Jump to content

Buy-low fourth starter candidates I like better than Cashner


Frobby

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 98
  • Created
  • Last Reply
17 hours ago, Aristotelian said:

Feldman would be such a DD move, but no, I do not think he would be better than Cashner, just cheaper and you get what you pay for.

Feldman is a Buck guy. When Buck was the Rangers manager,they wanted to send Feldman down. Buck liked his makeup and said don't sent him down to the minors.The Orioles had him once and I am not sure they will have him twice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, weams said:

Cashner is top 6% MLB

 

Hmmm, a new toy!    I’m going to take these quality of pitch rankings with a huge grain of salt.    Here’s a chart showing the overall quality of pitches for every Oriole pitcher in 2017.    By that measure, our worst pitcher was....Mychal Givens.    Among our starters, the best quality of pitches was.....Wade Miley.    Ubaldo ranked above Bundy by a substantial margin.   Whatever they’re sellin’, I’m not buyin’.

2017-qopa-baltimore.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Hmmm, a new toy!    I’m going to take these quality of pitch rankings with a huge grain of salt.    Here’s a chart showing the overall quality of pitches for every Oriole pitcher in 2017.    By that measure, our worst pitcher was....Mychal Givens.    Among our starters, the best quality of pitches was.....Wade Miley.    Ubaldo ranked above Bundy by a substantial margin.   Whatever they’re sellin’, I’m not buyin’.

2017-qopa-baltimore.pdf

MLB Network ran a segment with Carlos Pena extolling the virtues of this type of pitch evaluation. I. for one, do not think it is a stat. I think it is an opinion with data attached. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, weams said:

MLB Network ran a segment with Carlos Pena extolling the virtues of this type of pitch evaluation. I. for one, do not think it is a stat. I think it is an opinion with data attached. 

I am filing this under:  Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics.  This saying came about as a result of statistics being used to bolster weak arguments.  This may well be a textbook example.  At least based on what Frobby just showed...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, foxfield said:

I am filing this under:  Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics.  This saying came about as a result of statistics being used to bolster weak arguments.  This may well be a textbook example.  At least based on what Frobby just showed...

1

Defensive metrics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cashner can still touch 97 at times, based on some video I've seen of him last season. That's interesting. Spots a decent 94 mph fastball most of the time. The low strikeouts isn't what you want to see, but his velocity is good. I think we could do a lot worse. I don't like 3 years, but I'd jump at 2 years just to have a solid rotation foundation of Bundy, Gausman, Cashner. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, interloper said:

Cashner can still touch 97 at times, based on some video I've seen of him last season. That's interesting. Spots a decent 94 mph fastball most of the time. The low strikeouts isn't what you want to see, but his velocity is good. I think we could do a lot worse. I don't like 3 years, but I'd jump at 2 years just to have a solid rotation foundation of Bundy, Gausman, Cashner. 

I wouldn't be opposed to two years at a reasonable price, but I don't think that gets it done and that's where my problems lie. Like many, I fear Gallardo 2.0. Cashner is a fine No.4 or No.5 starter, but he's going to be paid more than other No.4, No.5 starters on the market. If I'm the Orioles and I don't fill the rotation via the Machado trade (or other trades), I'm looking more at Jamie Garcia and Miguel Gonzalez before Cashner. Of course, I'm also looking at Cobb or Lynn along with one of the other two and we'll probably end up with Cashner and Vargas so it really doesn't matter what I'm looking for....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't really see how Gallardo and Cashner are that similar. Gallardo had a shoulder injury which made his velocity top out at like, 86 on most nights. His changeup was like 83. 

I'm not saying Cashner would be markedly better than Gallardo, but he does have health and velocity on his side. Two things Gallardo did not. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, interloper said:

I don't really see how Gallardo and Cashner are that similar. Gallardo had a shoulder injury which made his velocity top out at like, 86 on most nights. His changeup was like 83. 

I'm not saying Cashner would be markedly better than Gallardo, but he does have health and velocity on his side. Two things Gallardo did not. 

97 is 97. And Projection systems are just that. I can work with 97. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I mean Adley’s attempted hit vs Witt is a good example. Adley hit it harder…but missed for a few feet. That happens. But even softly hit balls find green…the Os aren’t..others are…like Detroit..like KC vs us. They win on an IF hit, Westburg’s ball is a homer in 28 of 30 parks.   
    • If they were going to get rid of Fuller they should have done it a month and a half ago. The issues with our hitting were apparent the whole second half of the season. Maybe a firing or two would have sent a message to the players prior to their postseason fizzle. . 
    • What does Eflin and Jimenez signify? It was a very small addition to the payroll. John Angelos would have approved that, if he needed to approve anything at all.
    • I'm not sure that's quite it.  Well, more importantly, I'm not sure that's quite it for me. I absolutely want to win more in the playoffs.  At this point there's no question that for me I'd live through some lousy seasons if it guaranteed a World Series trophy.  I'd give up a lot for that. But unfortunately it's the weird paradox, especially in baseball, where the games that mean so much in terms of perception actually mean very little.   Just look at some the threads posted on this board in recent weeks. "Do the Orioles need more experience"?  (studies have shown this is not the case) "Maybe they need a certain type of hitter/approach!" (no, studies have shown that's not it either) "They must need to build their bullpen a certain way." (nope) "Well you have to be playing well in September to have a chance in October!"  (very much not true) "It must be those nice white boys need somebody to be a jerk" (OK, no real way to quantify that one :)) The Astros must have the secret sauce, they went to the ALCS a lot of times in a row!  Oh, they lost in the 1st round this year. Study after study after study shows that there is no pattern.  There is no "right" way to do it.  There's no way to predict from year to year which teams will or will not go on the run. If for that crazy 8-9th inning on the day after the season the Mets may not have even made the playoffs.  Now they're the example of guys that can "get it done". It's not an excuse, and frankly it's not really my opinion.  It's reality. I do 100% agree with your last 2 sentences.  I don't know what we've done to so displease the baseball gods.
    • It's definitely a possibility, but I wonder if there is actually something going on between Hyde and some players, would it be smart to bring his potential replacement in and subject him to the problem?    The fans, mostly here are the main source of BB being a manager. He's definitely had some MiL success so it's not unreasonable to assume he will be a manager someday. 
    • I think this is spot on in every way.  But I think the fanbase is somewhat divided on how important playoff success is. Put another way, for you, me, and a lot of folks, the playoffs mean a ton.  41 years with no championship or even a pennant is a real long time, and the narrative of the Orioles since 1983 has gotten extremely old. Even the narrative of this winless recent edition of the Os has gotten old. For other fans, the regular season means much more and winning/losing in the playoffs doesn't carry much weight because of the nature of the tournament.   There is no right or wrong way to be a fan of a team. But I can say that if you told me the next 10 years would involve 9 seasons where we lose 90+ games and 1 season where we win the World Series, I will gladly sign up for that.  I am definitely at that point where that title means everything to me and yes 29 teams go home without the ring each year, but 1 team does get it and that needs to be us. And if we get "lucky" like the Tigers on the path there, then bring it on! If the playoffs are a crapshoot, I am tired of that crapshoot rewarding everyone else.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...