Jump to content

Official Rules Announcement


SteveA

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, George Zuverink said:

God, I hadn't thought about playing games with an "invisible" runner in 60 years. Thanks for the memories!?

So can the all-time pitcher force a ghostman out at third if he gets there before the runner gets to first and there were ghostmen at first and second? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DrungoHazewood said:

So can the all-time pitcher force a ghostman out at third if he gets there before the runner gets to first and there were ghostmen at first and second? 

That would be the standard interpretation of the rule, yes.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

So can the all-time pitcher force a ghostman out at third if he gets there before the runner gets to first and there were ghostmen at first and second? 

If you have an all time pitcher, Standard rules have pitchers mound poison so the pitcher only has to be on the rubber. 

You know today's kids would have no idea what we are talking about. Honestly other than the way girls dress it would suck to be a kid today, imo. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Flosman said:

If you have an all time pitcher, Standard rules have pitchers mound poison so the pitcher only has to be on the rubber. 

You know today's kids would have no idea what we are talking about. Honestly other than the way girls dress it would suck to be a kid today, imo. 

Ah, yes, pitcher's poison.  My kids know what that is, and ghost men.  But only because about twice a year we play ball in the front yard.

Being a kid is exactly what it's always been: you grow up and stuff happens and for most of that time you assume whatever is happening to you is pretty normal. It's as true today as it was when you'd send your eight-year-old to go work in the textile factory 60 hours a week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How much longer until we get a schedule.  They said shorty over a week ago yet still nothing.  I figured it would be early this week with holiday weekend if we don’t get it tomorrow I would think we don’t hear anything over the holiday weekend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • This is the right approach. the orioles should be spending more money and I believe they will, but I expect it to be measured with less risk (ie we won’t be handing out a Hader type deal or a  long term contract to Santander IMO) improving on some of the obvious weaknesses certainly makes sense.    1x SP: Burnes, Fried, Buehler 1x RH OF/DH: Martinez, O’Neill, Profar 1x 1B: (wishlist) Alonso, Walker
    • Interesting. I had forgotten that they signed him and then got him in the pitching lab in the offseason. Since September is prior to the end of the season, I would take "two year contract" to mean September '23 is Year 1, and then '24 is Year 2.  That is a cool article. Very encouraging how closely they are following the KBO. 
    • I think most teams would want to have an MVP candidate at quarterback.   Most of the time this will mean that he is better than the guy they currently have.  That's why. My quote was not taking salary into account.  If you take his current salary into account I think you are still talking about a majority of the NFL teams that would take him right now.  If the salary is an issue you find a way to make it work.  I'm starting to come around to the idea that the salary cap is kinda fake in a way after I keep seeing teams do stuff like adding void years other trickery to get the guys they want.
    • Well I sort of disagree here. You said guys have been bad to questionable. I think that’s wrong. I just think a few guys have been awful and that has really hurt us. I would absolutely give Washington more time. Brade and Kane are well liked but doubtful they want to play them much right now. A trade should be considered if things don’t improve.
    • Yeah, I'd rather keep him over Soto.  I mean Soto can't start.  Yes Soto was dominant at times out of the bullpen but he was also gasoline on a fire out of the bullpen.  I would rather pay Suarez $4 or 5 million, knowing he can start or pitch in the bullpen than Soto, knowing he can only start and is liable to melt down when needed most.  
    • It is funny how much Hays (the pre-2024 version anyway) matches the type of player they'll likely look for. I doubt that reunion happens though. 
    • Weird thing about Suarez is that MASN had this being a 2 year deal when they talked about him back in April. ”The Orioles made another smart move with Suárez by signing him to a two-year contract in September. They knew what they’d ask from him and how it could contradict, and they didn’t want to give him any reasons to resist.” https://www.masnsports.com/blog/another-look-at-how-suarez-came-to-the-orioles
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...