Jump to content

Are Baseballs "Juiced" This Season?


TonySoprano

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

Perhaps.  The league as a whole is hitting homers at an unprecedented rate.

Both Bundy and Straily have lead the league in Home Runs allowed in a previous season.  Hess gave up 22 home runs last year in a 100 innings.  Its not like anyone is close to giving up as many home runs as the Orioles. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, nate22 said:

I think that with the emphasis now on launch angles, Bundy might be better served working his fastball up in the strikezone. His fastball isn't good enough to work at the knees and might play up higher in the zone.

That's what Hess is explicitly trying to do.   One night it works and he pitches a no hitter.   Another night the outfield seats come under heavy fire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, atomic said:

Or maybe they have bad analytics that are telling them to throw the ball in the wrong place to the wrong hitter.  Or maybe the Orioles pitchers aren't very good.  Bundy sure gave up a lot of home runs last year. 

All of the above aside from juiced balls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

MLB finds itself in a tricky situation, kinda.  They need homers and big offense because they know that sells but they can't have PEDs because that's bad.  So...yeah, I'd assume that the balls have been juiced for awhile now.  

But jucing the ball leads to more walks and strikouts and fewer balls in play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Satyr3206 said:

My theory is that if you had a fewer pitchers that threw 95 the Homers would go down. The harder you throw the further it goes.

Calling the correct strike zone would help a bit too.

I think if you had fewer pitchers that threw 95 you would have less strikeouts and that would lead to more homeruns.

I'd like robo-umps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, atomic said:

Or it could be it is warmer this year.  The Orioles don't seem to be hitting a crazy amount of home runs. 

I would think you and others would be happy. For five or so years I’ve heard disappointment with over-reliance on the home run and fetishization of manufacturing runs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Satyr3206 said:

My theory is that if you had a fewer pitchers that threw 95 the Homers would go down. The harder you throw the further it goes.

Calling the correct strike zone would help a bit too.

I believe home runs have more to do with bat speed than pitch speed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • At this stage, I don't care how we get in - just get in. As been said on here a zillion times, the playoffs are a crap shoot. As bad as it seems right now - WHY NOT?
    • Oh, I forgot Mountcastle.  He had a 2.2 bWAR season going (1.4 oWAR). And he's effectively been replaced with O'Hearn who is a 1.3 bWAR player (which has been dropping) of which he has a -1.4 dWAR and a 1.8 oWAR. So there's a net negative there, too, going from O'Hearn part time to him FT and losing Mounty's bat. Injuries are a part of any given team, but I don't think it's unfair to say this team would be at 88-89 wins with even half of those guys back. 
    • While agree that taking this year's Santander out of the offense would hurt. This is the only year that he has performed at this level. He's OPS is 37 points higher this year, than his avg. His OBP stinks and he goes cold for fairly long periods. He's had a couple of heaters that have padded his OPS. His career OPS+ is 114 and that is buoyed by this years 132. I am not saying he sucks or is even at a replacement level player. But he is a pretty flawed player who is not likely to repeat this year which has been pretty flawed as well. I like Santander and I think he provides valuable leadership. I just don't see him having the value that it will take to keep him. I also don't think he is the type of player that ages well. 
    • You really should have to finish in first place to make the playoffs. If the divisions were large from back in the day then I could understand having 2nd place teams make it. It was such an accomplishment back then. We can all agree 3rd place teams making it is a joke. 
    • Agree 100%. I had a different thread chatting about The New Guys.  If we look at just the guys that are getting playing time because of injuries/trades/opportunities that are still playing on this team: Austin Slater: 0.4 (0.2 oWAR, 0.1 dWAR) Livan Soto: 0.3 (0.2, 0.1) Emmanuel Rivera: 0.1 (0.4, -0.3) Eloy Jimenez: -0.2 (-0.2, -0.2) Jackson Holliday: -0.3 (-0.1, 0) Coby Mayo: -0.7 (-0.5, -0.2) If we just go off of their oWAR, that's a combined 0.  Zero. Ramon Urias had a 1.6 oWAR this year. Jordan Westburg a 3.4 oWAR. Even Jorge Mateo had a 0.8 oWAR. Those 3 guys would be getting regular to semi-regular playing time. Eloy/Holliday/Mayo wouldn't play and their near -1.0 oWAR would be replaced with guys that had a combined 6 oWAR anywhere from months (Westy, Mateo) to weeks ago (Ramon).
    • You would think it would be closer to 74 with the way they are playing 
    • Elias said it the other day 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...