Jump to content

How to do a quick rebuild.


bpilktree

Recommended Posts

The way the team is playing we will not stay in contention and the plan should be to look to ways to rebuild as best we can.    This is how I would rebuild this team with what are a few reasonable trades.

1.  Manny Machado to Houston for SS Alex Bergman, OF Derek Fisher, RHP Franklin Perez.

2.   Britton to Milwaukee for OfLewis Bronson SP Josh Hader or Luis Ortiiz.  

3. Brach to Nats for SP Fedde and  3B Neuse.

4.  Trade Castillo and anyone else that is not part or future you can.

5.  This offseason sign Jake McGee to fill in at back of pen.    Then Nunez to play at 3rd.  A veteran starter that doesn't cost pick and not cost a lot.  We have plenty of money in this scenario..  

Roster looks something like this

C Sisco

1B Davis

2nd Schoop

SS Bergman

3B Nunez

Lf Mancini

CF  Jones

RF Fisher

DH Trumbo

SP Bundy

SP Gausman

SP  Free agent

Sp Hader or Ortiz

SP  FEdde or Perez

RP Mcgee

Rp Givens

RP O,Day

RP Blier

Rp Wright

There is some other moves but this gets in idea what team could look like with a few moves,

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 34
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I'd add smith and miley to that list.

Smith to colorado for bullpen help and look to deal Miley for a mid tier prospect or maybe a feldman change of scenery type deal. 

I'd rather not see free agents leave for nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bpilktree said:

The way the team is playing we will not stay in contention and the plan should be to look to ways to rebuild as best we can.    This is how I would rebuild this team with what are a few reasonable trades.

1.  Manny Machado to Houston for SS Alex Bergman, OF Derek Fisher, RHP Franklin Perez.

2.   Britton to Milwaukee for OfLewis Bronson SP Josh Hader or Luis Ortiiz.  

3. Brach to Nats for SP Fedde and  3B Neuse.

4.  Trade Castillo and anyone else that is not part or future you can.

5.  This offseason sign Jake McGee to fill in at back of pen.    Then Nunez to play at 3rd.  A veteran starter that doesn't cost pick and not cost a lot.  We have plenty of money in this scenario..  

Roster looks something like this

C Sisco

1B Davis

2nd Schoop

SS Bergman

3B Nunez

Lf Mancini

CF  Jones

RF Fisher

DH Trumbo

SP Bundy

SP Gausman

SP  Free agent

Sp Hader or Ortiz

SP  FEdde or Perez

RP Mcgee

Rp Givens

RP O,Day

RP Blier

Rp Wright

There is some other moves but this gets in idea what team could look like with a few moves,

 

 

That and five years of top of the order drafts will put you back in the playoffs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty much spot on. Brach, Britton, Miley and Castillo should all be dumped. Machado - maybe, depending on how much of a discount his slow year will cost. Might be able to compete again next year, provided the return includes major-league ready talent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt Houston is giving up Bregman for Manny. They are already the best team in baseball without him. Houston built it the right way, they aren't going to burn their farm system for a year and a half of Machado when they are already a great team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Malike said:

I doubt Houston is giving up Bregman for Manny. They are already the best team in baseball without him. Houston built it the right way, they aren't going to burn their farm system for a year and a half of Machado when they are already a great team.

Sure they are. If they would want to have Manny. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Manny for Bergman is a tough deal to sell at the moment. Either Manny needs to catch fire, or the buying team needs to be desperate. It's possible to win in the trade market, but my opinion is the Houston will drive a hard bargain, ie they're not a great trade partner. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Malike said:

I doubt Houston is giving up Bregman for Manny. They are already the best team in baseball without him. Houston built it the right way, they aren't going to burn their farm system for a year and a half of Machado when they are already a great team.

Teams when they are close and even best teams make that trade that gets them that final piece.  The Cubs last year were clearly the best team in baseball and they traded one of best prospects in the game for 2 months of Chapman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, weams said:

Sure they are. If they would want to have Manny. 

Machado has been a half a win more valuable than Bregman. I doubt they do it.

 

Edit: he's been about 1 win better. ESPN was showing offense only which is half a win. I still doubt they'd trade the farm when they are already walking away from everyone else. I don't feel like they are desperate and think they are 1 player away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 99ct said:

Manny for Bergman is a tough deal to sell at the moment. Either Manny needs to catch fire, or the buying team needs to be desperate. It's possible to win in the trade market, but my opinion is the Houston will drive a hard bargain, ie they're not a great trade partner. 

