Jump to content

Good Week for A Sale?


mdbdotcom

Recommended Posts

The Winter Meetings are here, and the O's are already out of contention. It's hard to see how adding any combination of available starting pitchers (other than maybe both Darvish and Cobb) makes this team a contender.  So, maybe it's time for the owners to make 2018 a transition year.

Starting at the Winter Meetings, let's sell a bunch of players who are 30+ and/or won't be with the team when we next compete for the best prospects we can get. Here's my For Sale list:

  • Richard Bleier
  • Brad Brach
  • Zach Britton
  • Darren O’Day
  • Manny Machado
  • Adam Jones
  • Mark Trumbo

Will they find buyers for all those players? Probably not. I didn't include Caleb Joseph because it will probably make the season a little more bearable to have a veteran catcher on hand. He can also serve as a mentor to Sisco/Wynns. And I didn't include Chris Davis because he is worth less than dirt. I left Schoop out for the slim chance that we could extend him.

Ideally we would already have in place the GM who will oversee the rebuild, but that isn't the case. So Duquette's task will have to be clear. Sell for the best prospects you can get.

Then we'll have a whole season to find a new GM who will oversee the rebuild and hire a manager he/she can work with who understands that we are in the 21st century. Once we dump some of those contracts, maybe we can also bring enough modern-thinking baseball people into the front office to have it function more like the really good teams do. We seem to be out-manned in every area from development to advanced scouting to turning analytics into action. Getting rid of one Mark Trumbo contract can make room for a whole lot of really good baseball people throughout the system -- this is not to say that we don't have some really good baseball people on board, we just don't have enough of them functioning as a winning team, seamless from warehouse to clubhouse.

We do have some promising talent that is MLB ready or close to it, and we should get pretty good returns for some of the players we would sell, so maybe the O's won't have to wait four or five yeas before putting a competitive team on the field again. That's my hope, anyway. Am I dreaming?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it has been absolutely obvious for well over a year now that the time to sell was yesterday. Yes, its time to sell. The events of the last week have made it where only a clowns crew would continue with this "go for it in 2018" malarkey. That's why I expect the O's to sell nobody, and go for it in 2018.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, theobird said:

it has been absolutely obvious for well over a year now that the time to sell was yesterday. Yes, its time to sell. The events of the last week have made it where only a clowns crew would continue with this "go for it in 2018" malarkey. That's why I expect the O's to sell nobody, and go for it in 2018.

I'm afraid this is the likely direction.   Last offseason would have been the time to sell on Machado and Britton.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • No one is trading anything close to that for Crochet. But I agree..spend money, not prospects.
    • That's some high standards.  Sinker ball types are always going to have higher FIPs and lower K rates.  The truth is, Quintana is probably out of our price range.  That price range is probably no more than the standard Lyles/Gibson/Kimbrel/Frazier price range until otherwise seen.   Back to Quintana, I think he's the type of guy that if healthy could be a real weapon for us with our home ballpark and a home playoff game if we ever get deep into a series.  
    • That's really the role/opening for next year that we need.  A RHH OF that could play some CF preferably.  Although, I'd lean more to and offensive minded portion of that versus the ability to play CF.  LF is big though at home. I think it's a role that Elias fills through trade, waivers, or maybe even a competition of milb deal types.  Like a RH Sam Hilliard type.  
    • Yeah, he would be good in the Austin Slater role if he was willing to accept it. Not sure that he would be quite as good defensively in CF, given that he has played fewer than 100 innings total in CF since 2021. I highly doubt that he is ready to accept a role as a platoon player though, given that he is not yet 30, and he was an above average starter by rWAR from 2021-23. I doubt he is tendered a contract, given his $6M 2024 salary. His best bet is probably to sign a one year deal with a team that doesn't hope to compete, to attempt to reestablish himself as an everyday player, while the team that signs him can hope to flip him at the trade deadline.
    • I agree. He’d be a great regular season fit in Cinncy’s ballpark. Maybe that confidence of knowing he can hit the ball out to LF at home covers up his other decencies.  As for Crochet… can’t we just resign Burnes?  Crochet would probably cost Holliday, Basallo, and Mayo. Didn’t the deadline teach us the cost of pitching? I’m for trading Mountcastle. I’d hope we can surround the young hitters with a Burnes led staff with adding a vet bat to the DH/1B mix. Other than that, I think we will roll with what we have. And we should. 
    • Hays will want to start somewhere. He shouldn't start for us. We don't want him sitting on the bench looking dejected while Kjerstad and Cowser are mashing bombs onto Eutaw Street.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...