Jump to content

Looking ahead to 2017


ChuckS

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Ubaldo will get another chance.
Over who?

I think he's traded after August 1 or DFA'd.

I wish he were gone but I predict Aristotelian is right. Dan made this bed and Pete is gonna make him lie in it to the end of the contract IMHO. Until then either Jimmy's on the 25-man or he's on the 60-day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mike Wright, out of options? I think when he is transition ed to the bullpen we will see him flourish ala Tommy Hunter.

Also I see no way the reigns to DH are handed to Mancini. I see two possibilities. First, Pedro is retained but TOR, NY and Texas could all be looking for a DH (the first two scare me). Second, some low cost "professional hitter" is brought in.

Wright, Wilson, Drake, Walker, and Aquino all have one option left for next year.

Pena and McFarland are both out of options next year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree strongly with you on points 1 and 2, especially 2. Wieters is a strong presence on this team in a lot of areas.

How do we afford to sign Wieters to an extension with all the arbitration increases plus the salary allocated to whoever we sign to play RF?

We will be looking at a payroll approaching 200 mil. I don't see how that can happen. We need more cheap/cost controlled players on our 25 man roster. Signing a 31 year old catcher to a long term deal is a bad idea and paying a guy with a sub .700 OPS bat 16.7 mil for one year is an even worse idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quite simply you cut payroll. Trumbo and Alvarez are gone along with six other players would save us $26.8 million. You then need to figure out how you can rid yourself of Jimenez and Gallardo, who collectively knock down $22 million. Granted won't be easy but there are ways to get creative.

No, you aren't getting rid of Jimenez and Gallardo without eating their salaries or taking equal salary back in a trade.

The arbitration raises could increase the payroll 30 million on their own. There goes your savings from Trumbo and Alvarez. Who are the few others you speak of anyway? We don't have any other expiring contracts. Oh, and people expect us to extend Manny and Tillman too. Where is all this money going to come from?

The best option is to platoon Sisco and Caleb or bring in another (cheap catcher) if they feel Sisco is not ready defensively. .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • What you want is perfectly reasonable.  But you seem entirely to focused on money.  The team needs to work to improve.  I don't care what it costs, you shouldn't either.  They are going to spend money and payroll will be higher next year and the year after that.  We need them to make improvements and some of that is rightfully going to come from within and not cost much. The improvements that are needed are going to cost too, I'm not saying they wont.  But ownership and the GM should simply work in tandem to make sure the team has what it needs.  I am not really concerned about how much that costs because it should be able to be done without jumping this particular team into say top ten in payroll.
    • This is the right approach. the orioles should be spending more money and I believe they will, but I expect it to be measured with less risk (ie we won’t be handing out a Hader type deal or a  long term contract to Santander IMO) improving on some of the obvious weaknesses certainly makes sense.    1x SP: Burnes, Fried, Buehler 1x RH OF/DH: Martinez, O’Neill, Profar 1x 1B: (wishlist) Alonso, Walker
    • Interesting. I had forgotten that they signed him and then got him in the pitching lab in the offseason. Since September is prior to the end of the season, I would take "two year contract" to mean September '23 is Year 1, and then '24 is Year 2.  That is a cool article. Very encouraging how closely they are following the KBO. 
    • I think most teams would want to have an MVP candidate at quarterback.   Most of the time this will mean that he is better than the guy they currently have.  That's why. My quote was not taking salary into account.  If you take his current salary into account I think you are still talking about a majority of the NFL teams that would take him right now.  If the salary is an issue you find a way to make it work.  I'm starting to come around to the idea that the salary cap is kinda fake in a way after I keep seeing teams do stuff like adding void years other trickery to get the guys they want.
    • Well I sort of disagree here. You said guys have been bad to questionable. I think that’s wrong. I just think a few guys have been awful and that has really hurt us. I would absolutely give Washington more time. Brade and Kane are well liked but doubtful they want to play them much right now. A trade should be considered if things don’t improve.
    • Yeah, I'd rather keep him over Soto.  I mean Soto can't start.  Yes Soto was dominant at times out of the bullpen but he was also gasoline on a fire out of the bullpen.  I would rather pay Suarez $4 or 5 million, knowing he can start or pitch in the bullpen than Soto, knowing he can only start and is liable to melt down when needed most.  
    • It is funny how much Hays (the pre-2024 version anyway) matches the type of player they'll likely look for. I doubt that reunion happens though. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...