Jump to content

Astros Should Give Orioles What They Want for Britton


section18

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 114
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I’ve been thinking a bit about why I don’t like FIP.     In part, I think it’s because FIP doesn’t consider consistency.     Let’s say you have a pitcher who strikes out 2 batters an inning 4 times out of 5, but about once every 5 times has serious command issues gets in trouble and is quite prone to allowing runs, sometimes multiple runs.     Then you have a second guy who strikes out a little more than a batter per inning, gets a ton of ground balls and only has a rough appearance once every 10 times.    FIP is going to like the first  pitcher better, because FIP loves K’s, but I’d prefer the second pitcher.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Roll Tide said:

We will have to agree to disagree .... where are the Orange colored glasses?

2016 2-1  0.54 era 47/47 saves in 69 innings.

Chapman best era 1.54 (2012) , saves 38 (2012 & 2013)

Since Zach became the closer in 2014 he's lost 5 games. In the same period Chapman has lost 12.

have to admit ...Chapman does have more Ks...but that's about it

 

Not really an argument. It's facts versus speculation. Chapman, Jensen, and Miller all stayed relatively healthy and had great seasons this year. Britton did not. Citing prior seasons  seems irrelevant to me when you're original comment was based on what you think Britton "would've" done if he had stayed healthy this year. 

If he was healthy he "might" have had a better season than Chapman, but not the other two. Look at their numbers. They were incredible. 

Jensen's 2017 Stats - 1.32 era, .746 whip, 109 Ks (in 68.1 IP), 41 saves

Chapman's 2017 Stats - 3.22 era, 1.13 whip, 69 Ks (in 50.1 IP), 22 saves (1 save)

MIller's 2017 Stats - 1.44 era, ..83 whip, 95 Ks (in 62.2 IP), 2 Saves (27 Holds)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, wildbillhiccup said:

Not really an argument. It's facts versus speculation. Chapman, Jensen, and Miller all stayed relatively healthy and had great seasons this year. Britton did not. Citing prior seasons  seems irrelevant to me when you're original comment was based on what you think Britton "would've" done if he had stayed healthy this year. 

If he was healthy he "might" have had a better season than Chapman, but not the other two. Look at their numbers. They were incredible. 

Jensen's 2017 Stats - 1.32 era, .746 whip, 109 Ks (in 68.1 IP), 41 saves

Chapman's 2017 Stats - 3.22 era, 1.13 whip, 69 Ks (in 50.1 IP), 22 saves (1 save)

MIller's 2017 Stats - 1.44 era, ..83 whip, 95 Ks (in 62.2 IP), 2 Saves (27 Holds)

Speculation? Seriously dude.... Britton has 120 saves over the previous three years with an ERA of 1.4 ish.

He was injured this season ...but he's 29 and in his prime for a baseball player.

Jansen is actually a comp the last two seasons. As far as Miller he's a Lefty specialist and doesn't have the saves. And Chapmans saves are not in the ballpark and he is a closer. 

If you look at the last four years I'll bet Britton has the best numbers.

but sure ,..... if you want to look at just 2017 then you can validate your argument. The Orioles wouldnt/won't deal Britton on his 2017 numbers. I think we can agree on that much. Besides none of the guys you mentioned were on the market or dealt in 2017. The two years ago when Chapman and Miller were Zach was the better pitcher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Roll Tide said:

Speculation? Seriously dude.... Britton has 120 saves over the previous three years with an ERA of 1.4 ish.

He was injured this season ...but he's 29 and in his prime for a baseball player.

Jansen is actually a comp the last two seasons. As far as Miller he's a Lefty specialist and doesn't have the saves. And Chapmans saves are not in the ballpark and he is a closer. 

If you look at the last four years I'll bet Britton has the best numbers.

but sure ,..... if you want to look at just 2017 then you can validate your argument. The Orioles wouldnt/won't deal Britton on his 2017 numbers. I think we can agree on that much. Besides none of the guys you mentioned were on the market or dealt in 2017. The two years ago when Chapman and Miller were Zach was the better pitcher.

Saves?

Lefty specialist?

LHB hit for a 481 OPS this year.

RHB hit for a 424 OPS this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

Speculation? Seriously dude.... Britton has 120 saves over the previous three years with an ERA of 1.4 ish.

He was injured this season ...but he's 29 and in his prime for a baseball player.

Jansen is actually a comp the last two seasons. As far as Miller he's a Lefty specialist and doesn't have the saves. And Chapmans saves are not in the ballpark and he is a closer. 

If you look at the last four years I'll bet Britton has the best numbers.

but sure ,..... if you want to look at just 2017 then you can validate your argument. The Orioles wouldnt/won't deal Britton on his 2017 numbers. I think we can agree on that much. Besides none of the guys you mentioned were on the market or dealt in 2017. The two years ago when Chapman and Miller were Zach was the better pitcher.

We’re in 2017 now.  No one cares about saves. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Frobby said:

I’ve been thinking a bit about why I don’t like FIP.     In part, I think it’s because FIP doesn’t consider consistency.     Let’s say you have a pitcher who strikes out 2 batters an inning 4 times out of 5, but about once every 5 times has serious command issues gets in trouble and is quite prone to allowing runs, sometimes multiple runs.     Then you have a second guy who strikes out a little more than a batter per inning, gets a ton of ground balls and only has a rough appearance once every 10 times.    FIP is going to like the first  pitcher better, because FIP loves K’s, but I’d prefer the second pitcher.  

FIP only looks at Ks, BBs, and HR.  The pitchers who are underrated by FIP are generally guys who generate a lot of weak contact in the air such as IFFB.  Also being good from the stretch will cause one to be underrated, since FIP doesn’t care about sequencing.  Overrated players are ones who give up a lot of line drives and hard contact.  Also pitchers that struggle from the stretch/under pressure will be overrated since FIP doesn’t care about sequencing.

