Jump to content

The 2016 rotation


Frobby

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Bundy, Gausman, M.Harvey, Vargas, Fiers.  

AAA- Ynoa, Asher

Wildcard- Hunter Harvey

With a healthy Britton you can win with that rotation. 

I'd consider the off season a failure unless Brittion, Brach, and Machado were no longer on the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

8 hours ago, wildcard said:

That is probably a last place team.

 

4 hours ago, El Gordo said:

If I had my druthers it would be, Bundy, Gausman, Cobb, Lynn, CC..

 

1 hour ago, Roll Tide said:

I'd consider the off season a failure unless Brittion, Brach, and Machado were no longer on the team.

You guys are setting yourselves up for big let downs this offseason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My guess is the O's offer Chatwood 4 years.  Maybe not initially but that is where they are prepared to go.

Vargas - 2/24,  I don't know if that is enough  but that is where I guess they are.

Tillman - The O's will offer a low base but  more incentives than anyone else.

Dan, thinks he can trade Trumbo for pitching.  I don't know if that works but Dan is trying.

O's will be in on Cashner.

Not all of that works but maybe some will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, wildcard said:

My guess is the O's offer Chatwood 4 years.  Maybe not initially but that is where they are prepared to go.

Vargas - 2/24,  I don't know if that is enough  but that is where I guess they are.

Tillman - The O's will offer a low base but  more incentives than anyone else.

Dan, thinks he can trade Trumbo for pitching.  I don't know if that works but Dan is trying.

O's will be in on Cashner.

Not all of that works but maybe some will.

I hope he can trade Trumbo for pitching. I don't think it will be a very useful pitcher, but it would mean Trumbo is gone so I'd be happy.

I'd be fine with signing Vargas and Chatwood but I still don't think it will be enough to make us a playoff team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Black Bat said:

You really are pushing hard for a rebuild.  I'm with you.  Enough Band-Aid solutions.  In fact, rip it off.  I don't understand the support for the status quo where we keep rotating mediocre players while giving up farm prospects to somehow stay relevant for that particular year thereby mortgaging the future. 

A rebuild will allow for more sustained future winning through more young talent acquisition.  It seems that many here are impatient and can't appreciate nor fathom the sacrifice that is required to move forward.  It's the only way to compete with those big money markets within the division.  Mediocre, bought talent will not beat all-stars despite the bullpen strength.  You need to inexpensively grow your own quality players and when you do so, like Houston or the Cubs, then add a few veterans to the mix to defeat the big guys, if necessary.  

I love the O's approach thus far to develop a strong bullpen to offset the disparity among SP talent.  But they have a chance to develop that SP staff now.  And they have lost their way of retaining that other ingredient: strong defense.  And they need better situational hitting, less swinging for the fences and less strikeouts as this approach can only take you so far...such as first round playoff exits.  They can build something much better than that but it needs a new approach.  

If you are going for it prove it by signing Cobb, one of Chatwood/Vargas/ the Rangers pitcher, and a 5th starter that can give 150 innings of 4-4.5 era ball. 

If your not serious than rebuild.

to all those who are saying I’m building up for a big letdown... I’m not... we have one of the worst owners in professional sports and a GM who is another blundering idiot if he believes the fans wouldn’t be happy with a rebuild. If your plan is to let our best players leave at the end of this coming season you are not good for the health of the franchise or the fans.

i believe most fans are pretty smart and can see right through the half measures that at best make us pretenders!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Black Bat said:

I hear you but actually think it's better than the depressive, down-on-their-luck approach alternative.  Spring hopes eternal.  If you can't find optimism in life, you are lost.  Maybe they don't get their Santa's list filled but maybe guys the O's get will outperform expectations.  

Trading for Matt Harvey was my optimistic hopeful move. Lol. The Red Sox just waived Henry Owens https://www.baseball-reference.com/register/player.fcgi?id=owens-002hen.  He’s worth a look. 25. LH. 367 IP in AAA, 3.53 ERA. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Trading for Matt Harvey was my optimistic hopeful move. Lol. The Red Sox just waived Henry Owens https://www.baseball-reference.com/register/player.fcgi?id=owens-002hen.  He’s worth a look. 25. LH. 367 IP in AAA, 3.53 ERA. 

