Jump to content

TSN's Deveney's Take on Roberts-Cubs


dgroomes

Recommended Posts

Pie and Cedeno for Greene, but you won't include Pie in a deal for Roberts? You are losing me there, Dave.

The Cubs can't afford both Fuld and Theriot in the everyday lineup. It's one or the other. Obviously Greene would send Theriot to the bench. Roberts would not.

If the Cubs get Roberts and Greene, then I don't give a hoot who winds up with Pie.

However if they get just Roberts, then Pie has to stay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 153
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Greene actually had below average D in 2007.

http://www.baseballmusings.com/cgi-bin/DisplayCharts.py?PlayerID=1826&fpos=6&year=2007

He was was pretty good in 2006 prior to getting hurt though.

http://www.baseballmusings.com/cgi-bin/DisplayCharts.py?PlayerID=1826&fpos=6&year=2006

And for comparisons sake, KG had an OPS+ of 100 in 2007 (97 in 2006) and JP also had 100 in 2007 (83 in 2006).

Miggy had an 109 OPS+ in 2007 and 126 in 2006. Tulowitzki had a 108 in 2007.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.sportingnews.com/yourturn/viewtopic.php?t=348723

Can we get Deveney to join the Cubs front office? :)

Maybe we can flip one of our current OF's for a MLB ready SS or 2B prospect... wont happen... but its nice to know that there's one columnist out there that thinks a Roberts/ Pie deal should happen.

Sorry if this has already been stated.. but this makes perfect sense. This is a deal that the Orioles would be foolish to turn down- as it not only gives us a sick outfield... but it would replace the biggest things we'd be giving up in Roberts- his leadoff bat and speed on the bases. So while it'd leave the hole at 2nd (but w/ a possible trade chip in Scott)- it wouldn't leave as much of a hole in the lineup.

Keep holding out Macphail. It's Pie or nothing! :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Cubs can't afford both Fuld and Theriot in the everyday lineup. It's one or the other. Obviously Greene would send Theriot to the bench. Roberts would not.

If the Cubs get Roberts and Greene, then I don't give a hoot who winds up with Pie.

However if they get just Roberts, then Pie has to stay.

If that is the case Dave, wouldn't the Cubs be better served to offer a Pie-led package for Roberts and your "usual suspects" for Greene? A Murton-led package is very likely to get you Greene. Roberts is the bigger prize. Greene is certain to leave San Diego after 2009 and would also be a lesser chance of resigning with the Cubs than Roberts would. Why offer your big chip for Greene? I'm not with you there at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Peralta is younger and cheaper. Btw, not sure how i am overrating him...I expect around a 800 OPS and average defense.

And the Cubs seem to value BRob more than Greene, so if that is the case, why not argue they should give up Pie for BRob?

Are you arguing what YOU want or what the CUBS want?

That's what I'm hearing now that I'm catching up on this thread. Anyone who vehemently argues that Roberts is NOT worth Pie- on a team that wants/needs to WIN NOW- isn't thinking clearly. Roberts is a proven all-star 2nd baseman- who will help any lineup. Pie has proven NOTHING at the major league level.

Nothing you can say will guarantee that Pie comes in to his own this year, and for a team that is built to win right now- that's quite a gamble with a top tier 2nd baseman staring you in the face.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If that is the case Dave, wouldn't the Cubs be better served to offer a Pie-led package for Roberts and your "usual suspects" for Greene? A Murton-led package is very likely to get you Greene. Roberts is the bigger prize. Greene is certain to leave San Diego after 2009 and would also be a lesser chance of resigning with the Cubs than Roberts would. Why offer your big chip for Greene? I'm not with you there at all.

Follow along.

If Pie is traded, Fuld will have to play CF.

If Fuld is playing CF, I need Theriot out of the lineup. Don't want both in there.

If Theriot is out of the lineup, I need an upgrade at SS.

Greene is an upgrade at SS. Therefore, Pie can be traded for Greene.

Roberts is not an upgrade at SS. Therefore, Pie cannot be traded for Roberts.

Any sort of three-way deal that puts both Greene and Roberts in CHI, and Pie in BAL, is fine by me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's what I'm hearing now that I'm catching up on this thread. Anyone who vehemently argues that Roberts is NOT worth Pie- on a team that wants/needs to WIN NOW- isn't thinking clearly. Roberts is a proven all-star 2nd baseman- who will help any lineup. Pie has proven NOTHING at the major league level.

Nothing you can say will guarantee that Pie comes in to his own this year, and for a team that is built to win right now- that's quite a gamble with a top tier 2nd baseman staring you in the face.

I'm thinking very clearly.

Roberts is not enough of an upgrade at 2B to warrant opening a gaping hole in CF.

You can't look at Pie vs. Roberts in a vaccuum the way you have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Follow along.

If Pie is traded, Fuld will have to play CF.

If Fuld is playing CF, I need Theriot out of the lineup. Don't want both in there.

