Jump to content

Manny


brooksfrankjim

Recommended Posts

I think Manny has a few things going on:

1) He's bulked up a lot and is obviously trying to his a lot of HRs, to the detriment of his BA and OBP.

2) I think he's looking ahead to being traded and then being a FA.  I think it's obvious to anyone realistic that he's not going to be an Oriole on his next contract.  The only question is do they trade him or ride it out and just let him leave as a FA.  If they trade him, do they do it now, this offseason, or next July.  I think this is all weighing on Manny right now, as he has shown that he can lack maturity at times.  Hey, he's 24, I think we all probably lacked maturity at that age at times.  But point is, I think he's suffering from a lack of focus at times due to his pending future.

Combine #1 and #2, and you see why his performance has been off this year.  And no, IMO, I don't think that will hurt his value much, if at all.  Teams know what they're getting if they trade for/sign him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 117
  • Created
  • Last Reply
18 minutes ago, esmd said:

I think Manny has a few things going on:

1) He's bulked up a lot and is obviously trying to his a lot of HRs, to the detriment of his BA and OBP.

2) I think he's looking ahead to being traded and then being a FA.  I think it's obvious to anyone realistic that he's not going to be an Oriole on his next contract.  The only question is do they trade him or ride it out and just let him leave as a FA.  If they trade him, do they do it now, this offseason, or next July.  I think this is all weighing on Manny right now, as he has shown that he can lack maturity at times.  Hey, he's 24, I think we all probably lacked maturity at that age at times.  But point is, I think he's suffering from a lack of focus at times due to his pending future.

Combine #1 and #2, and you see why his performance has been off this year.  And no, IMO, I don't think that will hurt his value much, if at all.  Teams know what they're getting if they trade for/sign him.

Nice list of excuses.... perhaps he's not as good as the average OH poster thinks he is.

No more 400 million dollar contract talk... would anyone give him 5/100 today?

There are 19 starting 3B with a better OPS than Manny, not really that many folks going to be interested

leaves the door open for the O's to bid against themselves... Imagine Manny at 3B and Chris Davis at 1B for the next 5 years and neither hitting above .250

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, webbrick2010 said:

Nice list of excuses.... perhaps he's not as good as the average OH poster thinks he is.

No more 400 million dollar contract talk... would anyone give him 5/100 today?

There are 19 starting 3B with a better OPS than Manny, not really that many folks going to be interested

leaves the door open for the O's to bid against themselves... Imagine Manny at 3B and Chris Davis at 1B for the next 5 years and neither hitting above .250

Manny will still easily get well over $200+ million in the open market. Jason Heyward got a $184 million contract, Ellsbury got $153 million and Carl Crawford got $142 million and none of those guys can hold Manny's jock as a player. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

Well, that does it.  Wraps it all up.  Shows over, folks.  Book has been written about Manny Machado.  One bad season and he can never get better.  

Hey, I know.  A better comp would have been  like talking about Cal Ripken in 1990.  THERE.  I bet if the OH existed in 1990 there'd be a bunch of Dundalkers with mullets and tank tops talking about how we can't have a SS hitting .240 and that the team isn't as good as it was in 1989 because of him.  

 

    I am from Highlandtown and I recall having a discussion with my late Uncle how Ripken looked soft and out of shape    during that season. It  would have have been a good idea for him to sit.   Further, I think Murray should have been MVP over Ripken in 1982. Manny is having a bad year thus far and I think that the fans have been pretty patient with his overall approach. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, webbrick2010 said:

Nice list of excuses.... perhaps he's not as good as the average OH poster thinks he is.

No more 400 million dollar contract talk... would anyone give him 5/100 today?

There are 19 starting 3B with a better OPS than Manny, not really that many folks going to be interested

leaves the door open for the O's to bid against themselves... Imagine Manny at 3B and Chris Davis at 1B for the next 5 years and neither hitting above .250

Most GM's are not shortsighted, and are going to look at Manny's entire career to date, not one particular half-season in which he's struggled.     I always thought the $400 mm talk was silly, even assuming Manny kept posting seasons like he had in 2015-16.     But $300 mm is surely still in play. I'd sign him for 10/$300 mm without thinking twice about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Most GM's are not shortsighted, and are going to look at Manny's entire career to date, not one particular half-season in which he's struggled.     I always thought the $400 mm talk was silly, even assuming Manny kept posting seasons like he had in 2015-16.     But $300 mm is surely still in play. I'd sign him for 10/$300 mm without thinking twice about it.

