Jump to content

Orioles Interested in Carlos Gonzalez?


wildbillhiccup

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, phillyOs119 said:

Hey, for what it’s worth...

Steamer projects Cargo for a 101 wRC+ 

Steamer projects Austin Hays for a  102 wRC+ 

Steamer projects Anthony Santander for a 97 wRC+

ZiPS projects Cargo for an 88 wRC+

ZiPS projects Hays for a 103 wRC+

ZiPS projects Santander for a 93 wRC+

wRC+ is a context neutral metric that tries to assess total value with the bat. It corrects for the Coors field environment among other things.

Cargo is also poor defensively which isn’t consider the numbers above.

Edit: 100 is league average for wRC+ and higher is better.

Excellent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply
5 hours ago, oriole said:

I think he'd do well in Camden Yards. Give him the pillow contract and put him in RF.

He didn’t do well in Denver last year, so Camden Yards may not be a boon for his offense. Could be the beginning of a steady decline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I just don't see the point.

Frankly it reminds me of the Dark Days and names like Payton and Millar.

Just because Dan can get someone to take his money doesn't mean he should.

What's the point in signing whatever god awful SP they'll inevitably sign? You just hope for the best. I'm not going to care much of Gonzalez isn't signed and I definitely understand why you guys don't like him...I just want to see a left handed hitter in the OF on a one year contract and Gonzalez fits that mold. Barring a meltdown in the northeast this summer coupled with an insurgence of the entire rotation (I'm still assuming whoever they sign will be awful), the O's are screwed. Gonzalez makes things more interesting from my perspective. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, oriole said:

What's the point in signing whatever god awful SP they'll inevitably sign? You just hope for the best. I'm not going to care much of Gonzalez isn't signed and I definitely understand why you guys don't like him...I just want to see a left handed hitter in the OF on a one year contract and Gonzalez fits that mold. Barring a meltdown in the northeast this summer coupled with an insurgence of the entire rotation (I'm still assuming whoever they sign will be awful), the O's are screwed. Gonzalez makes things more interesting from my perspective. 

I'd rather watch the kids.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, oriole said:

What's the point in signing whatever god awful SP they'll inevitably sign? 

Actually, I hope they do sign Vargas, Cashner or other scrubs at this point. Anyone on a cheap one year deal is acceptable. I don’t care how awful they may be. 

I’m still hoping for a rebuild and don’t want any multi year deals clogging up the possible return from Machado, Jones, Schoop or whoever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I'd rather watch the kids.

Overall I would too...but it seems too early to hand Hays the job. I feel like he still has to prove he can hit MLB pitching. A veteran stopgap would be nice, hence my support for Gonzalez.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Il BuonO said:

Actually, I hope they do sign Vargas, Cashner or other scrubs at this point. Anyone on a cheap one year deal is acceptable. I don’t care how awful they may be. 

I’m still hoping for a rebuild and don’t want any multi year deals clogging up the possible return from Machado, Jones, Schoop or whoever.

Vargas and Cashner will get multi year deals and it'll probably be for stupid money. I'm not looking forward to the day I find out who the O's overpaid to lose games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, oriole said:

Overall I would too...but it seems too early to hand Hays the job. I feel like he still has to prove he can hit MLB pitching. A veteran stopgap would be nice, hence my support for Gonzalez.

If we need a stopgap I'd rather he be a plus defender.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • If they were going to get rid of Fuller they should have done it a month and a half ago. The issues with our hitting were apparent the whole second half of the season. Maybe a firing or two would have sent a message to the players prior to their postseason fizzle. . 
    • What does Eflin and Jimenez signify? It was a very small addition to the payroll. John Angelos would have approved that, if he needed to approve anything at all.
    • I'm not sure that's quite it.  Well, more importantly, I'm not sure that's quite it for me. I absolutely want to win more in the playoffs.  At this point there's no question that for me I'd live through some lousy seasons if it guaranteed a World Series trophy.  I'd give up a lot for that. But unfortunately it's the weird paradox, especially in baseball, where the games that mean so much in terms of perception actually mean very little.   Just look at some the threads posted on this board in recent weeks. "Do the Orioles need more experience"?  (studies have shown this is not the case) "Maybe they need a certain type of hitter/approach!" (no, studies have shown that's not it either) "They must need to build their bullpen a certain way." (nope) "Well you have to be playing well in September to have a chance in October!"  (very much not true) "It must be those nice white boys need somebody to be a jerk" (OK, no real way to quantify that one :)) The Astros must have the secret sauce, they went to the ALCS a lot of times in a row!  Oh, they lost in the 1st round this year. Study after study after study shows that there is no pattern.  There is no "right" way to do it.  There's no way to predict from year to year which teams will or will not go on the run. If for that crazy 8-9th inning on the day after the season the Mets may not have even made the playoffs.  Now they're the example of guys that can "get it done". It's not an excuse, and frankly it's not really my opinion.  It's reality. I do 100% agree with your last 2 sentences.  I don't know what we've done to so displease the baseball gods.
    • It's definitely a possibility, but I wonder if there is actually something going on between Hyde and some players, would it be smart to bring his potential replacement in and subject him to the problem?    The fans, mostly here are the main source of BB being a manager. He's definitely had some MiL success so it's not unreasonable to assume he will be a manager someday. 
    • I think this is spot on in every way.  But I think the fanbase is somewhat divided on how important playoff success is. Put another way, for you, me, and a lot of folks, the playoffs mean a ton.  41 years with no championship or even a pennant is a real long time, and the narrative of the Orioles since 1983 has gotten extremely old. Even the narrative of this winless recent edition of the Os has gotten old. For other fans, the regular season means much more and winning/losing in the playoffs doesn't carry much weight because of the nature of the tournament.   There is no right or wrong way to be a fan of a team. But I can say that if you told me the next 10 years would involve 9 seasons where we lose 90+ games and 1 season where we win the World Series, I will gladly sign up for that.  I am definitely at that point where that title means everything to me and yes 29 teams go home without the ring each year, but 1 team does get it and that needs to be us. And if we get "lucky" like the Tigers on the path there, then bring it on! If the playoffs are a crapshoot, I am tired of that crapshoot rewarding everyone else.
    • More than once Fredi displayed a lack of control that cost him his job. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...