Bergman is already loosing some at bats because of his struggles.  Gonzalez is forcing people in Houston to call to bench Bregman.  Manny is a big time player while Bregman is top prospect.  Manny is a much better glove at third  and more established player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fair point - I guess I didn't realize Bregman had fallen. It's also about what additional prospects would be included in the deal. But my overarching point was that Houston is unlikely to be desperate, and desperate trade partners are the best trade partners. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Malike said:

 ... they aren't going to burn their farm system for a year and a half of Machado when they are already a great team.

 It's two post season runs ('17 and '18), however, if they get Manny. That's what counts. Plus, if Manny's bat reverts to form, the second half of this year could be a torrid run by Manny leading into and possibly carrying over into the playoffs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, 99ct said:

Fair point - I guess I didn't realize Bregman had fallen. It's also about what additional prospects would be included in the deal. But my overarching point was that Houston is unlikely to be desperate, and desperate trade partners are the best trade partners. 

I think desperate teams overpay for mediocre upgrades.  Like we did with Parra though Davies wasn't a big prospect.  The best teams to trade for imo is teams with loaded farm systems and young players when you have a big piece.  The Astros have a great young team no doubt but also have a talented farm that could hurt them less with losing a couple good prospects more then a team with a weak farm.  You also never know how many chances you may get.  Everyone thought the Cubs were easily the best team in baseball this season and now they are struggling around .500 this year and major pitching issues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, 99ct said:

Fair point - I guess I didn't realize Bregman had fallen. It's also about what additional prospects would be included in the deal. But my overarching point was that Houston is unlikely to be desperate, and desperate trade partners are the best trade partners. 

How often are they going to be chasing their World Series?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Javy Baez has been on 5 playoff teams including a World Series winner and an LCS team.  128 postseason plate appearances. Mark Canha has been on 5 playoff teams and has 54 postseason plate appearances. Gio Urshela has been on 4 playoff teams and in an LCS and has 88 postseason plate appearances. Those 3 guys may not be big postseason contributors right now but that doesn't mean they aren't providing some amount of leadership by example.   They did have 1000 PAs among them this year for the Tigers.
    • Of course the question asked in that article doesn't really directly answer what a lot of people are talking about. No one is saying we want to have a roster full of guys with experience. But some have suggested that have a team almost completely devoid of guys who have had postseason success, might lead to a bunch of young players who lack role models and mentors and leaders who can help them the first time they face the pressure of the postseason, which really is a totally different animal than the 162 game regular season grind. Anecdotally, there are many guys from the 1966 Orioles (which was a pretty young team) who talked about how Frank came in and "taught us how to win". Anecdotally, back in the days of the "Oriole way", players talked about coming into the organization and learning from veterans how to conduct yourself and how to play the game the right way.   It's hard to have that when you have a total gutting/rebuild of a franchise.    Anecdotally, in the book Astroball, which I read quite a few years ago but I think I remember this part, they talked about the front office coming to the realization that they needed to bring in some veteran leadership, and specifically targeting Carlos Beltran for that reason. Maybe the anecdotes are BS.   Maybe guys just make up narratives after something is successful.   But these ARE human beings, not just a sequence of stats and numbers.   It makes sense that, especially with young players who have never dealt with failure much, the pressure of the postseason could become an isssue and it might be nice to have some wise old heads to lean on. We have a core of young players who have basically been eagerly awaited by fans, told that they are the basis of the next winning franchise, and greeted with adulation.   They came into a team that had minimal veteran leadership and no postseason experience.   They are managed by a manager who has been a coach on winning teams but has never managed in the postseason before.   They have hitting coaches who were hired because of their ability to promote a hitting philosophy and modern coaching techniques that the organization believes are optimal, but who have never coached major league players before in any capacity. Our core players are trying to figure out how to be major leaguers with far less guidance than people who have been there, than perhaps any group of young players ever.   They may be getting excellent instruction and swing analysis and data that will help them hit better, but they have no one who has been through the mental and physical and emotional  tribulations of being a young player in the majors and triumphed, to serve as an example as they try to grown into superstars and champions. In previous seasons, before "liftoff", we brought in guys like Frazier and Chirinos specifically to serve as veteran role modeals, and were able to do so because all the MLB pieces weren't in place yet and there were roster spots available.   Now those spots aren't available, and if we bring in someone for veteranosity they are also going to have to be good enough to play on a championship team.   Harder to find those guys of course.   But I wouldn't dismiss the need altogether.
    • It sounds like it was bad but perhaps not as bad as they thought it would be. 
    • Oh, I'd love to have one come through our system by being drafted and developed. No doubt at all. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...