Jump to content

Thirty years on...


Mad Mark

Recommended Posts

We have been quite fixated on the failures of last 10 seasons of Orioles baseball (and rightly so). I believe that fixation has caused us to miss the true extent of the problem, namely that the farm system has been rotting from below for closer to 30 years.

The Orioles drafted Cal Ripken in the second round of the 1978 amateur draft. This summer will mark the 30th anniversary of that signing. I believe it’s a baseball axiom that farm system should produce one quality, major-league ready player each season. Since Cal arrived in 1981, that would mean that the Orioles farm system should have produced, lets say, 26 quality position players through today. A very cursory reckoning on my part can come up with maybe six names.

That’s a pretty colossal failure, and a damning indictment of four owners, countless front office personnel, and thousands of players.

It’s also an indication of how much work Andy MacPhail has in front of him. Not only does he have to break the losing tradition this team has forged at the major league level, he has to completely rebuild the foundation of the organization at the same time. It’s like pouring a new foundation for your home—while you’re living in it!

I hope he’s the right man for the job. I don’t know about you guys, but I’m sure not getting any younger…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 103
  • Created
  • Last Reply

We had a thread last week touch on this, though the argument's still valid and open for discussion. I don't remember who started it. Basically, the OP asserted that the O's downfall began in the early 1980's with reduced focus on the farm system (under the two owners prior to Angelos), a problem that has persisted essentially up until last year (though its effects will be felt for a few years still). It's a good thread, though I don't have the time to find it right now. Basically, I think you're right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Excellent point. Even in our mid-90s renaissance, we were short on homegrown talent. (We had the highest payroll in baseball, however.)

The problems with the O's developing major league ready talent indeed stretches back 30 years. Maybe we've produced 10 players in that time who could be considered above-average hitters or pitchers over, say, a five year stretch? Whatever the count is, it's pretty abysmal.

Maybe because we fans are more savvy and able to communicate in ways we weren't able to in say, the mid-80s, this seems like a recent problem. But it runs very deep. Here's hoping we've turned over a new leaf.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We had a thread last week touch on this, though the argument's still valid and open for discussion. I don't remember who started it. Basically, the OP asserted that the O's downfall began in the early 1980's with reduced focus on the farm system (under the two owners prior to Angelos), a problem that has persisted essentially up until last year (though its effects will be felt for a few years still). It's a good thread, though I don't have the time to find it right now. Basically, I think you're right.

I missed that one. The reason I started this one was that I had made this point in NMS's thread about what it would take to make us forget the last 10 years, and it kind of got rolled past.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Excellent point. Even in our mid-90s renaissance, we were short on homegrown talent. (We had the highest payroll in baseball, however.)

The problems with the O's developing major league ready talent indeed stretches back 30 years. Maybe we've produced 10 players in that time who could be considered above-average hitters or pitchers over, say, a five year stretch? Whatever the count is, it's pretty abysmal.

Maybe because we fans are more savvy and able to communicate in ways we weren't able to in say, the mid-80s, this seems like a recent problem. But it runs very deep. Here's hoping we've turned over a new leaf.

Ah, the Orioles' 1998 payroll...every Yankee$ fans' defense against the charge that they buy their champion$hips...

That was the only season the Orioles payroll was #1 in baseball, IIRC--though we were top 10 during most of the mid-90s--but the rest of your point is valid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have been quite fixated on the failures of last 10 seasons of Orioles baseball (and rightly so). I believe that fixation has caused us to miss the true extent of the problem, namely that the farm system has been rotting from below for closer to 30 years.

The Orioles drafted Cal Ripken in the second round of the 1978 amateur draft. This summer will mark the 30th anniversary of that signing. I believe it’s a baseball axiom that farm system should produce one quality, major-league ready player each season. Since Cal arrived in 1981, that would mean that the Orioles farm system should have produced, lets say, 26 quality position players through today. A very cursory reckoning on my part can come up with maybe six names.

That’s a pretty colossal failure, and a damning indictment of four owners, countless front office personnel, and thousands of players.

