Jump to content

O's acquire Steve Pearce for Jonah Heim


McLovin

Recommended Posts

Pearce has a very extreme platoon split this season...1.212 OPS vs LHP and .799 vs. RHP. It's only 53 ABs vs. LHP, but still.

Given the season he is having, I'm not sure he'll sit versus anyone, but Buck may use him off the bench to reduce effectiveness of matchup LOOGY vs. either Davis or Alvarez.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 230
  • Created
  • Last Reply
They won't DFA Ubaldo.

It'll most likely be Reimold DFA for Pearce and Ondrusek optioned for Miley.

Wilson could also go back down.

And I think they might go back to a 12 man pitching staff since we now have the ability to move Worley or Bundy back to the pen and added a starter who is likely to go deeper into games than the guys he is replacing.

So if they get rid of two pitchers:

-- Wilson & Ondrusek?

Or does Ubaldo finally bite the dust?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I think you have to go by the 2016 version of him, right? I mean the guy is back to hitting and although he certainly could regress, he's still better than Reimold and or Rickart. I don't think this is a game changing move, and it might not move the needle all that much, but the team is improved and that's all you can ask during the trading deadline trades.

He's got a 342 BABIP Tony, I'm not going by his 2016 numbers. I mean I'll include them in the total package but you have to expect him to regress. Just hopefully not to the extent Parra did last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But the 2016 Pearce, to date, falls within the spectrum of the 2014 and 2015 versions.

Unless you think he is having a better year than 2014?

He has a .908 OPS this year. What more can we want in a deadline trade? Even if he had an .808 OPS this it'd probably be worth it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Davis really forces the issue then perhaps Trumbo at first occasionally and Pearce in the OF.

Nope. You don't pay 17 million to someone to sit on the bench. Plus it affects his mindset for next year, the year after, etc. Plus his defense has been OUTSTANDING.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wilson could also go back down.

And I think they might go back to a 12 man pitching staff since we now have the ability to move Worley or Bundy back to the pen and added a starter who is likely to go deeper into games than the guys he is replacing.

So if they get rid of two pitchers:

-- Wilson & Ondrusek?

Or does Ubaldo finally bite the dust?

Reimold and Pearce on the roster is redundant.

Ubaldo will never bite the dust unless it's mid season next year. He'll be stashed in the bullpen only to be used in blowouts or until the last possible option in an extra innings game. When September comes around, he'll be further buried.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wilson could also go back down.

And I think they might go back to a 12 man pitching staff since we now have the ability to move Worley or Bundy back to the pen and added a starter who is likely to go deeper into games than the guys he is replacing.

So if they get rid of two pitchers:

-- Wilson & Ondrusek?

Or does Ubaldo finally bite the dust?

I would rather see Tyler Wilson in the regular rotation at Norfolk for his development and keep Ondrusek, Worley or Bundy in the pen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope. You don't pay 17 million to someone to sit on the bench. Plus it affects his mindset for next year, the year after, etc. Plus his defense has been OUTSTANDING.

Agreed, Davis isn't sitting. The only thing Pearce will do for Davis is maybe get the poor guy a day off from time to time, which he (and the team's other stars) haven't really had much opportunity for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Provides a nice upgrade to a team that in spite of all the right handed bats, ranks just 26th in wOBA versus LHP as opposed to 3rd in wOBA versus RHP. Pearce has a .502 wOBA versus LHP this year among which is best in the MLB among batters with 50 PA or more against lefties (not to mention, pretty solid numbers versus righties too). Plus he's the proverbial "great clubhouse guy". Nice work, Duquette

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We had 3 "needs"

LH SP

RH OF

LOOGY

We got the two most important and gave up a 27 year old lefty and a career .200 milb C. Not too shabby.

And due to Ondrusek typically being better vs LH, we at least improved in the LOOGY department a bit without actually getting a LOOGY.

Getting Miley also means at least 20% of the games we'll have less need for a LH reliever because we'll have started a lefty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pearce is a very streaky player, but I fully expect him to mash lefties when he is in the lineup.

I really wouldn't mind seeing Davis sit a couple times a week until he gets his stroke back. Like to see Pearce get three to four starts a week. Hopefully ignite our lineup some.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope. You don't pay 17 million to someone to sit on the bench. Plus it affects his mindset for next year, the year after, etc. Plus his defense has been OUTSTANDING.

You pay someone $17 million a year to sit on the bench occasionally until they start hitting. Davis seems like the kind of guy that rises to the challenge eventually after struggling, but he also seems like the kind of guy that might need more of a breather every so often.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • If they were going to get rid of Fuller they should have done it a month and a half ago. The issues with our hitting were apparent the whole second half of the season. Maybe a firing or two would have sent a message to the players prior to their postseason fizzle. . 
    • What does Eflin and Jimenez signify? It was a very small addition to the payroll. John Angelos would have approved that, if he needed to approve anything at all.
    • I'm not sure that's quite it.  Well, more importantly, I'm not sure that's quite it for me. I absolutely want to win more in the playoffs.  At this point there's no question that for me I'd live through some lousy seasons if it guaranteed a World Series trophy.  I'd give up a lot for that. But unfortunately it's the weird paradox, especially in baseball, where the games that mean so much in terms of perception actually mean very little.   Just look at some the threads posted on this board in recent weeks. "Do the Orioles need more experience"?  (studies have shown this is not the case) "Maybe they need a certain type of hitter/approach!" (no, studies have shown that's not it either) "They must need to build their bullpen a certain way." (nope) "Well you have to be playing well in September to have a chance in October!"  (very much not true) "It must be those nice white boys need somebody to be a jerk" (OK, no real way to quantify that one :)) The Astros must have the secret sauce, they went to the ALCS a lot of times in a row!  Oh, they lost in the 1st round this year. Study after study after study shows that there is no pattern.  There is no "right" way to do it.  There's no way to predict from year to year which teams will or will not go on the run. If for that crazy 8-9th inning on the day after the season the Mets may not have even made the playoffs.  Now they're the example of guys that can "get it done". It's not an excuse, and frankly it's not really my opinion.  It's reality. I do 100% agree with your last 2 sentences.  I don't know what we've done to so displease the baseball gods.
    • It's definitely a possibility, but I wonder if there is actually something going on between Hyde and some players, would it be smart to bring his potential replacement in and subject him to the problem?    The fans, mostly here are the main source of BB being a manager. He's definitely had some MiL success so it's not unreasonable to assume he will be a manager someday. 
    • I think this is spot on in every way.  But I think the fanbase is somewhat divided on how important playoff success is. Put another way, for you, me, and a lot of folks, the playoffs mean a ton.  41 years with no championship or even a pennant is a real long time, and the narrative of the Orioles since 1983 has gotten extremely old. Even the narrative of this winless recent edition of the Os has gotten old. For other fans, the regular season means much more and winning/losing in the playoffs doesn't carry much weight because of the nature of the tournament.   There is no right or wrong way to be a fan of a team. But I can say that if you told me the next 10 years would involve 9 seasons where we lose 90+ games and 1 season where we win the World Series, I will gladly sign up for that.  I am definitely at that point where that title means everything to me and yes 29 teams go home without the ring each year, but 1 team does get it and that needs to be us. And if we get "lucky" like the Tigers on the path there, then bring it on! If the playoffs are a crapshoot, I am tired of that crapshoot rewarding everyone else.
    • More than once Fredi displayed a lack of control that cost him his job. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...