Jump to content

It has now been 21.2 innings since we scored against an opposing team's bullpen.


glenn__davis

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 44
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Well I thought Steve Pearce looked good

He did. He also looked angry. Everyone else seems to be taking this meltdown in stride, with a "Tough loss. But it's a long season, and we'll get 'em tomorrow" attitude. That may have nothing to do with what they're feeling, or how they're reacting in the clubhouse. But it's what I see on the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seemed to me that the Orioles are shut down (3 runs or less) a lot more than you'd expect for a team with a good offense overall.

But I checked using the situational tool of baseballreference.com, and surprisingly the O's offense hasn't been shut down an inordinate number of times this year. They've been held to 3 runs or fewer in 55 games, which is tied for 22nd in MLB.

However, the O's record in those games is 9-46. Their winning percentage when scoring 3 runs or less is 25th in MLB. (The Cardinals are 27-34 when scoring 3 runs or less, which is insane, BTW.)

So it's not so much that the O's offense gets skunked a lot. It's that the O's do very very badly when they don't score at least 4 runs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two teams that do the little things and have really good bullpens. We just don't work the count.

I pointed out in the game thread that Mike Moustakas did something that I never see any Orioles doing. He waited on a pitch, then just put his bat on the ball and poked it the other way for a hit. On that pitch every Oriole that I see would've been swinging from the heels.

The two responses that I got were that we hit a lot more home runs.

I looked it up and we are #8 in runs scored with 547. KC is #9 with 545.

The point is that this year, for all our homers, we aren't outscoring the Royals. With our style we might get 15 runs one game and 3 runs for 5 games in a row. With the Royals' style they'd be more apt to get 5 runs 6 games in a row.

I know which one I'd bet on to win more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seemed to me that the Orioles are shut down (3 runs or less) a lot more than you'd expect for a team with a good offense overall.

But I checked using the situational tool of baseballreference.com, and surprisingly the O's offense hasn't been shut down an inordinate number of times this year. They've been held to 3 runs or fewer in 55 games, which is tied for 22nd in MLB.

However, the O's record in those games is 9-46. Their winning percentage when scoring 3 runs or less is 25th in MLB. (The Cardinals are 27-34 when scoring 3 runs or less, which is insane, BTW.

So it's not so much that the O's offense gets skunked a lot. It's that the O's do very very badly when they don't score at least 4 runs.

I would expect the Cardinals or any NL team to have a better record when scoring 3 or less because 3 runs holds up a lot better in the NL than the AL. That said the Cards record is phenomenal when scoring three or less and is a testament to the good pitching they have, our record is not good and is a testament to how mediocre our starters as a group have been. KG gets a mulligan, he is young, got bounced around a bit this year, but he learning and showing some signs of improvement. The rest other than obviously Chen have been mediocre and inconsistent at best. When you have at best 2/5th of your staff bringing it at any one time, its hard to win consistently and build momentum, its not surprising that eventually the cards come crashing down. As much as the offense can be maddeningly inconsistent, its the starting pitching that has doomed this squad. As surprisingly decent as they were the 2nd half last year, they have been equally bad most of this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I pointed out in the game thread that Mike Moustakas did something that I never see any Orioles doing. He waited on a pitch, then just put his bat on the ball and poked it the other way for a hit. On that pitch every Oriole that I see would've been swinging from the heels.

The two responses that I got were that we hit a lot more home runs.

I looked it up and we are #8 in runs scored with 547. KC is #9 with 545.

The point is that this year, for all our homers, we aren't outscoring the Royals. With our style we might get 15 runs one game and 3 runs for 5 games in a row. With the Royals' style they'd be more apt to get 5 runs 6 games in a row.

I know which one I'd bet on to win more.

This is actually a good argument to NOT shell out a ton of dough for CD and rather to find speedier, more diverse players at multiple positions. We cant expect this team to spend 20+ million to bring back CD and have the money to reshape the rest of the offense, replace Chen and hopefully upgrade another starter because even with Chen this staff was not good enough this year. Its just not realistic.

I would rather let CD walk, resign Pearce relatively cheap and let some combo of Pearce, Walker, Mancini, or another veteran bat fill that hole. I would then bring in a pair of OF who are clear upgrades over what we started last year with. Decent fielder, little speed, some pop, good OBP types. I would bring in a substantial upgrade over Flaherty to back up JJ. I think JJ would benefit from more time off, I think the only way Buck feels good about that is if he has a decent option to turn to. I think it also provides a modicum of better protection if Schoop or Manny goes down god forbid.

I think that is a doable plan on a budget which reality dictates there will be. I think you can create an offense that is a little more diverse and perhaps a little more consistent. They might not outscore this years team but they should be good enough if we improve the pitching. I think with the number of FA pitchers out there, there are going to be opportunities to do that. I also think this approach to things also gives you some leeway to get a guy or two on the market to plug in the rotation and creates the long term flexibility to give Manny an ungodly sum to stay. If your not paying CD 20million dollars 6 years from now, that alone makes keeping Manny long term more realistic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I pointed out in the game thread that Mike Moustakas did something that I never see any Orioles doing. He waited on a pitch, then just put his bat on the ball and poked it the other way for a hit. On that pitch every Oriole that I see would've been swinging from the heels.

