Jump to content

Chris Davis 2019 and beyond


Camden_yardbird

Recommended Posts

38 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

He has a 7:1 strikeout to walk ratio in AAA.  Literally worse than Chris Davis' K:BB ratio in the majors.  And in the old days an .831 in Norfolk was a big thing.  With the new ball this year it's 100 points behind Chance Sisco and almost 200 behind DJ Stewart.

He still has a few things to work on.

If you have a minute I'd love to get your input in this thread:

There was a lot of back and forth yesterday about Mountcastle and i'd be curious to see whose side you more align with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
4 hours ago, leapinghorsered said:

 If he refuses to retire in order to collect what's left on that huge contract,  i  would make him earn every penny of it. I'd play him every inning of every game. He is blocking no one and the team has at least two, probably three more seasons of being horrible. It doesn't matter if he plays or not. If he wants his money, he plays. I would think he'd get sick of embarrassing himself at some point. 

That is an interesting idea, I had not thought of it from that angle. If warming the bench doesn't make Davis think about retiring, playing him in every game while he hits .150 might.  That would be humiliating letting his team down every night especially if they batted him cleanup and he left tons of runners on base.

On the other hand that would pretty much guarantee the Orioles would lose more than 120 games and break the 1962 Mets modern record for losses.  I don't want to see that happen and playing Davis is not a way to  maximize chances to achieve victory which is what the manager is responsible for. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

He has a 7:1 strikeout to walk ratio in AAA.  Literally worse than Chris Davis' K:BB ratio in the majors.  And in the old days an .831 in Norfolk was a big thing.  With the new ball this year it's 100 points behind Chance Sisco and almost 200 behind DJ Stewart.

 He still has a few things to work on.

Lets see he is 4th in OPS of players who have played for Norfolk this year. Only DJ Stewart, Sisco and Trumbo have higher OPS.  Of the top 14 OPS players on Norfolk 13 have played in the MLB.

Wilkerson and Satander both have lower OPS than Mountcastle and both are on the Orioles roster right now.  Satander's OPS was over 100 points lower than Mountcastle's.  

He is ready.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, atomic said:

Lets see he is 4th in OPS of players who have played for Norfolk this year. Only DJ Stewart, Sisco and Trumbo have higher OPS.  Of the top 14 OPS players on Norfolk 13 have played in the MLB.

Wilkerson and Satander both have lower OPS than Mountcastle and both are on the Orioles roster right now.  Satander's OPS was over 100 points lower than Mountcastle's.  

He is ready.  

Most of the guys at Norfolk are older, most have more experience at AAA and the majors.  None or almost none of them have a 7:1 K:BB ratio.  And almost none of them have good odds of being on the 2022 Orioles.  

There is no reason to rush Mountcastle.  September is probably okay.  But he'll likely be back at AAA for at least part of next year.  Mountcastle's AAA performance to date is probably a .700 OPS in the majors- the International League OPS is almost .800, and the average AAA guy is not a major leaguer.  A fair amount of growth is necessary for Mountcastle to be a productive major leaguer at LF/1B/DH.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/orioles/bs-sp-orioles-chris-davis-bobby-bonilla-20190701-story.html

I'm sorry but this kind of contract shows what is wrong with MLB.  Things were better before free agency started and these ridiculous contracts.  I am reluctant to even go to a game to help pay for this type of contract.  It may be worth shutting the game down for a year or two for the owners to attain a new collective bargaining agreement.  One that includes a hard salary cap and other measures that would help restore some sanity. 

"The Orioles will pay Davis $3.5 million on each July 1 from 2023 to 2032 and $1.4 million on each July 1 from 2033 to 2037. Davis will be 51 on July 1, 2037, "

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Maverick Hiker said:

https://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/orioles/bs-sp-orioles-chris-davis-bobby-bonilla-20190701-story.html

I'm sorry but this kind of contract shows what is wrong with MLB.  Things were better before free agency started and these ridiculous contracts.  I am reluctant to even go to a game to help pay for this type of contract.  It may be worth shutting the game down for a year or two for the owners to attain a new contract that includes a hard salary cap and other measures that would help restore some sanity. 

"The Orioles will pay Davis $3.5 million on each July 1 from 2023 to 2032 and $1.4 million on each July 1 from 2033 to 2037. Davis will be 51 on July 1, 2037, "

 

Yep, those billionaire owners need higher profits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

Yep, those billionaire owners need higher profits.

And those uppity ballplayers could use a hefty dose of good, old-fashioned pre-FA fiscal discipline too. Show me one ballplayer who was ever exploited by a team owner in the golden age of pro baseball before free agency.  Owners had class in those days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Maverick Hiker said:

https://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/orioles/bs-sp-orioles-chris-davis-bobby-bonilla-20190701-story.html

I'm sorry but this kind of contract shows what is wrong with MLB.  Things were better before free agency started and these ridiculous contracts.  I am reluctant to even go to a game to help pay for this type of contract.  It may be worth shutting the game down for a year or two for the owners to attain a new collective bargaining agreement.  One that includes a hard salary cap and other measures that would help restore some sanity. 

