Jump to content

Zac Lowther


glenn__davis

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, ChuckS said:

5 IP, 2 H, 0 R, 2 BB, 6 K's in his first start in Bowie. 

He's yet to be challenged in the minor leagues. Could be the first Bowie starter to make it to Baltimore, potentially sometime this year. 

He looked really good, the walks were on borderline pitches and the hits were very softly struck. I'd guess the average exit velocity off of him was in the 70s. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Luke-OH said:

He looked really good, the walks were on borderline pitches and the hits were very softly struck. I'd guess the average exit velocity off of him was in the 70s. 

Great.    There was a lot of speculation about whether his stuff would play in AA.    It’s only one start, but so far, so good.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Frobby said:

Great.    There was a lot of speculation about whether his stuff would play in AA.    It’s only one start, but so far, so good.   

Honestly it looked just like most of his A+ starts. Despite being high on Lowther, I've been realistic about concerns whether the FB will play at the higher levels. Proving it in AA would go a long way for me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Luke-OH said:

Honestly it looked just like most of his AA starts. Despite being high on Lowther, I've been realistic about concerns whether the FB will play at the higher levels. Proving it in AA would go a long way for me. 

I assume you mean it looked like most of his A/A+ starts.    Good news.  Let’s see if that continues.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I continue to root for Lowther (first syllable rhymes with 'cow', often mistakenly pronounced like opposite of 'high').  He's a perfect example of being able to have success without a blazing fastball.  I was able to talk to him on multiple occasions at Aberdeen when he was charting pitches on his offdays.  He's incredibly cerebral.  He knows what he wants to do on the mound, and it's very much a game of wits for him....which he usually wins.  Amazing makeup for his age. 

When he was drafted, I remember many folks saying he stuff won't play at the higher levels because fastball rarely registers above 90 MPH.  He  really maximizes the tools that he does have.  I couldn't be happier for him and I expect him to have continued success at Bowie and beyond.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Oldorioles said:

I continue to root for Lowther (first syllable rhymes with 'cow', often mistakenly pronounced like opposite of 'high').  He's a perfect example of being able to have success without a blazing fastball.  I was able to talk to him on multiple occasions at Aberdeen when he was charting pitches on his offdays.  He's incredibly cerebral.  He knows what he wants to do on the mound, and it's very much a game of wits for him....which he usually wins.  Amazing makeup for his age. 

When he was drafted, I remember many folks saying he stuff won't play at the higher levels because fastball rarely registers above 90 MPH.  He  really maximizes the tools that he does have.  I couldn't be happier for him and I expect him to have continued success at Bowie and beyond.  

90 for a LH isnt really that bad is it. Even RH can throw 90 if they have pinpoint command. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Pretty good outing for Lowther today: 5.1 IP, 1 H, 0 R, 3 BB, 6 K’s.    I’d prefer to see fewer walks and pitches per inning (89 in 5.1 tonight), but still a nice performance.    And the Baysox had a 4-0 win.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BTW, I haven't got a good read on his 2019 velocity yet, but he touched 94 last year, it's usually in the low 90s, he doesn't live in the 80s, maybe a 89 here and there. It's average LH SP velocity. He's not Wells, he's has at least a full grade on Wells on the FB and breaking ball. 

Edit: Looking at my notes was sitting 89-90 in April last year, but was where I initially stated after that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Legend_Of_Joey said:

Starting the "limit innings" thing early?

I would guess he's leaving the team for personal reasons/bereavement.  But maybe.  Not sure exactly why Lowther would be on a strict innings limit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Because it's an attempt to curb one team's fanbase from stuffing the ballot.
    • 1 vs 2 vote is stupid after #1 already got the most votes.  Why not 2 cs 3 for reserve?
    • Picking at 22 and 32 we have a chance to nab some guys with resumes. Benge, Brecht, Honeycutt, Amick, White, Culpepper, and one of the NCAA C if we want. Hopefully we can get two of those guys when we pick. Developing pitching and keeping it healthy is hard. With our recent history with bats it might be good to keep growing them. Benge and White/Amick would be ideal. They could be real close to Bowie this time next year. 
    • Hopefully, Santander is Tuck’s replacement. He is worthy, and his hard work should be rewarded if there is room.  Kimbrel would have been nice, but Clay Holmes, when rested and healthy, has much better stuff. I know the numbers are poor for him at the moment, but he is nasty. Kimbrel is a gutty vet who used to be incredibly tough. His selection this year would have been about his career and legacy. That is not a popular take on this board, so be it. Westburg and Mountcastle can use the time off. Both are supposed to be fairly banged up at the moment. O’Hearn is just another guy I would have loved to see make it. A grinder, who exemplifies the blue collar fan base of Baltimore. A great story, but mostly a platoon guy.
    • Outside of any of the "snubs" losing out of any potential bonuses, I don't care. I'd almost rather see them getting a solid break mid season anyways. 
    • I think there is a better term than "angry" to describe some of the O's. Anger seldom results in anything positive. Now, playing with attitude is another thing. GH is certainly the "King" of attitude on this team, no one is going to beat him. I believe there are several position players that show attitude in different ways. Pitchers?? SP throw 90 or so pitches. They can't afford to display emotions or they would be worn out much earlier. They also can't afford to have the "deer in the headlights" look. Of the O's starters, I believe CP is in that world at present. It's mainly an experience and growth thing.  GR, IMO, has approved significantly in that department over the last year. 
    • On close examination of Kjerstad today (July 7), I hope he is not part of any trade package. This kid is a bull, with power potential that is off the charts.  He runs surprisingly well and that throw to the plate from left was very impressive, if a bit high. I can see him planted in left field for a long time, perhaps in a platoon with Hays the rest of the year, but eventually full time if he proves able to hit southpaws.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...