The two responses that I got were that we hit a lot more home runs.

I looked it up and we are #8 in runs scored with 547. KC is #9 with 545.

The point is that this year, for all our homers, we aren't outscoring the Royals. With our style we might get 15 runs one game and 3 runs for 5 games in a row. With the Royals' style they'd be more apt to get 5 runs 6 games in a row.

I know which one I'd bet on to win more.

Thank you!!! This is a very good point (which of course is marginalized by the Church of Sabermetrics) and it's a shame that the Orioles' hitters don't take a similar approach. Pitchers don't need to throw strikes to get them out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is actually a good argument to NOT shell out a ton of dough for CD and rather to find speedier, more diverse players at multiple positions. We cant expect this team to spend 20+ million to bring back CD and have the money to reshape the rest of the offense, replace Chen and hopefully upgrade another starter because even with Chen this staff was not good enough this year. Its just not realistic.

I would rather let CD walk, resign Pearce relatively cheap and let some combo of Pearce, Walker, Mancini, or another veteran bat fill that hole. I would then bring in a pair of OF who are clear upgrades over what we started last year with. Decent fielder, little speed, some pop, good OBP types. I would bring in a substantial upgrade over Flaherty to back up JJ. I think JJ would benefit from more time off, I think the only way Buck feels good about that is if he has a decent option to turn to. I think it also provides a modicum of better protection if Schoop or Manny goes down god forbid.

I think that is a doable plan on a budget which reality dictates there will be. I think you can create an offense that is a little more diverse and perhaps a little more consistent. They might not outscore this years team but they should be good enough if we improve the pitching. I think with the number of FA pitchers out there, there are going to be opportunities to do that. I also think this approach to things also gives you some leeway to get a guy or two on the market to plug in the rotation and creates the long term flexibility to give Manny an ungodly sum to stay. If your not paying CD 20million dollars 6 years from now, that alone makes keeping Manny long term more realistic.

I thought about this today, and you're right. We need to sign Cespedes or someone who has pop in the bat and a good starting pitcher like Price or someone of that caliber. No pick is attached to either. But, Chris Davis is a beast....or he can be horrible. Inconstancy is in the name of his game, but he's a beast when he's clicking

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two teams that do the little things and have really good bullpens. We just don't work the count.
The Twins have a decent bullpen and manager who is smart enough to use it right like Buck does.

KC just has some serious horses to trot out. Its not surprising that they have struggled against these two teams BP.

The Twins' bullpen had a 4.22 ERA going into the Orioles series, not good at all. It was surprising they were able to shut us down. It's not surprising that KC has shut us down. They have the best bullpen in the league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Twins' bullpen had a 4.22 ERA going into the Orioles series, not good at all. It was surprising they were able to shut us down. It's not surprising that KC has shut us down. They have the best bullpen in the league.

It is surprising to me that we are currently 0-9 against Minnesota and KC this year. Seriously, we can't win 1 single game against these teams? Just 1 game where we have more runs than they do by the time the 9th inning is over? KC has a great bullpen, but these guys do have ERAs and do give up runs sometimes....someone should let our offense know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I thought Chisholm missed home too. They didn’t appeal tho I don’t think.
    • Now run scores and Yanks take lead. 
    • Inexcusable missed call in NY. Review Cleo at showed Chisholm out at 2nd. They upheld safe call. 
    • Well, good on posters who proved the SSS side of "Guards Ball." I just found it striking in terms of the narrative in that article, which was basically the same as what most around here were complaining the O's lacked: clutch hitting, passing the baton, aggressive running, getting runners in from third, etc. I guess the real bottom line is "whatever works." Which of course varies from case to case. The old Bill James postseason wisdom was that HRs are the ticket, since you face good pitching and get so few hits. So back to you, Elias, keep crunching those numbers...
    • First, the had a jump in 23’ given how terrible they had been previously, which conditions many fans in the marketplace not to care. They simple weren’t relevant for years. So one very good regular season will not undue years of being bad/irrelevant and treating your customers terribly. Next, I think they missed an opportunity in the offseason by not doing enough by way of big/bold attention grabbing moves. Now I acknowledge that this was most likely due to the ownership flux/transition. I believe they got an attendance/marketplace engagement boost when they changed owners and when they traded for Burnes. However, I believe we would have seen more engagement attendance with say a big Gunnar extension and/or bringing in a big time FA.   IMO this would have created more buzz before the season (say around the time people make season tix decisions - IMO before Christmas is when some people make those bigger purchases). All of this is to say, that it will take time and effort on the organizations part because of how bad of a stain that the Angeloses left. I still have friends and colleagues who refuse to support the Orioles and attend games due to the damage that was done. Rubenstien & co are not going to be able to undo 30 years of awfulness overnight. But IMO it is not enough to simply call it “a new chapter”. They have to make new/different actions to distinguish themselves from who the Orioles were/used to be under the Angelos regime.
    • Just checking in on Gameday, Yankees looking incredibly vulnerable.  Should be the Os out there.  Super lame.  Whichever team wins this series I hope gets knocked out by CLE or DET.
    • If the franchise were better, the fan base would be too.  It’s been a rough 40 years.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...