Jump to content

How Does AR Affect Sisco?


Bahama O's Fan

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply
3 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Sure, in 2033.

Sooner if his knees are not going to cut his prime years short. If he is as good as advertised, playing first lengthens his career. We've taken three catchers now in 10 rounds. I think it's likely Elias has such a plan for Rutschman. Of course, maybe not, but I'd rather see him at first before he turns 30. If that is the plan, it's a good one IMO. I don't care if first base isn't a premium position when he has a premium bat and having bad knees at 30 is going to hurt his bat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Sessh said:

Sooner if his knees are not going to cut his prime years short. If he is as good as advertised, playing first lengthens his career. We've taken three catchers now in 10 rounds. I think it's likely Elias has such a plan for Rutschman. Of course, maybe not, but I'd rather see him at first before he turns 30. If that is the plan, it's a good one IMO. I don't care if first base isn't a premium position when he has a premium bat and having bad knees at 30 is going to hurt his bat.

Why do you care about his bat at 30?  You got money on it he makes the HoF?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

Why do you care about his bat at 30?  You got money on it he makes the HoF?

No, but maybe wildcard does. Actually, I would just be very surprised if he wasn't a productive offensive player at the major league level and had a long career. Of course, if he's not all that great, then it's a moot point. I am surprised that we've taken three catchers so far and I was surprised that he also plays first base. It at least seems possible that the two are connected, but who knows? I'm just speculating because it's fun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Sessh said:

No, but maybe wildcard does. Actually, I would just be very surprised if he wasn't a productive offensive player at the major league level and had a long career. Of course, if he's not all that great, then it's a moot point. I am surprised that we've taken three catchers so far and I was surprised that he also plays first base. It at least seems possible that the two are connected, but who knows? I'm just speculating because it's fun.

I think you are reading way too much in the selection of the catchers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I think you are reading way too much in the selection of the catchers.

Maybe so. I don't think it's that much of a reach at all, though... at least theoretically. There's obviously numerous possible reasons for those selections of which I am only speculating on one that I find interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

I think Sisco needs to worry about establishing himself as a ML catcher.

He does that and he'll have a future somewhere.

This.

We also want Sisco to establish himself as a ML catcher prior to the 2021 season so he can be a valuable trade piece with years of control left.

Or, maybe both players are featured on the team.  Who knows?  First thing's first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BohKnowsBmore said:

While it’s reasonable to expect him to meet that threshold (that is, he better do that), it seems a bit odd that your starting assumption is that he’s not yet as good as those two. 

My assumption is he is much better than them.  But he has to prove he is to management as they are the ones who decide who stays on the team not me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, 25 Nuggets said:

This.

We also want Sisco to establish himself as a ML catcher prior to the 2021 season so he can be a valuable trade piece with years of control left.

Or, maybe both players are featured on the team.  Who knows?  First thing's first.

Yup, If Sisco was somehow an All-Star at catcher in 2020, Rutschman could still come up in early 2021 and one could DH while the other catches until Sisco is traded. You would likely carry a third catcher under this scenario, but that is feasible if they are both playing almost every day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sessh said:

Maybe so. I don't think it's that much of a reach at all, though... at least theoretically. There's obviously numerous possible reasons for those selections of which I am only speculating on one that I find interesting.

You draft the best player available and\or underslot college seniors (rounds 7-10) there's nothing more to it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I wouldn’t call that a “real strength”. Trade Perez and get a better arm to replace him.
    • But that RH bat played a position that we had locked down because of the presence of Urias and Westburg. He wasn’t going to come up and play. If you wanted him to be the RH DH, that’s fine but the Os also lost Mounty and Mayo didn’t come up and play well. They decided that having those 4 players was enough depth to use Norby to get pitching. I don’t see that as being wrong at all…no one to predict what would happen after. They had that “position” locked down. Jimenez was just a lottery ticket and really he played a lot more than they probably thought because of all the injuries that occurred.  
    • The 2025 bullpen looks like a real strength. R - Bautista, Cano, Dominguez, Webb L - Coloumbe, Soto, Perez, Akin I like having the 4 lefties with the WALL and that should be enough for the regular season.  It allows us to really matchup and take advantage of our ballpark. That’s a pen with 4 former All Stars. I believe Akin will still have an option since he made it through the season without burning his last one.  He’d be the guy to go down to AAA for a longman/fresh arm when needed. Maybe we get our lightning in a bottle reliever throwing near 100 in McDermott or Morfe later in the year. I don’t think we see much turnover here.  However, I could see Elias electing not to bring back Soto for flexibility reasons, more so than salary reasons.  Could we actually “sell” Soto for something of value?
    • https://www.masnsports.com/blog/reviewing-orioles-recent-coaching-history-and-thoughts-on-what-s-next From Roch.    An immediate reaction to the current openings is that Triple-A Norfolk manager Buck Britton could be a candidate to fill one of them. They also could seek a bilingual coach now that González and Hernández are gone. Britton’s contract expires at the end of the month and he’s close with the young hitters who passed through Norfolk. He’s also gained the respect of other teams in the majors and could move on, which would leave the Orioles with another task.   
    • If we don’t resign Burnes then what are we doing as a franchise?  It’s hard to see any difference between Rubenstei and what we had before. A case can be made for not bringing back Santander.  Heck, even Soto, but with our SP injuries, and the way we’ve spent our draft capital, the plan looked to be to always land that big time SP from outside the org.  Well that happened.  Gotta keep him now.
    • He called it a solid trade at the time it was made and he’ll die before he admits he was wrong about something. 
    • There was a need for a RH bat. We used a major league ready RH bat (who was also serviceable in the field) in the trade for Rogers. We added a bad RH bat, who was not able to play defense at all.  Neither Eloy or Rogers were able to keep their spot on the roster, and we had two guys go down that would have opened spots for Norby. So yes, it does have something to do with the Rogers trade.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...