FIP is just a tool, you don’t need to like it or dislike it.  It’s helpful as it removes things like result sequencing and whether a batted ball in play is turned into an out or two outs or a hit (single, double, triple). Those things are troublesome in evaluating a pitcher because they are subject to so much random variation and can be affected severely by the quality of the fielding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

That's not my point. We were comparing resumes. Brach has also been one of the better set up men. When he was asked to close everyday the numbers weren't as good.

True, I said this many times in the past, when people want closer by committee or feel any decent reliever can be the closer.

It take a unique mindset to close games, day in and day out, under intense pressure to perform.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

That's not my point. We were comparing resumes. Brach has also been one of the better set up men. When he was asked to close everyday the numbers weren't as good.

10.48 K/9    2.85 BB/9   0.80 HR/9   2.05 ERA     2.92 FIP   3.31 XFIP   2.99 SIERA   1.04 WHIP - Brad Brach's best season 2014-2017

14.59 K/9    2.92 BB/9   0.73 HR/9   2.04 ERA     2.16 FIP   2.06 XFIP   1.72 SIERA   0.86 WHIP  - Andrew Miller's worst season 2014-2017

14.89 K/9    1.09 BB/9   0.97 HR/9   1.45 ERA     1.68 FIP   1.18 XFIP   1.10 SIERA   0.69 WHIP  - Andrew Miller's best season 2014-2017

9.26 K/9    3.44 BB/9   0.93 HR/9   3.18 ERA     3.58 FIP   4.05 XFIP     3.77 SIERA    1.13 WHIP - Brad Brach's worst season 2015-2017 (excluding 2015 so you can't say he wasn't good yet)

Prime Andrew Miller at his worst is better than prime Brad Brach at his best.  Miller's average performance is clearly on another level from Brach.  It's pretty obvious watching them pitch as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, phillyOs119 said:

10.48 K/9    2.85 BB/9   0.80 HR/9   2.05 ERA     2.92 FIP   3.31 XFIP   2.99 SIERA   1.04 WHIP - Brad Brach's best season 2014-2017

14.59 K/9    2.92 BB/9   0.73 HR/9   2.04 ERA     2.16 FIP   2.06 XFIP   1.72 SIERA   0.86 WHIP  - Andrew Miller's worst season 2014-2017

14.89 K/9    1.09 BB/9   0.97 HR/9   1.45 ERA     1.68 FIP   1.18 XFIP   1.10 SIERA   0.69 WHIP  - Andrew Miller's best season 2014-2017

9.26 K/9    3.44 BB/9   0.93 HR/9   3.18 ERA     3.58 FIP   4.05 XFIP     3.77 SIERA    1.13 WHIP - Brad Brach's worst season 2015-2017 (excluding 2015 so you can't say he wasn't good yet)

Prime Andrew Miller at his worst is better than prime Brad Brach at his best.  Miller's average performance is clearly on another level from Brach.  It's pretty obvious watching them pitch as well. 

But saves.

AAEAAQAAAAAAAAb1AAAAJDUyZGY4MWM3LWE5OWUt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ArtVanDelay said:

But saves.

AAEAAQAAAAAAAAb1AAAAJDUyZGY4MWM3LWE5OWUt

I can guaranteed you, the next time, an Oriole reliever blows a save.

You better believe OH will be lite up, with people talking about it. :)

IMO, and I guess I am an old school guy, but I still like the save, because at the end of the day, those 45-55 saves, meant your team went home victorious and celebrating from a close game that could have gone the other way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • No one is trading anything close to that for Crochet. But I agree..spend money, not prospects.
    • That's some high standards.  Sinker ball types are always going to have higher FIPs and lower K rates.  The truth is, Quintana is probably out of our price range.  That price range is probably no more than the standard Lyles/Gibson/Kimbrel/Frazier price range until otherwise seen.   Back to Quintana, I think he's the type of guy that if healthy could be a real weapon for us with our home ballpark and a home playoff game if we ever get deep into a series.  
    • That's really the role/opening for next year that we need.  A RHH OF that could play some CF preferably.  Although, I'd lean more to and offensive minded portion of that versus the ability to play CF.  LF is big though at home. I think it's a role that Elias fills through trade, waivers, or maybe even a competition of milb deal types.  Like a RH Sam Hilliard type.  
    • Yeah, he would be good in the Austin Slater role if he was willing to accept it. Not sure that he would be quite as good defensively in CF, given that he has played fewer than 100 innings total in CF since 2021. I highly doubt that he is ready to accept a role as a platoon player though, given that he is not yet 30, and he was an above average starter by rWAR from 2021-23. I doubt he is tendered a contract, given his $6M 2024 salary. His best bet is probably to sign a one year deal with a team that doesn't hope to compete, to attempt to reestablish himself as an everyday player, while the team that signs him can hope to flip him at the trade deadline.
    • I agree. He’d be a great regular season fit in Cinncy’s ballpark. Maybe that confidence of knowing he can hit the ball out to LF at home covers up his other decencies.  As for Crochet… can’t we just resign Burnes?  Crochet would probably cost Holliday, Basallo, and Mayo. Didn’t the deadline teach us the cost of pitching? I’m for trading Mountcastle. I’d hope we can surround the young hitters with a Burnes led staff with adding a vet bat to the DH/1B mix. Other than that, I think we will roll with what we have. And we should. 
    • Hays will want to start somewhere. He shouldn't start for us. We don't want him sitting on the bench looking dejected while Kjerstad and Cowser are mashing bombs onto Eutaw Street.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...