Jump to content

Who’s our GM & Manager Next Year?


Rene88

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, foxfield said:

 

In a way, I take issue with both sides here.   TNT, I didn't give credit to AM in my above post, but my post was not about credit as much as it was about how much losing has occurred in the last 25 years.  But I supported AM when he was here and defend him still.  He laid a foundation that allowed DD to be successful.  That said, his tenure did more to regain some respect within baseball that is still below where it was when you and I first became Oriole fans.  Andy Macphail did not hire Buck Showalter or more accurately did so when he was told to do so.  But that is not relevant...both men deserve credit but it's tricky to stretch who did what based on acquisition.  Mark Trumbo is a perfect example.  His acquisition was brilliant and worked to perfection.  It should have meant that Trumbo replaced Chris Davis but alas that did not happen and then Trumbo leaving did not happen....he was resigned, which could still work, but is pretty deep in a hole today.  There are moves I lay at DD's feet and you laid them out well last night.  But I don't blame him for resigning Trumbo, or signing Davis.

My point is AM's teams were terrible and while that suckitude produced Matt Wieters and Manny Machado, the losses were unbearable.  The trade of Bedard is legendary and pays dividends today.   DD said he would win from day one and has delivered.  He may well leave the team in a bad spot and I have said repeatedly his final grade is still to be determined.  But the facts are he has delivered 4 winning seasons, 1 .500 season and this years losing season.  The 19 years that preceded him produced 15 losing seasons.  I also said, I would be open to a change...so in your words, I may not extend him either.  I simply believe that we easily dismiss him, when the indisputable fact is he is the most successful GM in the Angelos era.

Cimota, TNT makes the very fair and reasonable point that any "credit" to DD has to acknowledge some foundational work done by AM.  As I try to say above, it is dangerous to say for example that everyone was here already.  I say this because DD could have traded any of those folks and as his detractors point out traded perhaps some folks who kept him from getting us back to the WS.  I think THAT criticism is fair.  I think the debate on credit is fair, but I think acquisition is not really the ideal way to make that determination.

Finally, If DD left today, without signing a pitcher or anyone else to go with this roster, the team, and the farm are better than when he got here.  As Frobby points out above, even with the Oriole specific "issues" this job will be easier for the next guy. All of that said, we are in a sticky situation between trying to compete and trying to rebuild and trading say Manny or all of our prospects for one or two starters could rework the above opinion.  Its an unfinished job and I appreciate the desire to have a new GM...but any fair comparison of DD to his Peter Angelos companions is favorable, even if you ding him for not resigning like Hemond and Gillick.

A good post.  Thanks.  If the team finishes last in 2018, 2019,  or 2020  and if they finish first in 2018, 2019, or 2020 then I will, either way,  revisit my grades regarding Duquette’s tenure.    I also think that Dan’s performance in 2012-2014 was significantly better than it has been in the time since the winter of 2014 after we won the division.  And I admit that I have had a bit of difficulty getting past the Toronto situation occurring right at that same time that our window was at its highest peak ever from 2012 till now. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 314
  • Created
  • Last Reply
11 hours ago, cimota said:

DD won't be back next year because he won't want the job.  He tried to leave once and Angelo's wouldn't let him.   He should be able to get a job with another team where he will have more control. 

How much of that, was DD wanted out, or he listened to an offer for employement elsewhere?

Heck, I am happy where I am at, that doesn't mean, I have listened when a serious offer came my way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/25/2018 at 7:26 AM, Redskins Rick said:

How much of that, was DD wanted out, or he listened to an offer for employement elsewhere?

Heck, I am happy where I am at, that doesn't mean, I have listened when a serious offer came my way.

Do you think you would be happy in DD's situation?  Where you have a former player, the manager, and the owner's sons all having a huge influence on  decisions that appear to be everyone to be yours.  And an owner who takes forever to approve your decisions.  There is a reason that the team had to hire someone who had been out of baseball for 10 years.  DD hasn't been out of baseball for 10 years.  Other teams know DD has to deal with and see he has improved the organization.  I don't think he will have a hard time finding another job with more autonomy.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, cimota said:

Do you think you would be happy in DD's situation?  Where you have a former player, the manager, and the owner's sons all having a huge influence on  decisions that appear to be everyone to be yours.  And an owner who takes forever to approve your decisions.  There is a reason that the team had to hire someone who had been out of baseball for 10 years.  DD hasn't been out of baseball for 10 years.  Other teams know DD has to deal with and see he has improved the organization.  I don't think he will have a hard time finding another job with more autonomy.  

We’ll see soon enough.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/24/2018 at 4:26 PM, Frobby said:

I’m not convinced that our GM job will be as hard to fill in 2018 as it was in 2011.     Yes there are still major issues, but (1) we haven’t had 14 losing seasons in a row, (2) several of the characters who were part of the pre-2011 dysfunction have been cleared out and anyone hired by Duquette would be subject to replacement at the new GM’s whim, and (3) it’s been established that it’s possible to build a winning team here.  This still might not be at the top of prospective GMs’ list of places to go, but it’s not like the better jobs open up all that often.    

Dan will find another job but it may not be a GM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, El Gordo said:

Dan will find another job but it may not be a GM

The Jays wanted him two years ago to oversee their entire operations, which included the business side as well as the baseball side.  Angelos dug his heels in, and the Jays and Orioles couldn't agree on compensation.  This was just three years after DD took over the Orioles, and seemed to be making move after move to find this player on the dumpster pile, get that player at a bargain, etc.  All from a guy who was out of baseball for most than a decade. 

