-prospect at this point despite his success at the lowest levels of the minor leagues. So yeah, trade all the Hader's you want as far as I'm concerned. The success rate on Hader-type prospects is probably quite low, so if he can fetch you someone who can hopefully provide ~5+ WAR at arbitration prices for the next two season, then yeah.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 356
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I'm having a difficult time trying to get excited for a guy with below average life time numbers.

34-46, that's a .425 winning percentage with a 4.33 ERA.

He's...

5-28 in 39 games when the Astros score 2 runs or less

16-14 in 54 games when the Astros score 3-5 runs

13-4 in 25 games when the Astros score 6+ runs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, we may have traded Strop, Arrieta, Delmonico, Hader, Hoes + Comp Pick for half a season of Feldman, half a season of KRod and 2 and a half seasons of Norris. But these moves make us better AND we didn't have to trade ERod, Gausman, Bundy, Hunter, Schoop, Britton, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Horrible. We've now traded 2 maybe 3 top ten prospects for 2 very mediocre starting pitchers one of whom will be gone in 2 months and the other isn't cheap. Hate this move.

So you prefer Hammel? That's who we keep going without Norris. So I like the

deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like this trade more thank I liked the K-Rod trade, but I'm not thrilled either.

Duquette's putting pressure on himself to be able to continuously churn out B level prospects like Delmonico and Hader. It's not like he's working with high draft picks like we used to have either.

Delmonico, Hader, Hoes, Arrieta, Strop, and the pick for Bud Norris, K-Rod, and Feldman.

That is a great job dealing. We got two guys to put into the rotaion and a late inning reliever for a guy that is a decent hitter but has trouble staying healthy and no posisition, a single A pitcher that does have some upside but a long way from helping if he ever does. An outfielder that does not hit for much power and currently has no place on this team now or in the future, a starter that was given chance after chance and did nothing, a guy that many wanted to release most of the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two most popular people in sports:

1. Back-up QB on a losing team.

2. Any prospect in the O's organization traded for a player that has proven he can do it at the major league level.

The problem is that Bud Norris hasn't proven he can "do it" at the ML level. In fact, if you look at his minor league stats, he didn't prove he could do it there either. The more I find out about Norris, the more I think this isn't a trade that will help us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm having a difficult time trying to get excited for a guy with below average life time numbers.

34-46, that's a .425 winning percentage with a 4.33 ERA.

U realize W/L really do not mean anything when discussing how good a pitcher is?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apparently Norris has some issues against lefties:

Norris throws a fastball or a slider more than 90% of the time against right-handers. Those are his two best pitches. The problem is, of course, that the slider has a platoon split and isn?t very useful against lefties. That?s why Norris? FIP is a full run higher against lefties over his career. His walk rate doubles because he?s trying to put that slider in very specific places, and his home run rate is 20% worse against lefties because when he misses those spots, the ball gets punished.
He does have a changeup, and he throws it to lefties. Last year, he threw it around 10% of the time to lefties, and this year, it?s more like 18%. He knows about the slider, and platoon splits, so he?s giving it a go. Too bad, because now his strikeout rate against lefties has tanked (20.1% career, 12.5% this year), and he?s giving up even more home runs to lefties. The changeup gets about half of the whiffs of a league average changeup.
By our park factors, Norris is leaving a park that augments homers by lefties by 2% and going to one that augments the same by 24%. That?s a little scary.

http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/orioles-acquire-bud-norris-and-his-platoon-problems/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well remember, prospects are nothing more than commodities. At the end of the day it's about winning major league baseball games and if the Orioles can move some to get major league players that help this and the next it's a good thing. they haven't moved one of the A prospects yet and as long as that doesn't occur I'm fine with these moves. It's take quality to get quality. At least we have some guys other organizations value and that's a good sign.

This is the same way he went about it when he was with the Red Sox. Started trading off some assets he inherited to get key big league pieces. In the process got one of the greatest SP's of all-time with P. Martinez. He gave up a top 5 prospect in Carl Pavano in that deal too. Before there is any panic amongst the O's fans. Remember the guy has a track record of acquiring talent. What he stunk with was communication in Beantown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • Does anybody know that he is an ex Yankee?
    • I put this ridiculousness in the game recap, but I think it belongs here as well.  Using AI you can really make some crazy stuff. 😂 https://suno.com/song/8f21dd9e-af4e-4284-9f23-c566260ca6ce
    • A buddy of mine made this with his AI. I figured I’d just put this here. 😂   https://suno.com/song/8f21dd9e-af4e-4284-9f23-c566260ca6ce
    • I was listening to MLB Prospects podcast last week. They talked about Gillen, and mentioned a lot about how he may be the best high school hitter. However, it’s a tough call where he’ll go because of a weak arm. They said the arm was injured, a right labrum, and his arm strength is not back after two years. So, probably wasn’t going to be a SS anyway when said and done due to size, maybe a 2B/LF or CF profile due to the weak arm and 60 speed. He was projected to maybe become the top high school player in the draft as a sophomore, but injured the shoulder and had some other injuries that have held him back. It is going to be interesting to see where Elias goes with picks 22 and 32. I would like to see Gillen there, but I think he’ll be gone. Kellon Lindsey is interesting, and maybe Billy Amick, along with one of the previous college hitters you mentioned will sneak through. Lindsey is rising fast.
    • A good friend of mine coaches college baseball.  He’s studied and dedicated his career to understanding how humans move. Not all humans move the same way.  An incredible talent could potentially be taught to move against his body’s preference and fail.  New wave progressive coaches understand how various body types work and the nuance to teach/coach them effectively.  
    • I'm still trying to figure out how this guy is out of the majors for 7 years and somehow manages to pick up 2 MPH on his fastball, at the age of 34.  But hey, I'm not complaining.   Statcast loves him so far this year.  Statcast thought he was a little unlucky in his last stint in the majors, and unsurprisingly they think he's getting a little lucky now, but even accounting for his good luck he's still in great pitcher territory.
    • 2 "gutsy" starts in a row.  That's exactly what you want out of veterans to demonstrate to the young guys.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...