Jump to content

Describe what you think the O's should be looking for in starters


wildcard

Recommended Posts

O's need three.   Here is what I think the O's should be looking to acquire. 

1) Inning eaters

2) Able to put up a .500 record

3) Short terms

I think the O's should look for Bundy and Gausman to be the starters that lead the team to the playoffs.   Each should win 5 more games than they lose and pitch 200 innings.  If they can do that then the other 3 just have to be .500 pitchers who eat innings.  I am happy with short term deals because the O's need to develop Harvey and Akin.   Both should be in the majors in a  year.

I don't want 3 expensive starters.   That money should go to Gausman and Bundy going forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I don't know what the drop rate is on pitchers, but it's hard to count on both of them in the future. I remember the "cavalry" days and folks were counting on them a bit much.

As far as pitches for next season...young and cost controlled. I think anything on the FA market will give us more of what we had this year. Maybe Chatwood if he is not overpriced. Other than that, Dan will have to get creative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

 

If they don't want to trade Machado and Schoop then they're just going to have to get lucky with their FA pitcher acquistions.  I'd certainly look to innings-eaters who have a track record of 5-6 IP with 3-4 runs allowed on short term deals and just hope to get a career year out of them. Maybe bring back Tillman on a minor-league deal and hope he can make a comeback. Other than that, I don't know what else they can do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Consistently average or better over the last few years...let's not make the Ubaldo mistake again "Hey, this guy has been rather awful for a little while but had a nice 2nd half leading into free agency". Someone who can eat innings and keep the ball in the park. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, wildcard said:

O's need three.   Here is what I think the O's should be looking to acquire. 

1) Inning eaters

2) Able to put up a .500 record

3) Short terms

I think the O's should look for Bundy and Gausman to be the starters that lead the team to the playoffs.   Each should win 5 more games than they lose and pitch 200 innings.  If they can do that then the other 3 just have to be .500 pitchers who eat innings.  I am happy with short term deals because the O's need to develop Harvey and Akin.   Both should be in the majors in a  year.

I don't want 3 expensive starters.   That money should go to Gausman and Bundy going forward.

I'm not sure how you can assess how many wins and losses a pitcher is going to get.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with the original post.

 

As I've said already, I like the combo of Chatwood and Vargas. 

I think we need a lefty in the rotation. It helps in the AL East. Plus we might be able to get him on a one year deal. I also think he's better than some people are giving him credit for. At least better than Miley.

Chatwood, assuming he passes the Os physical after two TJ surgeries, would be a relatively affordable piece that could help us now and in the future. He's 27. He keeps the ball on the ground and has had an ERA+ of 125 and 107 over the past two years. I could see him being a decent #3-4 starter for a couple years while we wait for the youngins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SP with 50+% QS rate. W/L not important. With a strong pen 65- 70 QS translates to 85-90 W. Cashner career QS% 58, Gonzo 57, Lynn 60,  Cobb 57, Chacin  49, Dickey 60,  Garcia 53, Lackey 60, Chatwood  40, Vargas 54. IMO a high QS rate coupled with a high GB rate is the kin d of SP we need.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TommyPickles said:

I agree with the original post.

 

As I've said already, I like the combo of Chatwood and Vargas. 

I think we need a lefty in the rotation. It helps in the AL East. Plus we might be able to get him on a one year deal. I also think he's better than some people are giving him credit for. At least better than Miley.

Chatwood, assuming he passes the Os physical after two TJ surgeries, would be a relatively affordable piece that could help us now and in the future. He's 27. He keeps the ball on the ground and has had an ERA+ of 125 and 107 over the past two years. I could see him being a decent #3-4 starter for a couple years while we wait for the youngins.

What do you like about Chatwood? 4+ BB/9. I would like the Orioles for once to not have the guy who leads the league in walks but he would be a very good candidate to do so. 

I would be slightly more enthusiastic about Vargas but only slightly. He was pretty much shredded on the Vargas/Cashner thread. 6.0 K/9, I would not be enthusiastic about him pitching in Camden Yards against Judge etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, wildcard said:

O's need three.   Here is what I think the O's should be looking to acquire. 