If Theriot is out of the lineup, I need an upgrade at SS.

Greene is an upgrade at SS. Therefore, Pie can be traded for Greene.

Roberts is not an upgrade at SS. Therefore, Pie cannot be traded for Roberts.

Any sort of three-way deal that puts both Greene and Roberts in CHI, and Pie in BAL, is fine by me.

How about send Theriot our way so we have him for SS or 2B.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm thinking very clearly.

Roberts is not enough of an upgrade at 2B to warrant opening a gaping hole in CF.

You can't look at Pie vs. Roberts in a vaccuum the way you have.

With all due respect, I'm not sure it is us that is looking at it in a vacuum. Hendry has already stated that he has lined up two deals. Maybe this is exactly what he has lined up. Or perhaps it is the Pie-led deal for Roberts and a deal to Texas for Byrd. I don't know, but, in any case, I doubt if he is thinking one-dimensionally about this. I know McPhail isn't. I'm just saying that a package of your "usual suspects" without Pie is less likely to land you Roberts than Greene.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FWIW here's a run down of Peralta's defense from MLTR.

The average AL shortstop is hitting .283/.339/.416 this season, very similar to Peralta's output this year. So he'll be at least tolerable with the stick and can probably surpass that. How about defense?

Peralta's range doesn't seem to impress the fine gentlemen of The Fielding Bible. He's below average on plays to his left, and even worse going to his right. On the other hand, they describe his arm as "accurate" and note that he was the best in baseball at turning double plays in 2005.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They trade Murton for Byrd who would llikely hit better than Pie the next 2 years.

The only problem being Texas has already said 'no thanks' to Murton for Byrd straight up. The Rangers have asked for a "Gallagher-type" pitcher in addition to Murton. I don't see the Cubs making that move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pie and Cedeno for Greene, but you won't include Pie in a deal for Roberts? You are losing me there, Dave.

Pretty simple.

Greene is probably a five to six win upgrade over Theriot. Roberts is a two or three win upgrade over DeRosa.

If we were going to trade Pie, I'd rather we do it in the trade that helps us most.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With all due respect, I'm not sure it is us that is looking at it in a vacuum. Hendry has already stated that he has lined up two deals. Maybe this is exactly what he has lined up. Or perhaps it is the Pie-led deal for Roberts and a deal to Texas for Byrd. I don't know, but, in any case, I doubt if he is thinking one-dimensionally about this. I know McPhail isn't. I'm just saying that a package of your "usual suspects" without Pie is less likely to land you Roberts than Greene.

I'm not sure how you can make this statement, considering a package without Pie is very likely going to land Roberts, while there's nothing to suggest that Greene is even available.

Regardless, I've said several times now that if both Roberts and a significant SS upgrade come over, then I don't really give a rip who winds up with Pie.

It's Roberts for Pie *without* an upgrade at SS that I'm opposed to. And the O's don't have a SS upgrade to offer. It's really that simple.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • As long you’ve been a fan of the O’s, as impressive as Mayo’s offensive stats are, you have to know that those Minor League numbers do not carry a direct one-to-one correlation to the Bigs. Despite the gaudy numbers, there is no guarantee that he wouldn’t struggle initially with the O’s (like so many other recent prospects have). Is there any downside in allowing him to continue to work on his defense at AAA? Since that appears to be the area of his game that is not “big league ready”?
    • So am I reading those suggestions correctly? They think Mountcastle is either worth a Tier One Division One starter... or a Tier 2 Division 2 starter? I vote for the first 😉
    • So... innocently misreading a post is ban-worthy?
    • Posted this in another thread but a reminder of how Holliday views his leg kick:   https://blogs.fangraphs.com/jackson-holliday-talks-hitting/   Now maybe he’s wrong about the leg kick as he faces tougher pitching but I don’t see him dropping it anytime soon. I also don’t recall anyone being worried about it before.
    • He's definitely hit a wall. I think he needs another year.
    • Well he isn't exactly tearing it up since he got sent down.  I think he is something like 6 for 31 since?  Which makes him 8 for 70  (roughly) since his call up. Which is batting around .115 or so for the past month. He has obviously hit a level of talent that he is not handling all that well.  Considering his age, unless he really starts tearing it up?  I would be inclined to leave him down in AAA all year until the late season call ups.   
    • Roy, man I love you as a sportscaster personality and more importantly as just a genuinely nice person.   I do. But this is why I said last week in the thread you made about how the O's would get blown out by the Yankees that you are saying things lately that don't seem to be making much sense and many other posters would be banned by now for the same things. And don't get me wrong.  I don't want you banned and I hope you keep posting for a long long time.  You are a true O's, albeit very emotional..FAN. But Roy, read the OP.  He clearly said those trade ideas were from a Red's message board. 2 times I believe. Cmonnnnnnnn man!   BTW as far as the actual trade ideas?  Laughable.  Not even being a homer.  But just laughable.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...