Jump to content

The rise and fall of Rafael Palmeiro


xian4

Recommended Posts

I've always felt that greenies just keep a guy perky and alert sort of like caffeine. Meanwhile steroids are more for being able to work out longer to build up muscle and in some cases recover from injuries faster. Due to that, I think the difference is vast.

I think the main difference is Mays and Aaron used greenies. So they don't do much because they're Willie and Hank and they're good guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 225
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Don't confuse the writer's take with Raffy's, just to suit your agenda. I don't blame him for being depressed. If he thought he was innocent why wouldn't he ask for help from Selig and Bush? And he should be in the HOF. One of the four with 500 HR and 3000 H. That's a joke.

The bullet points I listed are facts and quotes reported in the article. They don't represent a take or interpretation. "Woe is me" is my interpretation and you can disagree with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pound of heroin and pound of pot will both get you good time. Not all things are right.
Heroin is less physically damaging to the body than speed or coke. If no distinction is made in the penalty then no distinction should be made in the severity of the transgression. Willie and Hank are just as guilty as Raffy.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heroin is less physically damaging to the body than speed or coke. If no distinction is made in the penalty then no distinction should be made in the severity of the transgression. Willie and Hank are just as guilty as Raffy.

But they were never chemically as enhanced. I am not concerned about guilt. At all. Just enhancement. Beyond human means.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heroin is less physically damaging to the body than speed or coke. If no distinction is made in the penalty then no distinction should be made in the severity of the transgression. Willie and Hank are just as guilty as Raffy.

BTW, great switch up of the metaphor. Good choices.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think as long as guys like Raffy, Bonds, Clemens deny they did steroids, then they're never going to gain forgiveness. You have to admit your error before anyone will forgive you.

I'm ready to forgive Raffy. I'm ready for him to be an Oriole again. He was one hell of a player for us. So, I just want him to say, I did steroids like other guys during the era and I'm really really sorry.

I guess we're not there yet...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think as long as guys like Raffy, Bonds, Clemens deny they did steroids, then they're never going to gain forgiveness. You have to admit your error before anyone will forgive you.

I'm ready to forgive Raffy. I'm ready for him to be an Oriole again. He was one hell of a player for us. So, I just want him to say, I did steroids like other guys during the era and I'm really really sorry.

I guess we're not there yet...

How were Brian Roberts and David Ortiz able to get past that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think as long as guys like Raffy, Bonds, Clemens deny they did steroids, then they're never going to gain forgiveness. You have to admit your error before anyone will forgive you.

I'm ready to forgive Raffy. I'm ready for him to be an Oriole again. He was one hell of a player for us. So, I just want him to say, I did steroids like other guys during the era and I'm really really sorry.

I guess we're not there yet...

What if he actually didn't intentionally use steroids though? Not that I think he is innocent but the case against Palmeiro is thinner than that of Bonds and Clemens. I think there is at least a small chance that Palmeiro didn't knowingly use steroids. I think there is a much, much, larger chance that he is in denial and possibly even a sociopath. But it is tough to demand that someone admit an error that they didn't make.

Personally I think they should all go into the Hall as among the best players of their era and let God sort them out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've always felt that greenies just keep a guy perky and alert sort of like caffeine. Meanwhile steroids are more for being able to work out longer to build up muscle and in some cases recover from injuries faster. Due to that, I think the difference is vast.

I have seen much player testimony and other experts that would strongly disagree with your statement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I went to a few games this year, but here are the reasons I didn't go to the WC games: The team had been an absolute bummer to watch for 3 entire months out of the season and to be honest by the time the playoffs got here I was exhausted and annoyed. The brand of baseball they had been employing for half the season (over-reliance on the home run, terrible ABs, iffy defense) frankly sucked to watch, even on TV, and I'm already spending money to watch them on TV. I wanted them to prove they could get past the WC round before I shelled out more money. I imagine a lot of people share these reasons with me. 
    • People whining about 41k attendance and blaming it on the city have no idea what they're talking about.  Why were there 47k+ of Game 1 against the Rangers last year? Did the city all of a sudden not matter then? It was also a day game. Alas, it was on a Saturday. And they had that locked up for awhile. Why has attendance went up YoY? Look at the Astros and the Brewers. They had *less* people at their G1 games. Is Milwaukee not a nice city? Is Houston not a nice city?  This is pretty simple. It was a day game during a weekday with crappy weather coming off a pretty lackluster performance going into the playoffs. And folks didn't know if there'd even be a home game until, what, barely a week before?  People like winners. Miami is an awesome city. They got a new stadium when it first opened. But guess what? That team stunk in fairly short order upon stadium opening and attendance tanked. 
    • Would love to bring him back on a 1 year deal for anywhere from $3-$7m.  Great depth arm. Don't pencil him into the 5th starter role. This club needs to pickup two starters: a TOR arm and a BOR arm. Have an open competition for the 5th spot. If Suarez doesn't make it, he'd be a great middle reliever arm. Open competition between Free Agent, Suarez, Povich, McDermott, and Rogers. Do not just go into 2025 penciling Rogers into any role. 
    • It's really tough to set a top priority when I don't know what the budget is. I think the new ownership group will be investing more than the previous regime, I just don't know by how much. I highly doubt the O's will ever be in the "spend whatever it takes mode" like the Mets a couple years ago or the standard yearly overspending by the Dodgers or Yanks. It's still tough to make my Christmas list without knowing the balance sheet. If we're the Dodgers, we keep Burnes and Tony Taters. Hopes and wishes it is then: Even if we sign Burnes, which I wouldn't mind at least making a run at him, I think we need another starter, because injuries and how this year went. Even if the Mountain returns healthy, we need high leverage help in the pen. Veteran bat - no idea who, but if Mullins and Santander leave, we will have to add someone -- I don't know that our prospects will be stepping up or stepping back next year.
    • What I like about Webb is he has an excellent changeup and can get LHB's out. Besides Felix, everyone else in the bullpen needs to be matched up. I think it is important to have another reliable guy who can be brought in to any situation. He is also cheap. I think he is too valuable to just give him away to another team. I like him better than Perez for sure. 
    • Bingo....I have said this before also. Wives of players are not clamoring to come near B-More. Factor in taxes and its a hard sell.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...