Jump to content

Orioles Interested in Carlos Gonzalez?


wildbillhiccup

Recommended Posts

On 1/5/2018 at 4:31 PM, Enjoy Terror said:

Because it's a game of quality not quantity. Jones and Mancini are the only two you named with any sort of Major League success.

Well that's because Hays, our #1 prospect, has only played in twenty MLB games. 

As for the back ups, Rickard is increasingly registering as an above average defensive corner outfielder.  He also has a career .333 OBP against lefties and has stolen 12 bases in 14 attempts as an Oriole.

I'm not saying we have the best outfield in the majors, but it has a lot of upside, youth, and depth.  I want the Orioles to be laser focused on addressing their rotation issues.  I'd rather not clog up the outfield with aging players like Carlos Gonzalez, who we'd probably end up giving a multi-year deal to, and end up blocking players like Stewart and Mullins down the road.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply
39 minutes ago, TommyPickles said:

Well that's because Hays, our #1 prospect, has only played in twenty MLB games. 

As for the back ups, Rickard is increasingly registering as an above average defensive corner outfielder.  He also has a career .333 OBP against lefties and has stolen 12 bases in 14 attempts as an Oriole.

I'm not saying we have the best outfield in the majors, but it has a lot of upside, youth, and depth.  I want the Orioles to be laser focused on addressing their rotation issues.  I'd rather not clog up the outfield with aging players like Carlos Gonzalez, who we'd probably end up giving a multi-year deal to, and end up blocking players like Stewart and Mullins down the road.  

Doesn’t matter. You asked why the sheer number of outfielders wasn’t enough. The answer is because there’s no quality. Rickard will be lucky to play the majors again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Enjoy Terror said:

Doesn’t matter. You asked why the sheer number of outfielders wasn’t enough. The answer is because there’s no quality. Rickard will be lucky to play the majors again.

Why does the team need outfielders with proven major league success?  (btw I am not sold that Mancini has "proven" he can maintain a 1.8-2.2 level of production while an outfielder)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Why does the team need outfielders with proven major league success?  (btw I am not sold that Mancini has "proven" he can maintain a 1.8-2.2 level of production while an outfielder)

Mancini is on the path to superstardom!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Why does the team need outfielders with proven major league success?  (btw I am not sold that Mancini has "proven" he can maintain a 1.8-2.2 level of production while an outfielder)

Because otherwise we’re the Padres.

The Padres do inane experiments with “let’s just put all our great rookies out there and see what happens”.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Enjoy Terror said:

Doesn’t matter. You asked why the sheer number of outfielders wasn’t enough. The answer is because there’s no quality. Rickard will be lucky to play the majors again.

As I've said, I think Jones/Mancini/Hays will make a passable starting three.  I could be wrong though.  Mancini could of just been a flash in the pan, Jones' could really start showing his age, and Hays could be a total bust.  I don't think so though. I think there's a way higher chance our rotation is in the bottom 3-4 of the AL.  That's why I think the O's should focus on pitching. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TommyPickles said:

As I've said, I think Jones/Mancini/Hays will make a passable starting three.  I could be wrong though.  Mancini could of just been a flash in the pan, Jones' could really start showing his age, and Hays could be a total bust.  I don't think so though. I think there's a way higher chance our rotation is in the bottom 3-4 of the AL.  That's why I think the O's should focus on pitching. 

 

The Orioles can focus on both. Whether they choose to is another point entirely. Their pursuit of an everyday outfielder is still important. Hays is not the immediate answer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Enjoy Terror said:

The Orioles can focus on both. Whether they choose to is another point entirely. Their pursuit of an everyday outfielder is still important. Hays is not the immediate answer.

I can't figure out how their search for an everyday outfielder has anything to do with someone who can no longer field his position and doesn't hit outside of Coors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mdbdotcom said:

I can't figure out how their search for an everyday outfielder has anything to do with someone who can no longer field his position and doesn't hit outside of Coors.

I choose to believe his last two months are closer to his real value and can be had at a discount. I think he’s worth pursuit for a light contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Enjoy Terror said:

I choose to believe his last two months are closer to his real value and can be had at a discount. I think he’s worth pursuit for a light contract.