It’s also an indication of how much work Andy MacPhail has in front of him. Not only does he have to break the losing tradition this team has forged at the major league level, he has to completely rebuild the foundation of the organization at the same time. It’s like pouring a new foundation for your home—while you’re living in it!

I hope he’s the right man for the job. I don’t know about you guys, but I’m sure not getting any younger

I'm heading south next week and and going past St. Augustine and plan to see if there's any chance to reverse the process. ;)

I'm interested in seeing how AMac starts acquiring young position players to the fold. He has a bunch of pitching and implied in his Bedard news conference that he's going to flip some for fielders. I may be old (but not yet mold) but I am excited. Unfortunately, the game plays out so slow - er - deliberately that I hope I'm here to see the final results.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still don't see how people can say "30 years" when the O's made the WS in '79 and then won it in '83. They were also in the playoffs in 1980. Any slide would have to start with the first losing season which would have been 1986. Screw what was going on in the MiL, because if a team can keep winning at the MLB level with a poor MiL system, I'll take it.

Also, the run from 1992 to 1997 wasn't that bad and resulted in a cumulative 494-410 record.

So yes, overall, the last 25 years have sucked, but there have been times when the team wasn't a disaster.

What sets the pre-1998 suckfest apart from the last ten years is the hope that at any given time, the team could become good again. They sucked in 1991 but were good in 1992. They sucked in 1995 but were good in 1996. These last 10 years have offered little hope, and it's almost as if the owner has purposefully run the team into the ground to benefit his own agenda.

Wait a minute, he did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still don't see how people can say "30 years" when the O's made the WS in '79 and then won it in '83. They were also in the playoffs in 1980. Any slide would have to start with the first losing season which would have been 1986. Screw what was going on in the MiL, because if a team can keep winning at the MLB level with a poor MiL system, I'll take it.

Also, the run from 1992 to 1997 wasn't that bad and resulted in a cumulative 494-410 record.

So yes, overall, the last 25 years have sucked, but there have been times when the team wasn't a disaster.

Clap clap clap! I'm down with the new, improved NMS! :002_scool:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still don't see how people can say "30 years" when the O's made the WS in '79 and then won it in '83. They were also in the playoffs in 1980. Any slide would have to start with the first losing season which would have been 1986. Screw what was going on in the MiL, because if a team can keep winning at the MLB level with a poor MiL system, I'll take it.

Also, the run from 1992 to 1997 wasn't that bad and resulted in a cumulative 494-410 record.

So yes, overall, the last 25 years have sucked, but there have been times when the team wasn't a disaster.

No one is saying the team hasn't ever been good in the past 30 years - the point is that in the last 30 years the team stopped producing homegrown talent, even when it was winning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with Mark. This losing has beena long time in the making. That said, the mid 90's we had top free agents WANTING to come to Baltimore. Then it all stopped. To me, the real moment that this franchise went from a place that players wanted to come, to a place where careers come to die, was when we allowed Mussina to walk away to the MFY! That was the day that will live in infamy to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ripken, Roberts, Finley, Mussina, Bod****er, Olsen, McDonald, Bedard, Benitez, and I'm running out of names.

Lesser names: Harris, Ray, Delucci, Towers, Maine, Hairston, Werth, Goodwin, Pickering, Dempsey's nephew, Cabrera, Bauer, Fontenot, Gutierrez, Alexander, Milacki, Billy Ripken, Sugar Bear?, Hammonds, Bigbie.

Anyone throw out a few more major leaguers who started with us since Ripken?

I hope there is more than this, because this a pathetic list.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For as bad as the system was for the last 30 years, we've still managed to produce a HoF SS (Ripken), two ace pitchers (Mussina, Bedard), another solid SP (Bod****er), a closer (Olson) an AS 2B (Roberts) and a slew of decent players (Finley, Harnisch, McDonald, Hammonds, Segui, Rhodes, Benitez, Markakis)

Granted, that's 14 players in a 30 year span.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ripken, Roberts, Finley, Mussina, Bod****er, Olsen, McDonald, Bedard, Benitez, and I'm running out of names.