"The Orioles will pay Davis $3.5 million on each July 1 from 2023 to 2032 and $1.4 million on each July 1 from 2033 to 2037. Davis will be 51 on July 1, 2037, "

 

I was under the impression that the NFL has a hard cap, and also players who make more than any Major Leaguer by quite a bit.

The best way to keep a $10B industry from paying its employees as much as 42% of revenues would be to starve it.  We should all boycott MLB.  That'll show 'em. 

Even if you really believe that the world is better off with ballplayers making 5%, 10% (?) of revenues.  We're never going back there.  MLB players pull in a smaller percentage of revenues than any other major US sport.  If anything the next CBA will see that go up.  I'll pay to watch good baseball players.  I'd be less inclined to pay $30 a ticket to see the Angelos boys lighting cigars with $100 bills.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I was under the impression that the NFL has a hard cap, and also players who make more than any Major Leaguer by quite a bit.

The best way to keep a $10B industry from paying its employees as much as 42% of revenues would be to starve it.  We should all boycott MLB.  That'll show 'em. 

Even if you really believe that the world is better off with ballplayers making 5%, 10% (?) of revenues.  We're never going back there.  MLB players pull in a smaller percentage of revenues than any other major US sport.  If anything the next CBA will see that go up.  I'll pay to watch good baseball players.  I'd be less inclined to pay $30 a ticket to see the Angelos boys lighting cigars with $100 bills.

NFL players have shorter careers than MLB players on average, and the danger of injury in the NFL is much greater. Also the average NFL player makes about 75% of the average MLB player's salary,.  

I am old enough to recall the days before free agency started. The game was fine then and in many ways better than today. Teams stayed together and players didn't expect contracts for millions of dollars per year for years after they retired.  You may have no problem with your ticket money going to pay Chris Davis 1.4 million when he's 50 but I  do.  Yes I'd rather my money go to Angelos to build the team rather,  than to pay Chris Davis far more than what he deserves. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, 24fps said:

And those uppity ballplayers could use a hefty dose of good, old-fashioned pre-FA fiscal discipline too. Show me one ballplayer who was ever exploited by a team owner in the golden age of pro baseball before free agency.  Owners had class in those days.

So did players. Al Kaline once refused part of his salary because he had a bad year. Today's millionaire players would never think of doing that. The owners should be able to put clauses into contract such as if you hit .160 like Davis is doing then the owner has the right to void the rest of the contract or buy it out for 25% value. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Maverick Hiker said:

So did players. Al Kaline once refused part of his salary because he had a bad year. Today's millionaire players would never think of doing that. The owners should be able to put clauses into contract such as if you hit .160 like Davis is doing then the owner has the right to void the rest of the contract or buy it out for 25% value. 

That defeats the whole point of a 7 year contract.  If you thought you would play well every year you would just do single year contracts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • This is accurate based on pockets.  But the Yankees have positive Cash Flow even with the huge payroll, because they are the richest franchise in the MLB.  The fact that the owner can fund higher salaries is certainly important, but it isn't the same thing as team revenue.
    • These two paragraphs are not congruent.  I disagree that the Orioles have to resign Burnes.  I think they should be in on him, but they don't have to sign him. I completely agree that if they do not sign him the have to have another TOR.  I think counting on Bradish to return is a poor decision.  You hope so, but planning on it would be weak.  Same with assuming #2 status for Rodriquez.  His case is stronger of course, but still.  We have some depth IF we have a TOR and that should be Burnes or someone comparable.  
    • There are several. Snell, Pivetta, Bieber (depending on structure of the contract), Nick Martinez (swing type guy) and Heaney.  May be others. This is off the top of my head.
    • I think this is correct but I would say it differently.  I think Elias has done a great job constructing the organization and making it one of the top teams, complete teams, in baseball.  That was a huge hurdle from where he started and that has been a major success. Getting from a top MLB team to a successful playoff team may seem like a small jump but it is pretty large.  And Elias has been tentative at best at trying to make those changes.  He has taken an incremental path in hopes of maximizing his long term potential.  So far that really hasn't had much success.   But like Elias, we really should not assume that the changes needed to make that seemingly small jump from AL East contender to WS contender will not require some pretty big things.  I don't know if that is really different than what you are saying.  
    • It was never in hindsight. The Os were always against it. We had the numbers. We knew how bad it was going to effect the team.   That is why the MaSN deal was structured the way it was. It benefited the Os for a reason. That was essentially the compromise to having the team move to DC.
    • The Mets just had more exciting wins in one week than we had in four months.  I called us the Dull Orange Machine a few weeks ago for a reason.  Really boring team most of the season, with no personality at all.  They seemed to have a "get knocked down, stay down" mentality, which isn't fun to support as a fan.  There are a lot of very good reasons noted here as to why attendance wasn't great, but the energy around this team and the organization is just low and that can't help.  And a slow and boring offseason that doesn't move the needle much won't help attendance heading into next season either.  
    • This.  I grew up in Northern VA and it always took 1 hour to drive to Memorial or Camden no matter the time of day.  It was always easy to find parking as well.  Now that same drive takes 2-3 hours, and finding good parking is a pain.  Plus, the cost of parking, tickets, food/drinks, souvenirs has skyrocketed.  So the choice is to sit in traffic, fight for parking, pay tons of money for the hassle...or sit on my comfortable couch and watch the game on a huge HD screen for free...
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...