Wow, without thinking about it?

How many 10/200 million dollar deals can you list that benefitted the team (on field record, not attendance).

I've said it before whatever Manny gets will be a mistake by the signing team.

You'd think his complete lack of hustle would be enough of a red flag to at lest thinking twice about signing a 10 year deal, than there is the .215 batting average, the surgically repaired knees, the negative baserunning value.

It'll be real interesting following Manny over the next 5-10 years

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, El Gordo said:

It is at times he is still making terrific plays. He just isn't thinking in his AB. Don't know why.

There's still a ~.070 separation between his batting average and on base percentage.  

I don't want to come off as a Manny apologist but guys have bad years.  It happens.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

There's still a ~.070 separation between his batting average and on base percentage.  

I don't want to come off as a Manny apologist but guys have bad years.  It happens.  

That's what I say.     That said, every time Manny puts together a little hot streak this year, he goes cold again.     I keep waiting for a sustained hot streak.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Superbee83 said:

    That's one of my issues with signing Machado to a long term deal if the team is rebuilding. 

     He certainly has not handled the adversity very well this season.

     

He handled being thrown at perfectly. Let's get him on dr Phil.

This should fe simple, have a number you're willing to pay and trade him if it's not good enough. I think he will be one of the top 10 players in baseball for 8 years, but if he's unwilling to accept an offer now, get the best offer out there and build on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Cowser had a 4.0 fWAR in 2024. You ready to lock him up for 7-8 years or longer?
    • I think he already had and it was Bradish.  Midling prospect who turns out to have #1 level stuff.  Injuries are a bitch.
    • Cell service restored, power back on, not a single shingle missing from the roof. 
    • They need players who are better than some they have
    • Probably neither - it may be more a function of lining up with players.  The Astros extensions aren’t really comparable. The first Altuve extension was ridiculously team friendly. Altuve had less than $1MM in career earnings ($15K signing bonus as amateur). He had a good 2012, making the all-star team. However, he struggled in the first half of 2013 with an OPS in the six hundreds.  He fired Boras in May, presumably because he wanted to sign an extension that Boras would have been vehemently opposed to.  The deal announced in July bought out his four remaining years of team control for $12.5MM and gave the Astros control over what would have been his first two FA years via club options that totaled $25MM. The second Altuve extension occurred after he rehired Boras and was basically about buying out his grossly undervalued club option years.  It was needed to reverse the mistake of the first extension. The Bregman extension was reached in ARB-3 negotiations. Neither of these situations are at all comparable to a potential Gunnar extension this offseason. First of all, Boras had NEVER extended a pre-arb player with seven figures in career earnings (Carlos Gonzalez was below that threshold).  He is philosophically opposed to it. Second, there are two potential comps that would starting points for a deal: Tatis Jr and Witt Jr.  Boras would reject either of those deals; he would want to do better given his distaste for pre-arb extensions, his strong preference for “record-breaking” deals, and the fact the Gunnar has more career WAR (at least fWAR) than either of those players when they signed their extensions.  When teams are successful in getting a lot of early extensions done, it’s often a case of having a lot of players amenable to an extension. That generally covers attributes such as not signing a large draft or IFA bonus (i.e., relatively “poor” players), players with geographic ties to the team (big part of Atlanta’s success), not having Boras as their agent, and being more risk-adverse from a financial perspective.  The team’s risk tolerance also plays a role as you can get burned if they turn into Grady Sizemore.
    • I think the main reason they’re not big contributors for the Tigers right now is that they were all jettisoned from the team right around the time the Tigers got good. Canha was traded to SFG at the deadline, Urshela was DFA’d on August 15, and Baez shuffled off to season-ending hip surgery on August 22. They were 62-66 when Baez was shut down — they’re 28-11 since.
    • Their rebuild has not been better but their players don't melt under pressure.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...