Jump to content

O's Interested in Juan Uribe


Ven6

Recommended Posts

You do realize that you can hit .290 and be nearly useless, right? It's possible to hit .290 and put fewer runs on the board than someone who hit .190.

Unless you are the NY Yankees most teams aren't going to have "run producers" at every spot in the lineup. However, there is also a need for guys to set the table or get on base. 290 is a lot better than 190 when it comes to doing that. Some of you (hate to say it but you seem to fit the category) seem to assume that LH is a 190 hitter. Why don't you just let him have an opportunity first before writing him off. Just like some prospects do well in the minors and miserably at the major league level (Ryan Minor and Larry Bigbie come to mind) maybe LH is the opposite. YOu just never know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 109
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Maybe at Sunspot, you could get away with posts like that, but the posters here are too smart to let that pass. :cool:

Well if 290 is horrendous then the team average of most teams in the major leagues must be horrendous. I just think that word is a huge exageration for anyone hitting 290. In fact it is beyond stupid using that word to describe that average. Maybe a misleading 290 or even a weak 290 could be substituted, but certainly not "horrendous." Horrendous would be Daniel Cabrera trying to hit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless you are the NY Yankees most teams aren't going to have "run producers" at every spot in the lineup. However, there is also a need for guys to set the table or get on base. 290 is a lot better than 190 when it comes to doing that. Some of you (hate to say it but you seem to fit the category) seem to assume that LH is a 190 hitter. Why don't you just let him have an opportunity first before writing him off. Just like some prospects do well in the minors and miserably at the major league level (Ryan Minor and Larry Bigbie come to mind) maybe LH is the opposite. YOu just never know.

He hit .290, but his OBP was only .300. He needs to do something that he has shown no ability to do, and that is become more patient at the plate.

I honestly don't see how this guy is going to succeed as a major league hitter. If he had shown some ability to get on base in the minors, I might feel a little differently about him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless you are the NY Yankees most teams aren't going to have "run producers" at every spot in the lineup. However, there is also a need for guys to set the table or get on base. 290 is a lot better than 190 when it comes to doing that. Some of you (hate to say it but you seem to fit the category) seem to assume that LH is a 190 hitter. Why don't you just let him have an opportunity first before writing him off. Just like some prospects do well in the minors and miserably at the major league level (Ryan Minor and Larry Bigbie come to mind) maybe LH is the opposite. YOu just never know.

I'll admit that it's in the range of possibilities that Luis Hernandez could hit .250/.290/.290. If Hernandez somehow hit .290 his OBP would probably still only be .325, or below average.

Oh, and Ryan Minor was old for his leagues and had terrible SO/BB numbers even in the low minors. He was never much of a prospect and it would have been a huge surprise if he'd had Cory Snyder's career. It was unremarkable that he didn't. Bigbie's career minor league line of .292/.370/.422 translates very nicely to his career major league performance of .267/.331/.395.

We've been over this ad nauseam, but it's at least counter-intuitive to think a player could be over matched against AA pitchers but fares much better against much better major leaguers. If you can't high jump 6' you probably can't high jump 7', either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless you are the NY Yankees most teams aren't going to have "run producers" at every spot in the lineup. However, there is also a need for guys to set the table or get on base. 290 is a lot better than 190 when it comes to doing that. Some of you (hate to say it but you seem to fit the category) seem to assume that LH is a 190 hitter. Why don't you just let him have an opportunity first before writing him off. Just like some prospects do well in the minors and miserably at the major league level (Ryan Minor and Larry Bigbie come to mind) maybe LH is the opposite. YOu just never know.

Also, there have been players like Jimmy Sheckard who once hit .194 but had a .368 OBP. Even giving Luis Hernandez the benefit of the doubt of his walk rate in the minors he'd have to hit over .300 to beat the OBP some .190 hitters have posted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I was going to post something about this after reading about that on MLBTR this morning. That gives me a lot of hope for Bradish if this kid can come back from a UCL sprain and throw 103. Obviously, reliever vs. starter so who knows. But uplifting to read nonetheless. 
    • Hollocher hit almost exclusively 2nd in the order. The Cubs' 3rd hitters (and it was the Cubs, not the Indians as I previously stated) were mostly Marty Krug, Zeb Terry, and John Kelleher. Krug was awful for a 1922 3rd-place hitter, with an 83 OPS+ in his only season as a MLB regular, but he only struck out 43 times in 524 PAs. Terry was worse, OPS+ing 74, but with just 16 Ks in 571 PAs. And Kelleher was the worst of the bunch, OPS+ing 60, while striking out 14 times in 222 PAs. Cubs manager Reindeer Bill Killefer stuck hard and fast to the old rule of thumb that the catcher should bat 8th, even if it's Bob O'Farrell and he hit .324 with an .880 OPS. Ray Grimes had a 1.014 OPS and batted cleanup. But Hack Miller and his .899 OPS batted mostly 6th. Statz wasn't a terrible leadoff hitter, was one of only a couple players who had a SB% higher than 50%, but was 6th among their regulars in OBP. That's as bad a bunch of #3 hitters as I've seen in a while, yet the Cubs finished 80-74-2. Just goes to show you batting order doesn't really matter. Anyway, back to the main point... yes, I'm sure some of Hollocher's CS were busted hit-and-runs. But nobody that regularly batted behind him struck out in even 7% of PAs so they shoulda been putting the ball in play the vast majority of the time.    
    • Bobby needs to git gud. 
    • How many people actually said they were one of the greatest teams ever?   They did hit the snot out of the ball the first 9 games of the year, mostly in a 6 game series in a very hitter-friendly ball park against a bad pitching staff.  That said, they’re still second in the league in runs per game.  Their pitching has been problematic, yielding 6.50 runs per game.  
    • Gunnar’s base running is in the 99th percentile.  That mess is in the 98th percentile.
    • Yeah, the highlighted section here is really why I agree that the O's will look to minimize losing players to waivers just yet. Things could blow up on them pretty quick. There's a ton of risk with these moves, but they have to find out. The best way to do that is to utilize the options for Akin and Tate, IMO. We'll see! 
    • There are some in this very thread including responses to my post up top. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...