Jump to content

Which outcome would you prefer?


Frobby

Which outcome would you prefer?  

103 members have voted

  1. 1. Which outcome would you prefer?

    • Orioles continue to play sub-.333 baseball and get the no. 1 pick
    • Orioles play .500 baseball from here and get the 6th overall pick


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 104
  • Created
  • Last Reply

A losing season is a losing season.  I'd rather lose 95 or 100 and get the pick, PLUS the added bonus of it spurring the team to really make the necessary changes (getting Davis out of the lineup, moving the pending FAs, etc.).  If they somehow end up losing only 85-90 games or so, then they might rationalize the horrible start to bad luck, etc., and not rip the band-aid off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, InsideCoroner said:

Get the 1st pick. Better a bride than a bridesmaid.  Plus I'm worried if they start to play decent ball for the next month, they might get it in their heads that they're only one or two pieces away from a potential postseason shot, and trade away prospects rather than the established veterans for the 2018 version of Scott Feldman or Michael Morse. Please, no.  

There’s no way anybody’s thinking that.   The Orioles are 17.5 games out of the 2nd wild card.    These people may be unrealistically optimistic at times, but that would be lunacy.    Nobody’s that stupid.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Frobby said:

There’s no way anybody’s thinking that.   The Orioles are 17.5 games out of the 2nd wild card.    These people may be unrealistically optimistic at times, but that would be lunacy.    Nobody’s that stupid.   

O's front office and ownership:  "Hold my beer."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't get it? What's the point of watching the games of there's no chance of them plying well. I want them to always win of course but the main thing is that they play well and give me a good game. Otherwise why watch at all?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Frobby said:

There’s no way anybody’s thinking that.   The Orioles are 17.5 games out of the 2nd wild card.    These people may be unrealistically optimistic at times, but that would be lunacy.    Nobody’s that stupid.   

Except OHer's who actually believe the O's FO is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

o

 

This subject has been discussed on numerous occasions before.

 

Like our beloved Weams, I am incapable of rooting against the Orioles under any circumstances whatsoever.

Hypothetically, if it were late in the season and the Orioles were mathematically out of it and were playing the Indians, and a loss would knock the Yankees out of the playoffs, I would root for the Orioles to win the game. I might be happy AFTER THE FACT if the Orioles lost the game and sent the Yankees home packing, but that would be AFTER THE FACT. There is no way in hell that I could ever root against the Orioles, the Colts, the Bullets, Nebraska football, or North Carolina basketball for any reason(s) whatsoever.

 

Like Weams, rooting against any of my favorite teams under any circumstances whatsoever is just not in my DNA.

 

o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, weams said:

I have no reason to believe that the Orioles would pick the right guy number one. Six works for me. 

This is not just the Orioles.  Every club has problems picking the right guy.

If you have not done it google "2006 MLB draft".  Then change the year  to 2007, 2008 etc.

It shows just how many 1st round players never make it.  And how many top 5 picks never become All-Stars.

Don't blame just the O's.  Its a crap shoot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Plutarch said:

Would a 500 record for the rest of the year make the FO think that this could be a competitive team next year thus limiting the deals they consummate before the deadlines (Machado and Britton and any other pending FA excluded)?

 I'd rather have the "No Doubt About It" scenario of the dumpster fire

Ownership might think they could be competitive next year if they have .300 record the rest of the way.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Give me .500 ball from here on out. That would mean our rotation is pitching better, maybe Mancini, Schoop and Davis are getting back to career norms, and the young players we get for Manny, Britton and Brach are producing. Maybe some of our young outfielders are up and producing......I want to go into the off season thinking this team is on the rebound and might not be 5 years away from competing again. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, OFFNY said:

o

 

This subject has been discussed on numerous occasions before.

 

Like our beloved Weams, I am incapable of rooting against the Orioles under any circumstances whatsoever.

Hypothetically, if it were late in the season and the Orioles were mathematically out of it and were playing the Indians, and a loss would knock the Yankees out of the playoffs, I would root for the Orioles to win the game. I might be happy AFTER THE FACT if the Orioles lost the game and sent the Yankees home packing, but that would be AFTER THE FACT. There is no way in hell that I could ever root against the Orioles, the Colts, the Bullets, Nebraska football, or North Carolina basketball for any reason(s) whatsoever.

 

Like Weams, rooting against any of my favorite teams under any circumstances whatsoever is just not in my DNA.

 

o

Are you implying you love this team more that those who favor the other outcome?  I and others want what’s best for the team in the long run. If we had more responsible ownership, I may feel the way you do. Technically, I’ve been a fan longer than you, but that doesn’t make me more of a fan. 

This team is like watching a dying animal and euthanasia is the humane choice. Play the kids. Trade what’s not nailed down and get the #1 pick. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, wildcard said:

This is not just the Orioles.  Every club has problems picking the right guy.

If you have not done it google "2006 MLB draft".  Then change the year  to 2007, 2008 etc.

It shows just how many 1st round players never make it.  And how many top 5 picks never become All-Stars.

Don't blame just the O's.  Its a crap shoot.

I did not blame the Orioles. This is not basketball and there is not LeBron James to be had. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, OFFNY said:

o

 

This subject has been discussed on numerous occasions before.

 

Like our beloved Weams, I am incapable of rooting against the Orioles under any circumstances whatsoever.

Hypothetically, if it were late in the season and the Orioles were mathematically out of it and were playing the Indians, and a loss would knock the Yankees out of the playoffs, I would root for the Orioles to win the game. I might be happy AFTER THE FACT if the Orioles lost the game and sent the Yankees home packing, but that would be AFTER THE FACT. There is no way in hell that I could ever root against the Orioles, the Colts, the Bullets, Nebraska football, or North Carolina basketball for any reason(s) whatsoever.

