Jump to content

Orioles trade Cashner to Red Sox


MurphDogg

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Huh?

90 games into the season he's at 96.1 innings, the option vests at 187 IP.  Why exactly would they have to "essentially bench the guy for the final month" to keep it from vesting?

For the record Cashner has never pitched 187 innings in a season.

IF he didn't miss a start for the rest of the season, he was on pace for 85 more innings (15 x 5.2).   So assuming he didn't reach the vesting option, the Orioles save all of $1.86M in this deal in 2019, maybe less with incentives reached?  The O's still owe him an additional $3M.   Those must be some nuggets they've acquired.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, awannabegeek said:

 

 

 

Bag of Balls, Nada, and Nothing are pretty synonymous with worthless.  Or am I missing something? Enlighten me.

In the absence of any information to the contrary, I am firmly of the opinion that we got nothing in return for our boy. If we’d gotten two 17- year old prospects and they’d pick up the salary, that would not be nothing. Better prospects and we pay a bunch of the salary, that would also not be nothing. However it appears that we have saved right around 1 million bucks, and we spent almost that much on Dan Straily.

so yes... In the absence of any information to the contrary I think nothing is an excellent way to describe this trade. However, as I pointed out to someone else, we can certainly talk in six years and review this trade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, LocoChris said:

Bad trade. I see people going the "well Cashner wasn't that good anyway" route on here but they're trying to convince themselves more than anything. Cashner was a decent pitcher who had a bad year last year but appears to have righted things this year. The trade would have been fine as a salary dump, but if the O's really are paying most of his salary, then the trade makes no sense at all.

Even if he is a decent pitcher, he is making $10M/year. He is a career 1 WAR pitcher who is having a good year but coming off a bad year. Considering the contract, he is not worth much more than the $4M+ or so they will be paying him.

I assume Elias did his due diligence, made teams aware Cashner was available, and took the best deal he could find. You can't say it's a bad trade unless you can prove there was an offer on the table that was passed up.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Aristotelian said:

Even if he is a decent pitcher, he is making $10M/year. He is a career 1 WAR pitcher who is having a good year but coming off a bad year. Considering the contract, he is not worth much more than the $4M+ or so they will be paying him.

I assume Elias did his due diligence, made teams aware Cashner was available, and took the best deal he could find. You can't say it's a bad trade unless you can prove there was an offer on the table that was passed up.

Some folks valued the stability that Cashner provided over a light return.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, LocoChris said:

Bad trade. I see people going the "well Cashner wasn't that good anyway" route on here but they're trying to convince themselves more than anything. Cashner was a decent pitcher who had a bad year last year but appears to have righted things this year. The trade would have been fine as a salary dump, but if the O's really are paying most of his salary, then the trade makes no sense at all.

This team has become a joke. I wish they would just move and we could replace them with an MLS team at this point.  

  • Downvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, atomic said:

For two 17 year olds?  Come on.  At a certain point Elias just need to be fired. 

Yes, this is the final straw. A fifth starter being traded for low level prospects. He has been the GM almost 8 months, we demand results!!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

8 minutes ago, MurphDogg said:

Yes, this is the final straw. A fifth starter being traded for low level prospects. He has been the GM almost 8 months, we demand results!!!!!!!!

He is not a fifth starter.  Look at we gave up for Norris and Feldman.  Cashner is better than them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, mdbdotcom said:

I'm assuming that all the top kids have advisers who keep them abreast of what the teams are doing. 

Why would they care about this trade?  The Oriole team was competitive in the DSL last season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Clearly he has a roster spot for a playoff series with the Yankees….
    • My stance would be pretty simple. Im not trading any of the top 3 prospects and im not trading any of the young talent that is controlled long term that is currently on the ML roster. That means besides the very obvious guys that players like Cowser and Kjerstad are also off the board. Now, if a player like Skubal becomes available, that could cause me to change my mind but as I look around at the reported available players, I don’t see anyone worth a top 20 prospect or young contributing ML talent. Guys like Norby and Stowers fall into that latter category but they aren’t here right now and they are just redundant on our roster. So I’m telling teams if you want to deal with us, guys like Norby, Stowers and Beavers are who will lead deals and that several vets, led by Mountcastle, are also on the board in any potential contender/contender(fringe contender) type deal. I think whether it’s Fedde or relievers like Estevez or Nardi or Garcia or even Scott, I think we have enough to get deals done without trading any of the guys we would rather not lose. This is all to say that I just don’t see that proven elite high end talent available this deadline to justify trading any of those top guys.
    • He’s an interesting test case. Prior to 2023, wasn’t good. In 2023, he threw around 200 innings iirc in the KBO and learned the sweeper. Now he is pitching much better. His statcast stats are pretty good although he’s not missing bats or getting Ks and he has a tendency to give up some hard contact.  
    • I don’t think he can be counted on for that. If you can get him cheap fine but his career WAR is 3.5 and he has 3.7 this year. Plus he’s 33 innings short of his career high …did 120-130 range twice. How could that be your acquisition that can be counted on when he could quite possibly run out of gas? Or get to a team where performance matters and feel the pressure versus pitching for the White Sox…A horrid team that everyone knew was going to suck.
    • Yea but how are you defining that?  Is Fedde a #3 or better, for example?
    • With all due respect … I think you are counting on Mayo to come up and immediately perform. I don’t think it’s realistic… possible yes. But, most guys have an adjustment. If it’s one thing we’ve seen from Hyde is the reluctance to give regular time to the rookies. Didn’t see it with Stowers, Norby, etc. They did  give it to Holliday but I think there was pressure being put on him to do so.  You think he would replace Urias who doesn’t play everyday with Mayo and sit the other guys to play him every day which is what a player needs during that adjustment period? 
    • Roch retweeted this. Lots of fans are speculating that it means Watkins is coming back to the Os. It makes some sense as we need fresh arms.  His numbers aren’t great this year but not sure that is going to matter.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...