Jump to content

Lowther and Wells on development tools in the minors this year

Frobby

By Frobby
in Orioles Talk

Recommended Posts

Frobby Hangout Grand Counsel

Frobby

Posted
Posted

Maybe this belongs in the minors section, but I think the methods used to develop our minor leaguers are of interest to readers on the main board.    Mods, feel free to move if appropriate.    

Zac Lowther and Alex Wells were at Camden Yards yesterday and gave interviews.    I thought this bit was interesting:

Both pitchers were asked to compare how they were developed and handled last year under the previous regime, and what has been different this season.

Lowther said: “I think just the development side. You get a lot more scouting. You get more scouting reports on the other guys. We are each looking to get better somewhere. Whether it’s development, whether it’s getting your routine down, figuring out who you are as a pitcher. A lot of little things. It’s not that we didn’t do them last year, but they are more pushed towards you.”

Said Wells: “There is a lot more data. We get to see more heat maps, more video. Before we face a team we go to the clubhouse and on video check out what the hitters’ tendencies are. See what they do in certain counts. Even after a start, we go in and look at video of ourselves to see what we want to work on for our next start.”

https://www.masnsports.com/steve-melewski/2019/08/on-bowie-off-night-baysox-pitchers-take-it-in-at-oriole-park.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lucky_13 Major Leaguer Rising Star

Lucky_13

Posted
Posted

This is all really encouraging and I'm surprised Elias and Co. were able to implement their development program as quickly as they have in just a year.  But it seems to be working, especially for the pitchers.  

I also really liked Lowther's interview on TV last night too.  He basically talked about how he really buys into the amount of data they give him out of necessity because he needs to get the most out of his arsenal without amazing velocity.  Hopefully guys with plus stuff have a similar attitude 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bobmc Hangout Grand Counsel

bobmc

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Maybe this belongs in the minors section, but I think the methods used to develop our minor leaguers are of interest to readers on the main board.    Mods, feel free to move if appropriate.    

Zac Lowther and Alex Wells were at Camden Yards yesterday and gave interviews.    I thought this bit was interesting:

 

 

It was an interesting give and take and all the while the Jays were hitting bombs to all parts of the field.  Lowther, very astute as was Wells,  when asked if he liked the opportunity the O's will provide said, "Yes, but when we get here we want to stay so we need to do all that's necessary to help to assure that."  (I paraphrased and he basically said that he wasn't ready to rush the process.)  Elias seems to be doing just that with his prospects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
glenn__davis Hangout Grand Counsel

glenn__davis

Posted
Posted

Wonder how much of this is due to changed regimes, and how much is just the standard jump from A to AA.  I've read many times that AA is the first spot where scouting reports and those types of pre-game discussions really come in to play, so some of this could just be standard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
25 Nuggets Hangout Grand Counsel

25 Nuggets

Posted
Posted

I've said for, Idunno, 15 years that development was a bigger issue than talent, when it came to the Orioles inability to produce quality pitchers, especially starters.  Well I can't quite say I'm vindicated yet because these young pitchers have not played at the major league level, much less succeeded at it.  But the signs are encouraging.  I'm so glad to hear Elias' plan is working so quickly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LookinUp Hangout Grand Counsel

LookinUp

Posted
Posted

I think we have to think beyond stage 1 to realize just how this approach helps with player development. All they said was we scout other teams better. What's next?

1. They're much better informed about how to see hitter tendencies and attack weaknesses.
2. They pitch much more to the available strengths (e.g., away from hitter strengths).
3. To the extent weaknesses of hitters don't align with strengths of pitchers, they need to know that and work on how to attack those weaknesses.

I really think what comes across as a throwaway line about better scouting is key to better preparing our pitchers to face all types of hitters. It's so much smarter than an "aim for the corners" philosophy.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ruzious Hangout Grand Counsel

Ruzious

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, glenn__davis said:

Wonder how much of this is due to changed regimes, and how much is just the standard jump from A to AA.  I've read many times that AA is the first spot where scouting reports and those types of pre-game discussions really come in to play, so some of this could just be standard.

