Jump to content

Will Edwin Jackson help?


wildcard

Recommended Posts

I fully expect the Edwin Jackson will be called up to the Orioles today.    He has an up and down history.  He will probably be used as a reliever.   His 2015 numbers as a reliever are encouraging.   4-3,  55.2 IP, 3.07 ERA,  44 H, 21 BB, 40 SO, 1.168 WHIP.

Last year he was used as a starter by San Diego and that didn't work.  (5.89 ERA).  He has a short stint with the Braves and did well in relief until he had two poor games in early May the wreaked  his ERA (5.91).   

He has a 3.10 ERA in 12 games this year at AAA Norfolk.    Walks have been his biggest problem but he has not walked anyone in his last three games so maybe is rounding into playing shape.

Jackson is 33 years old.

What do you think?  Does he help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply

From Roch's blog:

Pitcher Edwin Jackson remains the most logical choice based on need and the lesser degree of difficulty. The Orioles can remove a reliever without any hassle and bring up a fresh arm that can assist at any stage of a game.

Jackson has started in the past and is able to provide length. He’s thrown three innings for the Tides on two occasions, which qualifies as long relief in the majors. His mid-90s fastball and a slider could make him a weapon later in the game.

The lack of a minor league option has no bearing on the Orioles’ decision. If Jackson is good, they’re going to hold onto him. If he can’t get anyone out, he’ll be thanked and shown the door.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Frobby said:

He might turn out to be a slight upgrade as a middle reliever, but he's not going to solve any glaring problem.     It's starting pitching that's the big problem.    

Starting pitching may not be as bad as it seems.

Bundy and Miley are doing fine.  

Gausman had a decent May.  3 quality starts.  One where he went 5.1 IP and allowed 2 runs.  One in Boston where he was ejected in the first inning and one stinker.  

Asher maybe able to become the 4th starter.

Tillman is getting better as the weather gets hotter.  His shoulder has trouble getting loose to start the game.  Hot weather helps.  He is not going to be the  Tillman that led the staff but he might not have to be. If he can go 6 innings give up 3 earned run in 100 pitches I will take that.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, wildcard said:

Starting pitching may not be as bad as it seems.

Bundy and Miley are doing fine.  

Gausman had a decent May.  3 quality starts.  One where he went 5.1 IP and allowed 2 runs.  One in Boston where he was ejected in the first inning and one stinker.  

Asher maybe able to become the 4th starter.

Tillman is getting better as the weather gets hotter.  His shoulder has trouble getting loose to start the game.  Hot weather helps.  He is not going to be the  Tillman that led the staff but he might not have to be. If he can go 6 innings give up 3 earned run in 100 pitches I will take that.

 

Bundy is fine, yes.

Miley, we all know will regress some. He's had a fair bit of luck, given his sky-high walk rate. He's actually putting guys on base at the highest rate since his rookie year in 2011. I'm grateful for what he's produced so far, but I don't expect this guy to stay where he is.

Gausman, I'd generally agree with. His May was a big step forward after a disastrous April. Hopefully he can continue to level off.

Asher, jury's out on. Not going to count on him.

Tillman has not looked particularly impressive. Worried about him.

And, of course, any of these guys could get hurt at any time, because they're starting pitchers and that happens. We definitely need more depth here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DirtyBird said:

Rather go with younger prospect with higher upside.

No interest in anything other than getting outs at the MLB level this season. Not concerned about progression or development. Myself. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the grand scheme of things he won't matter all that much. His somewhat recent MLB success as reliever was skewed by a unusual stretch of 25ish innings with the Braves where he had a .157 BABIP.  He walks too many guys and his combination of low K% and GB% would likely put him at the mercy of the O's corner outfielders too often.  I can't see where his splits give you any sort match up play. 

I guess he can be serviceable as the guy that chews up some innings when the SP can't make it through 4, but that isn't exactly lofty expectations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our bullpen options beyond O'Day, Britton and Givens are so bad right now that I don't see any harm in giving Edwin Jackson a shot.  Right now we have no chance to come back in a game in which we're behind in the middle innings, because Buck has to save his good guys for protecting leads, and guys like Mike Wright and Donnie Hart can't be counted on to keep a game close.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Javy Baez has been on 5 playoff teams including a World Series winner and an LCS team.  128 postseason plate appearances. Mark Canha has been on 5 playoff teams and has 54 postseason plate appearances. Gio Urshela has been on 4 playoff teams and in an LCS and has 88 postseason plate appearances. Those 3 guys may not be big postseason contributors right now but that doesn't mean they aren't providing some amount of leadership by example.   They did have 1000 PAs among them this year for the Tigers.
    • Of course the question asked in that article doesn't really directly answer what a lot of people are talking about. No one is saying we want to have a roster full of guys with experience. But some have suggested that have a team almost completely devoid of guys who have had postseason success, might lead to a bunch of young players who lack role models and mentors and leaders who can help them the first time they face the pressure of the postseason, which really is a totally different animal than the 162 game regular season grind. Anecdotally, there are many guys from the 1966 Orioles (which was a pretty young team) who talked about how Frank came in and "taught us how to win". Anecdotally, back in the days of the "Oriole way", players talked about coming into the organization and learning from veterans how to conduct yourself and how to play the game the right way.   It's hard to have that when you have a total gutting/rebuild of a franchise.    Anecdotally, in the book Astroball, which I read quite a few years ago but I think I remember this part, they talked about the front office coming to the realization that they needed to bring in some veteran leadership, and specifically targeting Carlos Beltran for that reason. Maybe the anecdotes are BS.   Maybe guys just make up narratives after something is successful.   But these ARE human beings, not just a sequence of stats and numbers.   It makes sense that, especially with young players who have never dealt with failure much, the pressure of the postseason could become an isssue and it might be nice to have some wise old heads to lean on. We have a core of young players who have basically been eagerly awaited by fans, told that they are the basis of the next winning franchise, and greeted with adulation.   They came into a team that had minimal veteran leadership and no postseason experience.   They are managed by a manager who has been a coach on winning teams but has never managed in the postseason before.   They have hitting coaches who were hired because of their ability to promote a hitting philosophy and modern coaching techniques that the organization believes are optimal, but who have never coached major league players before in any capacity. Our core players are trying to figure out how to be major leaguers with far less guidance than people who have been there, than perhaps any group of young players ever.   They may be getting excellent instruction and swing analysis and data that will help them hit better, but they have no one who has been through the mental and physical and emotional  tribulations of being a young player in the majors and triumphed, to serve as an example as they try to grown into superstars and champions. In previous seasons, before "liftoff", we brought in guys like Frazier and Chirinos specifically to serve as veteran role modeals, and were able to do so because all the MLB pieces weren't in place yet and there were roster spots available.   Now those spots aren't available, and if we bring in someone for veteranosity they are also going to have to be good enough to play on a championship team.   Harder to find those guys of course.   But I wouldn't dismiss the need altogether.
    • It sounds like it was bad but perhaps not as bad as they thought it would be. 
    • Oh, I'd love to have one come through our system by being drafted and developed. No doubt at all. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...