Jump to content

Minor League Season Officially Cancelled


weams

Recommended Posts

I asked this question in another thread, but it will make more sense in this one now.

If this is true and the MiLB season is cancelled, what does that do to our 30 and 60 man rosters for the MLB season? Do we decided to let guys like Rutchman, Mountcastle, and the other top prospects play? ST workouts and intersquad reps won't give them the experience they need to get better. These guys need to play. 

My biggest fear, obviously from a pure baseball perspective, with the pandemic was how this was going to affect our player development. I think the guys at the very top of our talent pool could tread water in MLB without it being a detriment to their development. This is far from ideal, but I think putting those guys on the shelf for a year is worse. 

Someone on here much smarter than me will know what we should do. I'll take my answer off air.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Sanfran327 said:

I asked this question in another thread, but it will make more sense in this one now.

If this is true and the MiLB season is cancelled, what does that do to our 30 and 60 man rosters for the MLB season? Do we decided to let guys like Rutchman, Mountcastle, and the other top prospects play? ST workouts and intersquad reps won't give them the experience they need to get better. These guys need to play. 

My biggest fear, obviously from a pure baseball perspective, with the pandemic was how this was going to affect our player development. I think the guys at the very top of our talent pool could tread water in MLB without it being a detriment to their development. This is far from ideal, but I think putting those guys on the shelf for a year is worse. 

Someone on here much smarter than me will know what we should do. I'll take my answer off air.

A lot of the people who think in a similar way to Elias and Mejdal believe that you can accomplish just as much training the players without minor league games.  I guess we will find out.  Might not hurt the young guys to hit live pitching that has played AAA or pitched a little in the majors even it is isn't a "real" game.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, VaBird1 said:

A lot of the people who think in a similar way to Elias and Mejdal believe that you can accomplish just as much training the players without minor league games.  I guess we will find out.  Might not hurt the young guys to hit live pitching that has played AAA or pitched a little in the majors even it is isn't a "real" game.

So the AAA or AAAA guys are the ones that get the most screwed here. Because they can help train and stretch the lower-level guys, but who pushes them? Hopefully there is a plan to do right by some of these guys when we're in a no-win season. Then again, nobody owes them any favors, and pro sports is a meritocracy. 

Any speculation what we would do with our minor leaguers without a MiLB season? Would we just have mixed rosters competing against each other over and over? That's certainly better than intersquad, but not much. And limits exposure by a significant amount. It will be interesting to see what happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sanfran327 said:

I asked this question in another thread, but it will make more sense in this one now.

If this is true and the MiLB season is cancelled, what does that do to our 30 and 60 man rosters for the MLB season? Do we decided to let guys like Rutchman, Mountcastle, and the other top prospects play? ST workouts and intersquad reps won't give them the experience they need to get better. These guys need to play. 

My biggest fear, obviously from a pure baseball perspective, with the pandemic was how this was going to affect our player development. I think the guys at the very top of our talent pool could tread water in MLB without it being a detriment to their development. This is far from ideal, but I think putting those guys on the shelf for a year is worse. 

Someone on here much smarter than me will know what we should do. I'll take my answer off air.

Much better than sitting at home on their butts...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Philip said:

This makes me sad. But more than that, how can you cancel the minor-league season and not cancel major league season as well? They’re both baseball games, There’s not enough difference between the two to justify continuing one while you stop the other.

MLB gets maybe half of their revenue from gameday sources.  Something like that.  Each team gets over $100M from TV, radio, MLBAM, etc.  Some well over that.

I'm guessing that MiLB gets 90% of their revenue from gameday sources.  Teams like the Tides or Baysox might have little low-power AM stations broadcast their games, and I guess a few dollars from streaming games, but rounding off, if there's no crowd there's no money.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

MLB gets maybe half of their revenue from gameday sources.  Something like that.  Each team gets over $100M from TV, radio, MLBAM, etc.  Some well over that.

I'm guessing that MiLB gets 90% of their revenue from gameday sources.  Teams like the Tides or Baysox might have little low-power AM stations broadcast their games, and I guess a few dollars from streaming games, but rounding off, if there's no crowd there's no money.

Sounds like you’re saying that because money is to be made, we will play. If money is not to be made, then we won’t play. So safety has little or nothing to do with it.