I think he’s worth a look, too, but he wasn’t very good last year. I don’t think signing with the Orioles gets him back to his career numbers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/6/2017 at 9:58 AM, Black Bat said:

You really are pushing hard for a rebuild.  I'm with you.  Enough Band-Aid solutions.  In fact, rip it off.  I don't understand the support for the status quo where we keep rotating mediocre players while giving up farm prospects to somehow stay relevant for that particular year thereby mortgaging the future. 

A rebuild will allow for more sustained future winning through more young talent acquisition.  It seems that many here are impatient and can't appreciate nor fathom the sacrifice that is required to move forward.  It's the only way to compete with those big money markets within the division.  Mediocre, bought talent will not beat all-stars despite the bullpen strength.  You need to inexpensively grow your own quality players and when you do so, like Houston or the Cubs, then add a few veterans to the mix to defeat the big guys, if necessary.  

I love the O's approach thus far to develop a strong bullpen to offset the disparity among SP talent.  But they have a chance to develop that SP staff now.  And they have lost their way of retaining that other ingredient: strong defense.  And they need better situational hitting, less swinging for the fences and less strikeouts as this approach can only take you so far...such as first round playoff exits.  They can build something much better than that but it needs a new approach.  

That is funny to read on an Orioles fan message board. Oriole fans don't know what it is like to sacrifice.....we are so spoiled with our years of easy winning, can't even remember what it is like NOT to go to the WS every year.

Rebuilds are fine, but are very far from a guarantee. Odds are your rebuild will result in a mediocre team 4 years from now, no better than the one we currently have assembled. Bottom line - We need much better starting pitching....if we can get that for 2018, we can make the post season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • No one is trading anything close to that for Crochet. But I agree..spend money, not prospects.
    • That's some high standards.  Sinker ball types are always going to have higher FIPs and lower K rates.  The truth is, Quintana is probably out of our price range.  That price range is probably no more than the standard Lyles/Gibson/Kimbrel/Frazier price range until otherwise seen.   Back to Quintana, I think he's the type of guy that if healthy could be a real weapon for us with our home ballpark and a home playoff game if we ever get deep into a series.  
    • That's really the role/opening for next year that we need.  A RHH OF that could play some CF preferably.  Although, I'd lean more to and offensive minded portion of that versus the ability to play CF.  LF is big though at home. I think it's a role that Elias fills through trade, waivers, or maybe even a competition of milb deal types.  Like a RH Sam Hilliard type.  
    • Yeah, he would be good in the Austin Slater role if he was willing to accept it. Not sure that he would be quite as good defensively in CF, given that he has played fewer than 100 innings total in CF since 2021. I highly doubt that he is ready to accept a role as a platoon player though, given that he is not yet 30, and he was an above average starter by rWAR from 2021-23. I doubt he is tendered a contract, given his $6M 2024 salary. His best bet is probably to sign a one year deal with a team that doesn't hope to compete, to attempt to reestablish himself as an everyday player, while the team that signs him can hope to flip him at the trade deadline.
    • I agree. He’d be a great regular season fit in Cinncy’s ballpark. Maybe that confidence of knowing he can hit the ball out to LF at home covers up his other decencies.  As for Crochet… can’t we just resign Burnes?  Crochet would probably cost Holliday, Basallo, and Mayo. Didn’t the deadline teach us the cost of pitching? I’m for trading Mountcastle. I’d hope we can surround the young hitters with a Burnes led staff with adding a vet bat to the DH/1B mix. Other than that, I think we will roll with what we have. And we should. 
    • Hays will want to start somewhere. He shouldn't start for us. We don't want him sitting on the bench looking dejected while Kjerstad and Cowser are mashing bombs onto Eutaw Street.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...