 

Like Weams, rooting against any of my favorite teams under any circumstances whatsoever is just not in my DNA.

 

o

 

 

12 minutes ago, NashLumber said:

 

Are you implying that you love this team more that those who favor the other outcome?  I and others want what’s best for the team in the long run. If we had more responsible ownership, I may feel the way that you do. Technically, Ive been a fan longer than you, but that doesnt make me more of a fan. 

This team is like watching a dying animal, and euthanasia is the humane choice. 

 

o

 

I am implying EXACTLY what I wrote.

There are no hidden/covert messages in my sentiments.

I don't care what other Oriole fans think and/or what their rooting philosophy is.

 

o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Frobby said:

I know many people are going to say that if we’re going to stink, we need to really stink as badly as possible to get the best draft pick.    But I don’t know if I can endure a whole season of playing like we’ve played so far.    I know there’s probably some happy medium where we play a little better but still finish last, but putting that to one side, would you prefer that we continue playing sub-.333 baseball and get the top pick, or that we play respectably from here (.500) and end up with the 6th pick or so?     If those are the two choices, which do you choose?

This is the proverbial chose your death question.  Would you rather hang or be shot by firing squad.  Well to be honest I'd rather live.  What we do from here certainly matters and given your choices, Id rather watch us play good baseball.

But 1st, 5th, 7th really does not matter as much as what we do about a rebuild.  It really scares me the we are  likely to start a rebuild with out a defined plan or leader.  We are sort of going for it as it were.  If we keep doing that, we cannot begin to right the ship.

I really would like to see a GM named...and then rebuild.  Starting today.  We won't of course, we will trade assets by committee with some wanting to retool and some wanting rebuild.  The consequences of haphazardly going through this could do lots of damage.

Rebuild or reload, Fire extend or hire.....But doing the same thing and expecting the results to improve is insane.

So my answer is whatever gets us to better baseball the soonest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • He was allowed to face LHP.  My post wasn’t disagreeing with your post.  I was saying that not only did we let him face LHP, we let him do so despite not having much success against LHP.  I was pushing back against the narrative that we needlessly platooned Cowser.  Not only did we not platoon him, there is a reasonable argument that we should have platooned more than we did. We needed to play one of Mullins and Cowser in CF. Cowser mostly got the call vs. LHP because he was much better against LHP in the first half of the year, but this flipped in the second half.
    • From Adley to Basallo, I think Elias has eight Bats I hope we get to see all take 600 PA simultaneously some season. Adley was born in 1998, and until he arrived Elias Orioles baseball was bad by design.    For flavor, leaders of those teams like 1994-1997 births Mullins, Santander, Hays and Mountcastle are all between 10th and 20th among bats born their year.   Your team might be drafting Jackson Holliday if they are your club's best players in a rebuild, unless you have great pitching, which...haha, we know Elias' game. MLB Baseball is mostly played by guys 24-32.    286 batters cleared 300 PA in 2024 - about 12% were 33 and up by Fangraphs seasonal age assignments, about 8% were 23 and down. This is just a once a year post, but looking at Bats born from Adley's 1998 to Basallo's 2004, here's how the Orioles achievements compare with MLB's best by rWAR. 1998 - Adley is 4th 1999 - Westburg is 9th, and Kjerstad is 33rd 2000 - Cowser is 16th 2001 - Gunnar is 1st, and Mayo is nearly last, having dug a deep hole in his initial PA.    Trivia - Darell Hernaiz one of the 3 beneath Mayo.    Noelvi Marte dead last also has a PED suspension, d'oh. 2003 - Holliday is 4th - Minnesota the last weekend he got himself out of negative WAR territory. 2004 - Basallo is n/a as Chourio alone has played MLB from that birth year.    Basallo did log the most high minors experience of the 2004 births during the 2024 season. In 2025, Gunnar enters the 24-32 range as Judge departs it.     Cowser's improvement after an off-season a story of comfort for Holliday and Mayo - can they approach his ~3.5 win contribution? Strong, young teams - doing this exercise highlighted Adley's Orioles a little younger than the Braves and all their famous contract extensions.    Acuna, Albies and Riley were all born the year before Adley.   On the AL side of the competition, Yordan and Kyle Tucker also 1997 holding up a strong competitor, though not one that is young anymore.     Judge and Gerrit hoping Soto please stays.    Soto from 1998 - you have to reach back to 1994 for Correa, Bregman and C. Seager to find anyone ahead of him.
    • The Orioles have a lot of flexibility both in terms of prospects, money and potential veterans that hold value. Vets - I could see the Orioles moving on from any of Mountcastle, Mullins, Urias, or O'Hearn. These players may hold the most potential to bullpen upgrades. Money - The Orioles will certainly spend this offseason and that more flexibility than they have had.  I would like to see 1 or 2 extensions, 1 high profile FA, and maybe 1 more solid addition. Prospects - I could see any of the big 4 going somewhere.  I really think the Orioles and Pirates match up really well.  The Pirates have a plethora of young pitchers and the Orioles have young hitters.  I wouldn't be surprised to see the two match up.
    • The hitting philosophy works. That’s why they have been winning the last two years.     Plenty of runs scoring off HR’s in the playoffs. 
    • They would probably want two of Mayo, Basallo, Holliday, and Kjerstad, plus other pieces (likely at least one good pitching prospect, so someone like Povich or McDermott), for both Crochet and Robert.
    • I hadn't digested before today that Andrew Walters, college relief prospect Elias wasn't able to sign from the '22 draft, became a '23 Cleveland selection and is in their postseason bullpen in '24. It looks like the regular season results were pretty extreme effectively wild - 6/5 K/BB in 8.2 innings, but just 1 hit. Walters taking the extra year at Miami got himself up to nearly a $1M bonus.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...