And yes I know, I should not be surprised…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Philip said:

Sounds like you’re saying that because money is to be made, we will play. If money is not to be made, then we won’t play. So safety has little or nothing to do with it.

And yes I know, I should not be surprised…

The Bundesliga and all kinds of other European soccer leagues have been playing for a month with no major issues.  I don't see how baseball is going to be that different, although the US has different rates of infection in different areas.  I don't think safety is a huge concern, and they'll stop if it starts to be.

And of course money is a huge factor.  Why wouldn't it be?  Baseball is a business, it exists to make money.  This isn't a pickup game at the local park.  MLB is a $10B corporation.  Are you saying you prefer that all of the employees of the Orioles just don't get paid?  I would love for there to be a MiLB season, there's just no point if playing games costs everyone money.  Without paying fans every minor league game is a net loss.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Enjoy Terror said:

If safety had anything to do with it, people would be inside wearing a mask and not playing baseball with each other.

Like everything else it's a balance between safety and people making a living.  If MLB can make some money and pay some salaries (not just players) through media contracts while being a relatively low risk to the players, why shouldn't they?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Philip said:

This makes me sad. But more than that, how can you cancel the minor-league season and not cancel major league season as well? They’re both baseball games, There’s not enough difference between the two to justify continuing one while you stop the other.

 

Minor League Baseball also has about 4 times as many teams and are more spread out, plus the players generally live with host families. There is a higher risk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Philip said:

Sounds like you’re saying that because money is to be made, we will play. If money is not to be made, then we won’t play. So safety has little or nothing to do with it.

And yes I know, I should not be surprised…

Not true.    More money being made off the games means more money to spend on safety measures.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

Not true.    More money being made off the games means more money to spend on safety measures.   

Call me skeptical. I think more money being made off the greens means more money being made off the games. The owners will spend as little as they possibly can.

As I get older I understand more and more why Jesus was so frustrated.

Edited by Philip
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • This is the right approach. the orioles should be spending more money and I believe they will, but I expect it to be measured with less risk (ie we won’t be handing out a Hader type deal or a  long term contract to Santander IMO) improving on some of the obvious weaknesses certainly makes sense.    1x SP: Burnes, Fried, Buehler 1x RH OF/DH: Martinez, O’Neill, Profar 1x 1B: (wishlist) Alonso, Walker
    • Interesting. I had forgotten that they signed him and then got him in the pitching lab in the offseason. Since September is prior to the end of the season, I would take "two year contract" to mean September '23 is Year 1, and then '24 is Year 2.  That is a cool article. Very encouraging how closely they are following the KBO. 
    • I think most teams would want to have an MVP candidate at quarterback.   Most of the time this will mean that he is better than the guy they currently have.  That's why. My quote was not taking salary into account.  If you take his current salary into account I think you are still talking about a majority of the NFL teams that would take him right now.  If the salary is an issue you find a way to make it work.  I'm starting to come around to the idea that the salary cap is kinda fake in a way after I keep seeing teams do stuff like adding void years other trickery to get the guys they want.
    • Well I sort of disagree here. You said guys have been bad to questionable. I think that’s wrong. I just think a few guys have been awful and that has really hurt us. I would absolutely give Washington more time. Brade and Kane are well liked but doubtful they want to play them much right now. A trade should be considered if things don’t improve.
    • Yeah, I'd rather keep him over Soto.  I mean Soto can't start.  Yes Soto was dominant at times out of the bullpen but he was also gasoline on a fire out of the bullpen.  I would rather pay Suarez $4 or 5 million, knowing he can start or pitch in the bullpen than Soto, knowing he can only start and is liable to melt down when needed most.  
    • It is funny how much Hays (the pre-2024 version anyway) matches the type of player they'll likely look for. I doubt that reunion happens though. 
    • Weird thing about Suarez is that MASN had this being a 2 year deal when they talked about him back in April. ”The Orioles made another smart move with Suárez by signing him to a two-year contract in September. They knew what they’d ask from him and how it could contradict, and they didn’t want to give him any reasons to resist.” https://www.masnsports.com/blog/another-look-at-how-suarez-came-to-the-orioles
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...