Jump to content

O's acquire Steve Pearce for Jonah Heim


McLovin

Recommended Posts

For everyone that's upset about losing Heim, I think Wieters is going to be here for the next few years with Joseph backing him up. I just don't see how we're going to be able to replace MW, and I don't think we'll have to.

I disagree. I honestly don't even know how many more years Matt has as a catcher. He's looked pretty brutal of late.

I firmly believe that the O's intend for Sisco to become their ultimate future at catcher. If he requires further work defensively, they'll start Joseph and find someone to fill in behind him in 2017.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 230
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I disagree. I honestly don't even know how many more years Matt has as a catcher. He's looked pretty brutal of late.

I firmly believe that the O's intend for Sisco to become their ultimate future at catcher. If he requires further work defensively, they'll start Joseph and find someone to fill in behind him in 2017.

I think they will find someone to start and keep Joseph as the backup.

I don't see how you can go into 2017 with the plan of having Joseph starting 120 games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they will find someone to start and keep Joseph as the backup.

I don't see how you can go into 2017 with the plan of having Joseph starting 120 games.

Joseph isn't the catcher, that he was, last season.

I sure how, there is a plan B for 2017 that doesn't have Sisco at the top of the list.

Not sure he will be ready yet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pearce has 1 HR and 2 RBI over his last month

He is streaky and often injured

For all the talk of where Heim is on the depth chart, I keep hearing that he is the only guy

with the defensive chops to be guaranteed to be able to stay at C in the majors

I do not like the trade

Flirting with negative rep for that. Misleads people into thinking Pearce has really struggled for a month when in fact he has all of 30 at-bats. Bad post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Joseph isn't the catcher, that he was, last season.

I sure how, there is a plan B for 2017 that doesn't have Sisco at the top of the list.

Not sure he will be ready yet

That's all well and good, but I severely doubt Matt Wieters will ever wear the orange and black again after 2016 wraps up. They were ready to cut bait with him this year, he just surprised everyone one by taking the QO...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's all well and good, but I severely doubt Matt Wieters will ever wear the orange and black again after 2016 wraps up. They were ready to cut bait with him this year, he just surprised everyone one by taking the QO...

I agree, I don't look for it, like I didn't look for it, this season.

Some posters are pretty quick to annoint Sisco the new heir, and I think there is a gap between Matt leaving here and Sisco ready for the everyday starting job as the big C.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree, I don't look for it, like I didn't look for it, this season.

Some posters are pretty quick to annoint Sisco the new heir, and I think there is a gap between Matt leaving here and Sisco ready for the everyday starting job as the big C.

Fair. I just don't see them investing much in the position so long as they view Sisco as the heir apparent, even if they don't envision him getting here until 2018. Joseph is under control. Maybe they bring in a one-year guy. Nick Hundley is among the names that will be available next year, and we know the organization is fond of him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree. I honestly don't even know how many more years Matt has as a catcher. He's looked pretty brutal of late.

I firmly believe that the O's intend for Sisco to become their ultimate future at catcher. If he requires further work defensively, they'll start Joseph and find someone to fill in behind him in 2017.

Do you mean since he got hit in the foot by a pitch in New York? Is that his fault?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fangraphs rates it as the fifth best buy of the deadline.

http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/the-best-buys-of-the-trade-deadline/

Even though several higher-profile sluggers were moved at the deadline, I think you could make a pretty decent argument that the Orioles landed the best hitter traded in July. I’ve been a Pearce fan for a while, labeling him one of my off-season bargains, and he lived up to the billing by mashing the ball in Tampa for the first half of the season. Pearce is 33 and will probably never shake the label of being a part-time player, but he can really hit, and doesn’t embarrass himself in the field like some other sluggers who fetched more impressive prospects in return.

That the Orioles were able to land a guy with this kind of offensive ability for a just catcher who looks like he’s going to top as a backup if he gets to the big leagues is fairly impressive. I’d take Pearce over Jay Bruce for the rest of the season, for instance, and Bruce cost the Mets a guy with some actual value. Pearce is worthy of an everyday job, but because he’s still seen as a part-time guy, the Orioles got him for bench player prices. To maximize the value from this trade, and their chances of reaching October, they should just put him in the lineup everyday, and celebrate landing a quality hitter at almost no cost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, he's not as good of a hitter as Carlos Beltran, but oh well. He's still good, and should absolutely play over Reimold from here on out.

Yeah, for whatever reasons Beltran hasn't gotten the credit he deserves. Dude's a HOFer. Did it all on the field - power, defense, speed, 1500 runs and rbi's, 16 post-season homers, 142 career OF assist. And he's still got a 133 OPS+ this year. He ain't done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • If they were going to get rid of Fuller they should have done it a month and a half ago. The issues with our hitting were apparent the whole second half of the season. Maybe a firing or two would have sent a message to the players prior to their postseason fizzle. . 
    • What does Eflin and Jimenez signify? It was a very small addition to the payroll. John Angelos would have approved that, if he needed to approve anything at all.
    • I'm not sure that's quite it.  Well, more importantly, I'm not sure that's quite it for me. I absolutely want to win more in the playoffs.  At this point there's no question that for me I'd live through some lousy seasons if it guaranteed a World Series trophy.  I'd give up a lot for that. But unfortunately it's the weird paradox, especially in baseball, where the games that mean so much in terms of perception actually mean very little.   Just look at some the threads posted on this board in recent weeks. "Do the Orioles need more experience"?  (studies have shown this is not the case) "Maybe they need a certain type of hitter/approach!" (no, studies have shown that's not it either) "They must need to build their bullpen a certain way." (nope) "Well you have to be playing well in September to have a chance in October!"  (very much not true) "It must be those nice white boys need somebody to be a jerk" (OK, no real way to quantify that one :)) The Astros must have the secret sauce, they went to the ALCS a lot of times in a row!  Oh, they lost in the 1st round this year. Study after study after study shows that there is no pattern.  There is no "right" way to do it.  There's no way to predict from year to year which teams will or will not go on the run. If for that crazy 8-9th inning on the day after the season the Mets may not have even made the playoffs.  Now they're the example of guys that can "get it done". It's not an excuse, and frankly it's not really my opinion.  It's reality. I do 100% agree with your last 2 sentences.  I don't know what we've done to so displease the baseball gods.
    • It's definitely a possibility, but I wonder if there is actually something going on between Hyde and some players, would it be smart to bring his potential replacement in and subject him to the problem?    The fans, mostly here are the main source of BB being a manager. He's definitely had some MiL success so it's not unreasonable to assume he will be a manager someday. 
    • I think this is spot on in every way.  But I think the fanbase is somewhat divided on how important playoff success is. Put another way, for you, me, and a lot of folks, the playoffs mean a ton.  41 years with no championship or even a pennant is a real long time, and the narrative of the Orioles since 1983 has gotten extremely old. Even the narrative of this winless recent edition of the Os has gotten old. For other fans, the regular season means much more and winning/losing in the playoffs doesn't carry much weight because of the nature of the tournament.   There is no right or wrong way to be a fan of a team. But I can say that if you told me the next 10 years would involve 9 seasons where we lose 90+ games and 1 season where we win the World Series, I will gladly sign up for that.  I am definitely at that point where that title means everything to me and yes 29 teams go home without the ring each year, but 1 team does get it and that needs to be us. And if we get "lucky" like the Tigers on the path there, then bring it on! If the playoffs are a crapshoot, I am tired of that crapshoot rewarding everyone else.
    • More than once Fredi displayed a lack of control that cost him his job. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...