Jump to content

Official Winter Meetings Thread


weams

Recommended Posts

There were also indications the Pirates discussed a potential trade with the Orioles on Tuesday for lefty Brian Matusz in which outfielder Travis Snider would be shipped to Baltimore. Matusz has two years of club control remaining.

http://www.timesonline.com/sports/pirates/huntington-doesn-t-expect-major-moves-for-pirates-rest-of/article_7526f0f6-7fe4-11e4-b81c-9f6abaece980.html

Would very much like this move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>So if the Orioles got Travis Snider for Matusz, they'd essentially be getting a 26 year old version of Nick Markakis, for 1/10th the price</p>— Dave Tucker (@TestudoDave) <a href="

">December 10, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would happily make that move.

So would I be is he even a starter?

Love how he "blasted" 13 home runs:)...

http://m.bleacherreport.com/articles/2289925-why-the-pittsburgh-pirates-should-consider-trading-outfielder-travis-snider?utm_campaign=tsiphone&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=twitter.com?is_shared=true

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<iframe height="212" title="Embedded Tweet" class="twitter-tweet twitter-tweet-rendered" id="twitter-widget-0" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" style="border-width: 1px; border-style: solid; border-color: rgb(238, 238, 238) rgb(221, 221, 221) rgb(187, 187, 187); margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px; border-radius: 5px; width: 500px; display: block; visibility: visible; position: static; min-width: 220px; max-width: 99%; box-shadow: 0px 1px 3px rgba(0,0,0,0.15);" allowtransparency="true" allowfullscreen=""></iframe>

<script src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8" async=""></script>

Except for the price part that seems to be hopelessly optimistic. Snider has been in the league for parts of six seasons, 500+ games, and 1700 plate appearances, and his entire career is only slightly more valuable than Markakis' 2014.

<iframe id="rufous-sandbox" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" style="display: none;" allowtransparency="true"></iframe>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>So if the Orioles got Travis Snider for Matusz, they'd essentially be getting a 26 year old version of Nick Markakis, for 1/10th the price</p>— Dave Tucker (@TestudoDave) <a href="
">December 10, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

I don't know if I'd go that far. Snider's 2014 was comparable to Nick's 2014. It was also Snider's best season in the Majors by a significant margin. Maybe at 26, Snider is finally coming into his own. It's not unreasonable to think that. It just is no sure thing. Nick is also better defensively. Snider is an upgrade over Nick because of the lower salary, age, and upside but I think its far from guaranteed that he will perform as well as Nick will in 2015 and 2016.

Having said that, if the Pirates agree to that deal I'd do it in a second.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the Pirates do this I bet they turn Matusz back into a starter. I don't see them trading for him, paying him the salary he'll get this year, and just having him as a middle to late type of reliever, or lefty specialist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It kind of worked well. They got a couple of playoff births, then they ended up with the oldest and highest paid team in baseball and very quickly collapsed into a 14-year abyss. If you're not very careful with the resource mix between developing talent/finding cheap talent, and free agency it's easy to slip over the cliff like the 1998 Orioles and the 2014 Phillies. Only a small handful of big teams can rely on free agency instead of carefully treading around its edges and dipping in only with great trepidation.

A lot of the failure of the Orioles can be linked to a very poor farm system from 1979-present.

Nearly all of our homegrown pitching prospects failed to reach expectations and the quality position players have been few and far between .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I'm afraid I will have to see it to believe it. I have been disappointed way too many times to count.
    • To build off your point, Elias quotes suggest that the intent is for payroll to be higher in 2025 than 2024.  The only way I see that happening is to sign premium SP (or re-sign Burnes).  Simple shortcut math 2025 Eflin offsets 2024 Burnes salary, leaving $25M to fill for 2024 Santander+Kimbrel.  Arb raises and full year Seranthony + Soto may wash to neutral-ish with no Hayes, Means (or at most $5M more in 2025).  Net/net that leaves $20-$25M to stay flat.  So IMO if payroll is to rise year-on-year, it has to be from adding premium pitching (given Santander as QO and leave as FA).
    • IMO Goldschmidt and Alonso are not equivalents as players at this point. Goldschmidt is much closer to done and I would stay far away from him. We need at least one good/impactful veteran hitter. Not somebody who used to be good. 
    • They will probably go after Sugano the 35 year old at the end of his career as he is cheaper and no posting fee.  
    • David Ortiz also commanded the strike zone.  He didn't swing at a lot of junk.  He got his pitch or the pitcher made a mistake, he hit it.  Pitchers will let you get yourself out all day if you swing at pitches repeatedly out of the zone.  We need to do a better job of this.  
    • Elias has said that he and his staff are (or will be) making an exhaustive inquiry to identify the sources of this team's underperformance -- which I take to mean not just the playoff defeats, but also the underperformance during the second half of the sentence. Sounds good.  But at the same time, before that investigation has gotten underway, Elias has announced that Hyde will be back next year. I believe many of the criticisms of Hyde's in-game decisions, lack of fire, failure to take action in response to boneheaded baserunning, etc., etc. -- including my own -- have been exaggerated. But Hyde does seem, to me anyway, to have shortcomings as a manager. I really don't know whether any of this team's problems could be alleviated by bringing in a new manager with qualities that Hyde lacks. But if Elias is serious about a top-to-bottom review of the team's weaknesses and ways that those weaknesses might be improved on, shouldn't the manager's stewardship  be among the subjects considered? It appears that Elias intends to scrutinize and look for constructive changes throughout the organization. Except the manager. I don't get it.
    • So where did it go wrong, if it’s tough to pin it on bad swing decisions?  I still think an injury (or multiple smaller injuries) is possible, if not probable. Evaluating the possibility of a hand injury, here are his Statcast numbers from the two weeks prior to and following that incident on June 27: 2022-2023: 37.8% hard hit rate; 88.2 MPH avg. EV; .353 wOBA 06/12 - 06/26: 43.8% hard hit rate; 89.8 MPH avg. EV; .356 wOBA 06/28 - 07/14: 20.5% hard hit rate; 83.6 MPH avg. EV; .214 wOBA Coming into June 27, Adley was hitting the ball harder than he ever had. He was actually hitting it even harder in the week prior to June 27 than what I showed above. After that ball off his hand, those hard contact numbers instantly fell off, in a pretty dramatic fashion. And they never really came back.  07/14 - 09/30: 30.0% hard hit rate; 86.9 MPH avg. EV; .258 wOBA I don’t think it’s quite proof positive that he was playing with a broken hand or that type of thing. But it’s very suspicious that his performance immediately fell off a cliff after getting hit with that foul ball and really never again returned to anything approaching normal for him.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...