Jump to content

How hard is it to ask a strategic question?


eddie83

Recommended Posts

They asked and he answered: "sixth. He hasn?t recorded an out in the seventh since June 27, 2015 in Toronto, a span of 20 starts.

?He?s carrying good stuff,? said manager Buck Showalter. ?I just didn?t want to take him much over 100 and whatever. But he?s fine. Colby (Lewis), a very similar outing. Just we didn?t pitch the last nine outs as well as they did.?

Showalter said he didn?t want to use three relievers who were needed to win last night?s game, an apparent reference to Brad Brach, Darren O?Day and Zach Britton.

?That kind of put us in a little different ... but you?ve got to use those guys to win a ballgame the night before,? Showalter said." Don't necessarily accept it. http://www.masnsports.com/school-of-roch/2016/04/wrapping-up-an-8-4-loss-1.html

Now I know that Buck sees things that I don't.

But does anyone outside of Buck think Gallardo was "carrying good stuff"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Jim Palmer questioned as did this entire board Buck's decision in the 7th inning. In the post game interview did Jim Hunter even touch on the subject?, no.

I mean it is so insulting to the fans at home. How difficult is it to ask the manger about pitching Gallardo in the 7th inning? There is no point to these interviews at times at all. I don't expect Hunter to be as critical as a fan or newspaper writer but just ask the question. It isn't that difficult.

Buck yo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jim Palmer questioned as did this entire board Buck's decision in the 7th inning. In the post game interview did Jim Hunter even touch on the subject?, no.

I mean it is so insulting to the fans at home. How difficult is it to ask the manger about pitching Gallardo in the 7th inning? There is no point to these interviews at times at all. I don't expect Hunter to be as critical as a fan or newspaper writer but just ask the question. It isn't that difficult.

Buck took a gamble and lost. If it had worked out would you post this question?

Buck took a chance that didnt work out. It's a long season and every manager

takes chances that don't work out sometimes. I am not going to worry about it.

Buck is correct more times than not. IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To me good implies better than average.

Poor --> average --> Good

I was in bed before the seventh (early day today) but what I saw before the seventh wasn't "good".

Buck sees things that we don't is what you said. His definition of the word was that to which I was inquiring.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Buck took a gamble and lost. If it had worked out would you post this question?

Buck took a chance that didnt work out. It's a long season and every manager

takes chances that don't work out sometimes. I am not going to worry about it.

Buck is correct more times than not. IMO

You're missing his point and the point of this thread. Since it didn't work out it was a legitimate question to ask of Buck. Everyone knows managers make mistakes, finding out his thought process may give folks some insight the next time in a similar situation. I hope to heck it doesn't come up again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're missing his point and the point of this thread. Since it didn't work out it was a legitimate question to ask of Buck. Everyone knows managers make mistakes, finding out his thought process may give folks some insight the next time in a similar situation. I hope to heck it doesn't come up again.

Thank you. I was glad the beat writers wrote about it. Last night I was referring to Jim Hunter. The whole game turned that inning and it was a legitimate question.

I did get mad last year the last game of the Twins series when Buck pinch hit for Flaherty and the Twins tied it and later on Hardy hurt himself worse than he already was. To me it was the lead question and nobody asked it, Buck actually covered it himself without being prompted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which makes me wonder why he tried to get more out of him.

He knew today's game was going to, in all probability, be canceled.

Perhaps a reliever has a nagging injury he doesn't want to discuss. I still don't get why he used Brach the night before. I get O'Day and I assume he didn't want Zach with 4 nights off straight.

I do wonder how he will use Bundy. Will he use him back to back some? They had lefties up and Matusz isn't back. Perhaps he didn't trust Givens there, not sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I went to a few games this year, but here are the reasons I didn't go to the WC games: The team had been an absolute bummer to watch for 3 entire months out of the season and to be honest by the time the playoffs got here I was exhausted and annoyed. The brand of baseball they had been employing for half the season (over-reliance on the home run, terrible ABs, iffy defense) frankly sucked to watch, even on TV, and I'm already spending money to watch them on TV. I wanted them to prove they could get past the WC round before I shelled out more money. I imagine a lot of people share these reasons with me. 
    • People whining about 41k attendance and blaming it on the city have no idea what they're talking about.  Why were there 47k+ of Game 1 against the Rangers last year? Did the city all of a sudden not matter then? It was also a day game. Alas, it was on a Saturday. And they had that locked up for awhile. Why has attendance went up YoY? Look at the Astros and the Brewers. They had *less* people at their G1 games. Is Milwaukee not a nice city? Is Houston not a nice city?  This is pretty simple. It was a day game during a weekday with crappy weather coming off a pretty lackluster performance going into the playoffs. And folks didn't know if there'd even be a home game until, what, barely a week before?  People like winners. Miami is an awesome city. They got a new stadium when it first opened. But guess what? That team stunk in fairly short order upon stadium opening and attendance tanked. 
    • Would love to bring him back on a 1 year deal for anywhere from $3-$7m.  Great depth arm. Don't pencil him into the 5th starter role. This club needs to pickup two starters: a TOR arm and a BOR arm. Have an open competition for the 5th spot. If Suarez doesn't make it, he'd be a great middle reliever arm. Open competition between Free Agent, Suarez, Povich, McDermott, and Rogers. Do not just go into 2025 penciling Rogers into any role. 
    • It's really tough to set a top priority when I don't know what the budget is. I think the new ownership group will be investing more than the previous regime, I just don't know by how much. I highly doubt the O's will ever be in the "spend whatever it takes mode" like the Mets a couple years ago or the standard yearly overspending by the Dodgers or Yanks. It's still tough to make my Christmas list without knowing the balance sheet. If we're the Dodgers, we keep Burnes and Tony Taters. Hopes and wishes it is then: Even if we sign Burnes, which I wouldn't mind at least making a run at him, I think we need another starter, because injuries and how this year went. Even if the Mountain returns healthy, we need high leverage help in the pen. Veteran bat - no idea who, but if Mullins and Santander leave, we will have to add someone -- I don't know that our prospects will be stepping up or stepping back next year.
    • What I like about Webb is he has an excellent changeup and can get LHB's out. Besides Felix, everyone else in the bullpen needs to be matched up. I think it is important to have another reliable guy who can be brought in to any situation. He is also cheap. I think he is too valuable to just give him away to another team. I like him better than Perez for sure. 
    • Bingo....I have said this before also. Wives of players are not clamoring to come near B-More. Factor in taxes and its a hard sell.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...