Lesser names: Harris, Ray, Delucci, Towers, Maine, Hairston, Werth, Goodwin, Pickering, Dempsey's nephew, Cabrera, Bauer, Fontenot, Gutierrez, Alexander, Milacki, Billy Ripken, Sugar Bear?, Hammonds, Bigbie.

Anyone throw out a few more major leaguers who started with us since Ripken?

I hope there is more than this, because this a pathetic list.

Schilling has had a pretty good career. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Schilling has had a pretty good career. ;)

Schilling began his professional career as a prospect in the Boston farm system, but was traded to the Baltimore Orioles in 1988 for Mike Bodd icker. His major league debut was with the Orioles (1988-1990). He probably does not qualify as an Oriole product, imho.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Well, I guess I need to get to the stadium by 11 AM today to watch Urias and Westburg here in Nashville! The stadium is 50 feet from my office window.
    • No, It is my understanding that he is now a FA. Any team that picks him up is on the hook for prorated minimum this year only. The O's owe him the buy out. 
    • Burnes starting won’t help anyone hit. And I have minimal expectations for Westburg in his very first game back.    We just gave up 15 runs to a pretty damn pedestrian SF lineup last two games. I don’t think a ‘hangover lineup’ is going to help as much as you think. Plus again, if we can’t score it doesn’t matter much what the opposing lineup looks like.    I did just realize we have 10 games left, not 11. 3-7 seems even less likely than 3-8, ha.   
    • Game 1 Corbin Burnes, and Sunday Jordan Westburg and a bullpen game before an off day? We'll see in 10 days, but I think the Tigers run of good play at the end will have helped protect OPACY home field for the ALWC round. Very happy flight for the Tigers, and I'd guess they are asleep at their Baltimore hotel by now, waiting for tomorrow night.    Tigers home next week with two Skubal starts if necessary and a White Sox series, so the Royals and Twins are probably cheering pretty hard for us. If we finish this week 0-4, the Yankees might have that hangover lineup the day after division clinching one of our games there.    It looks pretty likely while we are in New York, the guys will have a front row seat handing over the AL East champion honor.
    • They still need to win a few games to get there. I still don’t understand why people are acting like that is so certain (quoting you but not referring to you, per se).    3-8 in the last 11. 11 games left. In all seriousness, what makes anyone think we can even go 3-8 in the next 11?  We are bad in every single phase of the game and we’re playing against teams who have everything to play for (other than SF today, and they’ve pretty easily handled us this week already).    These last two games against SF, especially last night, have convinced me they’re going to fully blow this. We’ve already shown that Detroit can handle us. Probably going to lose to Webb today. Then it’s NY in NY. When is the last time we beat the Yanks in a late season series that mattered to both teams?  Ever? This team certainly isn’t the one to do it. And then it’s do or die in MIN. Anybody believe we can take 2/3 there?  I just don’t see a path to more than three wins, and even getting three doesn’t seem remotely certain. I think we’ll be lucky to win one game each of these last three series. Maybe that’s enough, but I’m far from sure they can even do that.    What’s the counterpoint to this?  Injury returns?  Too late for that IMO. Just start playing better?  What would make anyone believe that’s going to happen after 3.5 months of bad baseball? For real, someone tell me what they’re seeing that makes them think even 3-8 is going to happen in the next 11. 
    • We traded far too much for what we got in return IMO. You can't totally judge trades this early but as it stands now, Elias gets a well deserved D for his trade deadline performance. I've said this before. He's done a fantastic job bringing this club back to relevancy. I just question some of his roster construction and trade decisions.
    • Since July 1st, the Orioles are 31-37 and since the Trading deadline when Elias was supposed to make the team better they've gone 19-24 (.441). Now grant it the team lost Westburg and Grayson as well as Eflin for a little bit, but what can't be swept under the rug is that Elias traded a decent part of his minor league league prospects and the team has done worse. The acquisitions of Rogers, Jimenez and Soto have not improved the team. Eflin has kept them from being even worse and we have him for next year, and the same goes for Dominguez. Hopefully Soto will figure it out or Elias wasted two pitching prospects (Chace being probably being the one with the most upside of any pitcher traded).  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...