Considering he has made public this winter what constraints that ownership puts on him- specifically with pitcher contracts, payroll and especially with how the team approaches the international/posting market- DD will find a job in short order, and maybe something that ends up being a promotion.  Angelos got away on a technicality where teams are usually forced to allow their execs to interview for promotions, but since DD is already at the top of the organization with how Angelos constructs it, MLB couldn't force the issue.  

Anyway, I digress.  I see another Duquette/Flanagan situation arising here if Angelos doesn't extend DD, where Showalter and Anderson are made co-GMs.  It didn't work the first time, and I don't expect it to work again, but something tells me we are going to go down this route again.  And then we will be limited in who we hire to be the manager of this club, because who is going to want to go to work for two GMs, who up until taking the job were intricately involved in the clubhouse- one managing the club, the other having a locker there.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Joe Girardi ?

John Farrell ?

Tony Pena ?

Willie Randoph ?

Joe McEwing ?

Manny Acta ?

Ron Wotus ?

Fred Gonzalez ?

David Ross ?

Ross, Wotus and McEwing are not big names but future managers! When ? Mickey Callaway is a star with pitchers and a sleeper pick a year ago with these three names. Where is he now? Managing the Mets and doing a great job.  Currently 12-3 and their staff is improved.  How many people know who the current Mets manager is? Some will say Brady Anderson. Maybe !  Girardi ? Only if the warehouse thinks they need a big name.  Buck's time here is nearing an end it seems.  Refusal to make the needed changes and sticking with veterans too long will be his downfall. Girardi or Ross two ex-catchers could be in line along with Ron Wotus of the Giants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a fine line between a retread and a young up and comer that's intriguing but unproven.

As I've been saying recently though, the next manager doesn't really matter unless there's a better roster in place.  If the Orioles have a 70 win roster type in place next season I'd be more inclined to try out a Gabe Kapler type who has no idea what he's doing instead of someone more proven.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • The earliest 2025 NFBC results exist, and slotted him about the 30th best AL starter for 2025 alone's expected statistical production.    Eflin and all five guys in Tampa's forecast rotation (Baz, McClanahan, Pepiot, Bradley, Springs) fell around that level. That assumes free agents Burnes, Snell, Flaherty, Kikuchi, Pivetta, Fried and Manaea fall about half into the AL. He'll start Opening Day, but it is a byproduct of the disappointing beginning to Grayson's career and Bradish's current injury. I think odds are pretty low he is a 2026 Oriole.
    • Whoever we add needs to be able to play a solid CF or LF at OPACY and Pham definitely does not fit that bill.
    • I'm one for Tommy Pham, even though I'll take heat for it.  I think the veteran aspect of it could be key. O'Neil would be great, but he also brings more of what we have in the Ks and HRs department
    • Let's see how he does over a full year here first so we don't overpay for a SSS. He was pretty pedestrian prior to the trade.
    • I could see against tough lefties Holiday sits, Westy at 2B, and Mayo at 3B.  Or Holiday at SS to spell Gunnar sometimes too and this being the configuration. But yes, most of Holiday at 2B, Westy at 3B and Mayo DH or 1B.
    • I don't think you bring Slater back if you add Bader (unless Austin's willing to take a MiLB deal and start the year at Norfolk) because then you have to get rid of either Urias or Mateo, and that doesn't seem wise with how thinned out the IF depth is now and Holliday still trying to get his feet under him.
    • This is true. However, it is more situational in the post season. Guys are pitched to differently. You have to take what the game gives you. Home runs happen, but the best teams know when to take that shot and when to shorten up or be more line drive oriented. Home runs can be a surprise to good hitters who simply were in time and put a good swing on plane through the ball. It was a line drive that ran out of field. Hitters have to know who they are. Some sit on fast balls early in the count in a certain small box. If they get it, they take that A swing. Or maybe they sit off speed early. They may take a strike that is more of a pitcher’s pitch, or one they were not looking for. if you’re sitting fastball early, not a great idea to swing at a curveball. Or vice versa. Whatever the case, with two strikes, you have to think contact and productive at bat. For some, that approach may be sooner in the at bat, of the situation dictates it. There is no BABIP if there is not a ball in play. So luck plays no role in a strikeout. It seemed like the Orioles, as a whole, in 2024 were looking a certain pitch, and if the pitch was hittable they would hack. Even if it was just off the plate. Too many big swings, and tons of resulting misses, in key situations where shortening up a bit was the better approach. Lastly, not many of our guys are true “home run hitters.” What I mean by that is when Santander strikes out swinging at a piece ch with a big cut. I get it. That is his game to be focused on driving the ball. That is what he gets paid to do. Along with that comes a fair amount of swing and miss, and roll over ground balls. Not all our hitters should be having the same approach. Gunnar may hit 35-40 home runs in a season, but he is a much more dynamic hitter than just a “home run guy.” He is capable of doing anything on the field. He is extremely talented, and we have a few more that may fall into that category some day. There are times to adjust and take what the game gives you. Go oppo for a single, put pressure on the defense. This game is hard, but we can do better. If we are going to win, we must do much better.   
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...