Yup, that was my first reaction.  Question would be - are they doing these same kinds of things now at Frederick?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing


  • Posts

    • Pickles
      Elias: It's on me

      By Pickles · Posted

      I'll be honest, the playoffs didn't put me in a happy mood and reading this board has only made it worse.  The amount of people, many well respected, with over the top, outrageous takes calling guys "losers" and "chokers" etc. is ridiculous imo.  This reads more like a football board than a baseball board, and that's not a compliment. I'm kind of at a loss for what they should do to be honest.  The 2nd half drop-off imo is mostly explained by the injuries, particularly on the mound, and Adley's inexplicable performance.  If they were to run the team back with some minimal upgrades to the rotation and pen, sans Burnes and Santander, I think that's a team that could/should win 95ish games and compete for the division.  But there's downside there too.  And if you get Adley of the 2nd half, then you might be looking more at 85ish wins and missing the playoffs. However, I see a lot of schizophrenic and illogical takes on the board.  A lot of people are calling for a "veteran hitter" for the lineup; many of those same people are all too happy to let Santander walk.  Some are calling to not just "hand jobs to young guys;" many of these people were the loudest in demanding more aggressive promoting of prospects. I'm just generally down on the tenor of the board, and personally, I don't have any crazy strong feelings about what I think the O's should or should not do, which is fairly unusual for me.
    • Warehouse
      Who will pay Burnes $400M this offseason?

      By Warehouse · Posted

      The Phillies are profitable.  The Mets and the Padres are the only two teams that have really done aggressive “deficit-spending” in pursuit of a ring in the last few years.
    • Too Tall
      Who will pay Burnes $400M this offseason?

      By Too Tall · Posted

      If someone pays Burnes 400 mil or anything close. I think there are owners out there that haven't learned anything and have more money that brains. Don't get me wrong - Burnes is a good pitcher but that's it he is a good pitcher that will turn 30 next year. I believe the calculus for paying 30ish starting pitchers of value is changing. I believe - regardless of Boras - shorter terms and higher average annuals will be in play. So to me, 4/120 isn't a stupid prediction. Guess we shall see. 
    • Bemorewins
      Who will pay Burnes $400M this offseason?

      By Bemorewins · Posted

      There is NOTHING preventing the Orioles of signing any player to a serious contract. Especially considering we have signed ZERO since Chris Davis way back in what 2015? That was almost a decade ago. We have been operating in a non-serious manner for too long when it comes to the org’s on field investment.  Teams that don’t spend don’t win World Series. Look at the last 20 years of the game. The Astros first World Series is the only team who wasn’t too half of the league who won a championship.
    • Bemorewins
      Who will pay Burnes $400M this offseason?

      By Bemorewins · Posted

      Some owners spend and want to win (Mets, Padres, Phillies). Some are more interested in making money (Rays, Guardians, etc). If Rubenstein is a profits based owner (has to make money year after year like JA) vs an investment style o lever (accepts some years May come with a loss or small net gain) then we (the fans) will be screwed. We will be akin to the Rays who are content with being “good”. But they are never willing to do what it takes to be good enough. I hope Rubenstein and everyone associated with the business or the Orioles paid a lot of attention to all of the empty seats for playoff games. That is evidence of a fanbase/market place who is not fully engaged.  The onus is on the Orioles to give people a compelling reason to come out and spend money especially in this economy. And it cannot just be hey look we have a winning team. The franchise must do more including investing in the on field product (in terms of committed dollars like every other serious franchise who is trying to win a championship).
    • Hallas
      Who will pay Burnes $400M this offseason?

      By Hallas · Posted

      My recollection is that MLB has rules about how much debt teams are allowed to take on and how much money owners are allowed to infuse into their franchises.   They supposedly won't approve contracts if they think a contract will cause them to exceed these thresholds.
    • bobmc
      Walltimore

      By bobmc · Posted

      Yeah like Tony T but Tony has the ability to foul pitches at will.  I want Cowser to be more like @waroriole’s Rob Refsnyder and Holliday to be Steven Kwan.  Is that too much to ask of number one picks?  But I love Cowser and most of everything he brings. 

  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...