Jump to content

Chris Davis 2019 and beyond


Camden_yardbird

Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, weams said:

If you never used him, you could easily get a judgement for all monies owed and damages if it could be shown that this was a bad faith measure. 

I suppose Boras could try that but Trumbo is a better 1B now and Mancini is a better DH now. There is no reason to believe Davis will improve next year to justify playing time. There is no basis for Davis playing ahead of them except for Buck. Buck is the reason both Trumbo and Davis are on the team and that forces Mancini to learn OF at the MLB level. It's just wrong. Trumbo only has 1 more year. Tell Mountcastle to learn 1b. Mountcastle and Mancini are the future until someone better comes along. I'm too emotional about Davis to be rational so I'm going to bow out now. Sorry Weams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, AnythingO's said:

He would have a $5 M/yr annuity for 22 years, be free to go to any team that would have him, and potentially make more money. If not he is a bench here warmer suffering humiliation for 4 years. Those are pretty strong motivations to me. 

Making $92m to sit on a bench traveling the country with a MLB team...oh the humility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Give him half of ‘19 and bring out the guillotine if he’s the same old Davis. I’ve also floated the idea of the payout being offered as shares in the team. Admitted I haven’t thought that part through as much as I could have. May be worthy of a discussion.

 

Until then, he’s a ...

 

ivWzUeC.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Finisher said:

Would be nice if we had a manager with enough sense to at least bench him versus lefties.

You gave 114 at bats this year to a guy with a .220 OBP and .527 OPS against lefties.

In other years that might hold some weight, but your argument is moot this year. His OPS is .585 vs. RHP.  They are both terrible. But that's not much of a glaring difference in the grand scheme of things.  Take digs at Buck for all the other crap this year, but this doesn't really back it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Morgan423 said:

Indeed. The only pressure on Davis to take a buyout would be to free him up from his contract to pursue employment with another team... and no one is chomping at the bit to sign Chris Davis.

Some folks would be intrigued with the idea of retiring at 33 with a boatload of money.

BTW Davis' rWAR is back up over -2.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Greg Pappas said:

Coupled with his historically bad play, Chris Davis is owed $92 million over the next four seasons. If you were in charge and able to make a decision, what would you do with him? Please, Vote and Reply.

Note: I'd like to thank @Frobby for his suggestion of Option 3.

I'd make him a bench player. If he gets pissed then he can retire his ass. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For me Davis sits. Mancini is given first base next year to make or break. Chris can DH occasionally or fill in for an injury. I take Chris from Spring Training and tell him he has to bunt against the shift if he wants back off the bench. That's what he is to focus on and leave him alone till he gets that right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Pheasants said:

For the last 30 days, Davis has a .239 average, though his OPS is only .645.  Maybe the question for option 3 is, is that enough to keep him? Or would a .239 with a .750 be enough?

Davis' 2012-2018 average is .236 with an .808 OPS, so I think your suggested baseline would have the entire Angelos family dancing in the streets.  I agree to having some objective baseline to make the call at the AS break next season.  I would peg it around 80 OPS+ however he arrives at it and revisit every half season from there on.  

My preference would be to cut him at the end of this season regardless, eat the money (or restructure the payments if possible), and wipe the slate as clean as possible.  His contract may not be a boat anchor, but his presence on a rebuilding team very well could be IMO.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Needless to say, I voted for no. 3.   He’s not going to take a buyout, and I just don’t think the team should walk away from $92 mm without giving Davis the offseason to try to get his act together.    If he shows that he is no better next year, time to give up and cut him after a few months.   

I don’t see that he’s blocking anybody.     Hays and Diaz haven’t played AAA yet, and Stewart had a poor last 2 months, so there’s still room for Mancini in the OF for a while.   If one of those guys proves they’re ready after a couple of months next season, that’s the time you look to cut Davis if you have to, and move Mancini to 1B.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

I don’t think Davis has character issues. But there is ample evidence he doesn’t focus 100% offensively and defensively.

It’s one thing to be bad, but at least be locked in on every pitch.  

I have witnessed way too many lack of effort plays on defense the last few weeks.  He can't hit and I doubt if that is going to change. He is the highest paid player and we are stuck with his contract.  Saying that you would expect that he would put 100% effort into everything he does on the field.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, turtlebowl said:

I have witnessed way too many lack of effort plays on defense the last few weeks.  He can't hit and I doubt if that is going to change. He is the highest paid player and we are stuck with his contract.  Saying that you would expect that he would put 100% effort into everything he does on the field.  

But look at how much work he did with Coolbaugh in the offseason!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • A player who is a FA after this year TB is not going to care where he goes. That said they only have Armstrong and Rosario. Potentially Maton. 
    • I don't think we really need to trade for CF just because we have so much depth at COF. We could promote Mayo or Kjerstad permanently and just see how they shake out, which wouldn't offensively be as bad as Mullins has been this year. Slide over Cowser to CF if we can't find that good a deal, and then go for anothter SP arm and some more depth in the pen. They don't trade Basallo because (and this is just me speculating) that they could move on from either Mountcastle or O'Hearn in the 2025-2026 offseason depending on if they can get a good return on them, like what we saw Tampa do with Austin Meadows a couple years back and the Orioles have a backup to replace said bat or bats.  In terms of who we go for, I don't really know. I don't like the idea of reuniting with Tanner Scott because his control issues and walk rate are still very present. I'm not in love with the idea of going for Kopech because the numbers and peripherals are average at best.  Carlos Estavez from the Angels, sure but how high is that asking price going to be? Whoever sells come deadline time could be interesting, as teams like the Cubs and Tigers could potentially be sellers come deadline time. Maybe even the mighty Astros who haven't been as good this year could be persuaded to sell off some talent depending on who we make available. It's a little to early to tell as of right now due to a good chunk of the sport sitting at around 500, but who knows at this point? 
    • I don’t think it will meaningfully affect who they are looking to deal at the trade deadline. The Orioles will be more inclined to include guys who they aren’t planning to add to the 40 as the last pieces in a deal, but there isn’t a huge crunch that means they NEED to clear 40 man roster space. Of all the guys after Hays on that list, I think Strowd and Young are the only ones who are high probability of being added right now. None of the other borderline guys have much trade value at all. Note Baker is out of options next year, he’s going to have to pitch well the rest of the year to warrant his spot.  I also think Luis González is going to get a look at some point and will ultimately become the new Vespi for 2025, optionable lefty riding the Norfolk shuttle. 
    • Yea, for this season. As I said, any of those guys are capable for a season or 2 but the odds are that they won’t live up to larger contracts and that you don’t want to get into expensive deals with guys like that.
    • Good question. I have been so focused on this season I have given zero thought to the 40 Man and Rule 5. I think Santander gets QO and O'Hearn goes FA. We could lose both. I don't really see any young guys that "must" be protected other than Mayo, McDermott, and S. Johnson. D. Johnson is having a nice season as CF is a need but not sure he belongs on the 40 man. Davidson is having a nice season. I could see him taking a deep depth spot to replace Zimmermann.     
    • I wonder if he could comp with the glove to a guy like Alec Bohm? Big dude, not a great defender, but doesn't kill his team and makes some great plays along the way with the glove while mashing with the bat.
    • That's good. By the time he gets back he'll almost 31, so there's some age decline uncertainty to go with the health uncertainty. I certainly won't be counting on him for anything. But you can hope 2 years of light workload (and a reinforced ligament) will rejuvenate him. 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...