An outfield of Jones, Gonzalez and Mancini would make for a lot of chasing of baseballs that have already landed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Enjoy Terror said:

Because otherwise we’re the Padres.

The Padres do inane experiments with “let’s just put all our great rookies out there and see what happens”.

And the Orioles do things like play "What washed up kinda-was is willing to take our money this offseason?".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, TommyPickles said:

As I've said, I think Jones/Mancini/Hays will make a passable starting three.  I could be wrong though.  Mancini could of just been a flash in the pan, Jones' could really start showing his age, and Hays could be a total bust.  I don't think so though. I think there's a way higher chance our rotation is in the bottom 3-4 of the AL.  That's why I think the O's should focus on pitching. 

 

Mancini was an average starter last year in his breakout. I don’t have the expectations of superstardom so many in our fanbase do. I still see him as a tweener. Passably bad in the outfield but with enough bat to make him reasonably valuable. Not enough bat to be great at first. The discipline problems limit his ceiling.

Jones has already really started showing his age. He’s near the slowest center fielder in MLB. His defense has fallen off a cliff. He’s constantly banged up. While his offense bounced back a bit from 2016, it’s still pretty clearly declining.

Hays can’t be counted on for much at this point, and I have concerns about him long term either. He has the same plate discipline issues that plague seemingly every player that plays for this team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • If they were going to get rid of Fuller they should have done it a month and a half ago. The issues with our hitting were apparent the whole second half of the season. Maybe a firing or two would have sent a message to the players prior to their postseason fizzle. . 
    • What does Eflin and Jimenez signify? It was a very small addition to the payroll. John Angelos would have approved that, if he needed to approve anything at all.
    • I'm not sure that's quite it.  Well, more importantly, I'm not sure that's quite it for me. I absolutely want to win more in the playoffs.  At this point there's no question that for me I'd live through some lousy seasons if it guaranteed a World Series trophy.  I'd give up a lot for that. But unfortunately it's the weird paradox, especially in baseball, where the games that mean so much in terms of perception actually mean very little.   Just look at some the threads posted on this board in recent weeks. "Do the Orioles need more experience"?  (studies have shown this is not the case) "Maybe they need a certain type of hitter/approach!" (no, studies have shown that's not it either) "They must need to build their bullpen a certain way." (nope) "Well you have to be playing well in September to have a chance in October!"  (very much not true) "It must be those nice white boys need somebody to be a jerk" (OK, no real way to quantify that one :)) The Astros must have the secret sauce, they went to the ALCS a lot of times in a row!  Oh, they lost in the 1st round this year. Study after study after study shows that there is no pattern.  There is no "right" way to do it.  There's no way to predict from year to year which teams will or will not go on the run. If for that crazy 8-9th inning on the day after the season the Mets may not have even made the playoffs.  Now they're the example of guys that can "get it done". It's not an excuse, and frankly it's not really my opinion.  It's reality. I do 100% agree with your last 2 sentences.  I don't know what we've done to so displease the baseball gods.
    • It's definitely a possibility, but I wonder if there is actually something going on between Hyde and some players, would it be smart to bring his potential replacement in and subject him to the problem?    The fans, mostly here are the main source of BB being a manager. He's definitely had some MiL success so it's not unreasonable to assume he will be a manager someday. 
    • I think this is spot on in every way.  But I think the fanbase is somewhat divided on how important playoff success is. Put another way, for you, me, and a lot of folks, the playoffs mean a ton.  41 years with no championship or even a pennant is a real long time, and the narrative of the Orioles since 1983 has gotten extremely old. Even the narrative of this winless recent edition of the Os has gotten old. For other fans, the regular season means much more and winning/losing in the playoffs doesn't carry much weight because of the nature of the tournament.   There is no right or wrong way to be a fan of a team. But I can say that if you told me the next 10 years would involve 9 seasons where we lose 90+ games and 1 season where we win the World Series, I will gladly sign up for that.  I am definitely at that point where that title means everything to me and yes 29 teams go home without the ring each year, but 1 team does get it and that needs to be us. And if we get "lucky" like the Tigers on the path there, then bring it on! If the playoffs are a crapshoot, I am tired of that crapshoot rewarding everyone else.
    • More than once Fredi displayed a lack of control that cost him his job. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...