1) Inning eaters

2) Able to put up a .500 record

3) Short terms

I think the O's should look for Bundy and Gausman to be the starters that lead the team to the playoffs.   Each should win 5 more games than they lose and pitch 200 innings.  If they can do that then the other 3 just have to be .500 pitchers who eat innings.  I am happy with short term deals because the O's need to develop Harvey and Akin.   Both should be in the majors in a  year.

I don't want 3 expensive starters.   That money should go to Gausman and Bundy going forward.

Whatever they can get at dumpster rates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You need someone (or more than one) to fit into each of the following buckets:

1. Top of the rotation arm. We aren't going to get a true No. 1 starter. Arrieta and Darvish are the only ones out there you can qualify in that category and neither are options. The next step down, however, has some options. To me, the answer is Cobb. You need someone that can give you a mid-3 ERA in 170+ innings of work. That's exactly what Cobb did last year and he's shown the ability to do better than that. Durability has been an issue, but he's still the best bet in my estimation.

2. Mid rotation arm. Here we have plenty of options. You need someone who can pitch in the 3 or 4 spot depending on where you place Gausman and Bundy. Tyler Chatwood and Jaime Garcia would be my main targets.

3. You need a few depth guys. These guys would, ideally, be minor league signings or maybe a low dollar, one year deal. It's someone to compete with Miguel Castro and the other internal SP options for the fifth spot and/or wind up in the pen as a long reliever. This group also includes someone(s) to start in Triple-A to give the team options in case of injury. Maybe Tillman falls in this category on an incentive laden one-year deal?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • He'll go back to pulling pitches and hit 30 HRs there.
    • I tend to agree with this.  We certainly aren't the best farm system any more and it's time to use Uncle Dave's money some.  I'm in favor of buying the pitching we need.  There are some good FA arms out there.  If there's a bat on another team they want to trade for that's different since the FA position player list isn't good.
    • This what I think happens too.  We'll trade from the FV 40ish tier not the 45 or higher tier.  And I can see dealing from the top ofthe deck (i.e. Mounty, Urias, Kremer*...) to build the ceiling of the pipeljne or weaker/thinner positions.  *A Kremer based deal would be predicated on an FA SP signing.  I don't see it happening but it's an interesting case study.
    • Maybe he should be a free agent target this offseason. 
    • Hays hit .354 / .404 / .537 against LH pitching this season. I would absolutely take him back as a platoon player who can fill in all three OF positions. Given the number of southpaws other teams throw against us we'd be nuts not to consider signing him if he gets DFA'd. 
    • I went and checked how we compared to other playoff teams in platooning and pinch-hitting during the playoffs.  I used the first two wildcard games as the sample to keep it apples to apples with the Orioles’ experience.  For the 8 wildcard teams, I counted the number of line-up changes from game 1 to game 2 and the number of pinch hit PAs and added them together.  For lineup changes, I didn’t consider batting order or positions, only the number of hitters that started game 1 but didn’t start game 2 (only McCann for the Orioles). The Orioles were middle of the pack - 4th highest moves among the 8 wildcard teams. #       Team                Lineup changes Pinch hits PAs Total        T1 Tigers 3 5 8            T1 Astros 1 7 8 3 Mets 1 6 7 4 Orioles 1 5 6 5 Royals 1 4 5 6 Braves 1 2 3 7 Brewers 1 1 2 8 Padres 0 0 0 For some additional context, only the Orioles and Tigers faced different-handed starters the first two games AND had opposing pitcher handedness change at least 5 times in those games. Teams that faced same-hand starter both days: Royals Astros Mets Braves   Number times opposing pitcher handedness changed in game: Astros - 8 Royals - 8 Orioles - 5 Tigers - 5 Mets - 4 Padres - 3 Braves - 2 Brewers - 1 
    • If Hays is non tendered he will be looking for the team that will play him full time.     And he might find it.   He in not even 30 yet.   But the O's don't have that to offer him.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...