Jump to content

Jose Iglesias?


wildcard

Recommended Posts

Elias wants a veteran defensive shortstop.    Iglesias  is a a free agent.  He turns 30 in January.   He made 2.5m last year after making 6.2m in 2018.      Here is what one report out of Cincinnati says about him.

Quote

 

The Cincinnati Reds shortstop has poor plate discipline, but plays phenomenal defense.

While we can sit back all day and debate Iglesias’ value as a hitter, there’s no denying the elite-level defense that he plays. The type of defensive wizardry we’ve seen from José Iglesias this season has not been on display in Cincinnati since Brandon Phillipswas in his prime. Iglesias makes difficult plays look easy and adds style and flair to the mundane.

By the numbers, Iglesias’ nine Total Defensive Runs Saved (DRS) is the best of his career.

 

https://blogredmachine.com/2019/09/14/cincinnati-reds-defense-alone-warrant-contract-jose-iglesias/

Not a great hitter.  HIs career numbers are 273/315/371/687.  

https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/i/iglesjo01.shtml

If his contract this off season is 2.5m-3M I can see Elias trying to sign him.  If its a lot higher I doubt he becomes a Orioles.

What is your take?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've wanted us to obtain Iglesias for several years and now is the time to sign him. Our pitching will improve this season and an excellent SS will help all of our pitchers. $3-4 million should be enough to get him under contract. Personally I though Martin was overrated defensively. I think I saw every one of his errors or bobbled balls last season. He probably is rated better than he plays when I've seen him  because everyone it seems raves about his defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Aristotelian said:

I doubt he takes a one year contract and that's all I would want him for. 

Why?  Not that I particularly want him, but if Elias did, there is nobody waiting  to take over at short in 2021 either is there?  We have few, if any,  shortstops waiting in our system ready in 2021.  Adam Hall?  doubt it myself.  Gunnar Henderson probably will not even stay at short and I doubt he is here in 2021 anyway.   So, if I wanted him, having him on two year deal would not be an obstacle, imho.  Our pitching is going to be arriving sooner than a shortstop from our system and if it helps our young guys... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, tntoriole said:

Why?  Not that I particularly want him, but if Elias did, there is nobody waiting  to take over at short in 2021 either is there?  We have few, if any,  shortstops waiting in our system ready in 2021.  Adam Hall?  doubt it myself.  Gunnar Henderson probably will not even stay at short and I doubt he is here in 2021 anyway.   So, if I wanted him, having him on two year deal would not be an obstacle, imho.  Our pitching is going to be arriving sooner than a shortstop from our system and if it helps our young guys... 

Let's see who we get back from Villar, Mancini, and Bundy. If we are at all competitive in 2021, maybe we sign someone better than Iglesias. The more years you lock up, the less flexibility you have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Also, I would rather extend Villar than sign Iglesias for a multiyear deal.

That would cost more.  And Iglesias is a better defender.  If indeed Elias has said that he would like to sign veteran shortstop then that is not Villar, clearly.  And I am still not sure that ME doesn’t nontender Villar.  We shall see. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Aristotelian said:

Also, I would rather extend Villar than sign Iglesias for a multiyear deal.

I am philosophically opposed to extensions, but I definitely don’t want to extend someone with as many problems as Villar. I hope we sign him and then trade him rather than nontender him, but Elias’ interview sure made it seem like a non-tender was being seriously considered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • ZiPS being an inhuman thing incapable of recency bias is not much out on Holliday.    It only dings his 2025-2029 forecast WAR by about 3% today relative to what it was forecasting this spring. https://blogs.fangraphs.com/reassessing-the-future-for-this-seasons-disappointing-rookies/ Jackson Holliday’s numbers didn’t take a big hit for a few reasons. First, and most importantly, despite a really lousy debut in the majors, he played well enough in the minors — plus he’s so young and his résumé is so strong — that his small-sample struggles barely register. By reverse-o-fying Holliday’s major league woes into an untranslated minor league line and including it in his overall Triple-A production, ZiPS estimates that he would’ve had a 118 wRC+ in Triple-A this season, down from his actual mark of 142. A 20-year-old shortstop with a 118 wRC+ in Triple-A would still top everybody’s prospect list.
    • Kjerstad should also get some reps in at first so he can be an option there as well, although now is probably not the time, best for him to DH for the rest of the season. He had 8 starts at first at AAA this season and 37 starts there between AA and AAA in 2023.
    • In Grich’s case, I think his OBP skills weren’t appreciated at the time.  He was a .266 lifetime hitter in an era when that was maybe 10 points above average, but his .371 OBP was more like 45-50 points above average.  But OBP just wasn’t very valued at the time.  
    • We don’t have a current combo that is ideal. You have to go with the best possible grouping you have.
    • Yep, we're in agreement on the 70 rWAR threshold.  A championship would help Manny's cause, though I'm not sure if that's in the cards for him in the near future.  He needs a big moment on a big stage, too....as silly as that sounds, I do believe it matters in the eyes of some voters. Not to derail, but Whitaker is a guy that belongs in the HoF, too.  I'm not sure why Grich never got serious consideration.
    • I’ve always felt that 70 rWAR was the line between having to justify why someone shouldn’t be in the HOF versus justifying why they should.  In other words, if you’re over 70, there needs to be a reason for you NOT to be in.  There are 70 position players over 70 WAR, and the only ones not in are Bonds, Pujols (not yet eligible), Trout (not yet eligible), Rose, Bill Dahlen, Lou Whitaker, Raffy Palmeiro, Bobby Grich, and Carlos Beltran.  Really, only Dahlen, Whitaker and Grich have no obvious reason why they’re not in.  And I wouldn’t bet against Beltran getting in eventually.  He’s gotten  46% and 57% of the ballots his first two tries.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...