Jump to content

Tracking Ex Oriole Thread


Rene88

Recommended Posts

29 minutes ago, TommyPickles said:

Benefitting from more regular play time?

Much easier division?

Maybe, as I have said, the rule 5 draft is not good for the players. Hiding guys on a roster and not allowing them to compete on a regular basis hurts their development.

I heard and thought we should sign him, shocked we didn’t but he wouldn’t be getting that playing time here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/19/2018 at 1:20 PM, DrungoHazewood said:

Prior to this year Ryan Flaherty had appeared in six major league seasons.  His batting average every single year was between .202 and .224.  His OBP was between .258 and .302.  His slugging .318 to .390, except last year when it was .237.  He's a very consistent player.  He just can't hit.

If he becomes a serviceable everyday player at 31 it'll be frankly amazing.

 

1 hour ago, Natty said:

Couldn't help but notice Flaherty is leading the NL in batting, .362. 

Whatever, Drungo. 

Flaherty has the most improbably season ever, slashing .362/.490/.550. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very curious to see how his numbers do once he gets closer to 200 PA.   Over his entire career it seems like he's averaged around 250 or so per season..........last year's numbers should probably just be totally ignored (only 43 PA).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our old friend Luis Hernandez retired today. I know you're shocked.

 

In 2008 the Orioles trotted out five different shortstops: Alex Cintron, Freddie Bynum, Brandon Fahey, Juan Castro, and "Little Luis". They combined for 635 plate appearances in the infield, amassing a WAR of ... **drumroll**... -5.0.

That has to be the worst combined performance at (mostly) a single position in history.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, TommyPickles said:

 

Is he benefitting from more regular play time ???

And/or a much easier division ???

 

 

 

12 minutes ago, OFFNY said:

o

 

Both could be true ........ or at least one of the two.

 

o

o

 

Or a third possibility .......

 

Flaherty's super-hot start reminds me to a certain extent of what happened with Billy Smith in 1977.

For the first month-and-a-half of the 1977 season, I remember being very excited about Billy Smith being at or near the top of the league in batting average. That spring was the first time that I had ever heard of him, and I would brag to my brother Mark (Yankee fan) about him (and also eventually about Ken Singleton and Al Bumbry when they both went to the top 3 in the league in batting average as the season wore on.) In the pre-Internet, Pre-Cable TV days, I would excitedly wait for my mom to get home with the NY Daily News every Sunday when the league stats for all of the regular position players and pitchers were posted on a weekly basis, so I could read how Smith was doing.

 

As the marathon 162 game season wore on, Smith's batting average progressively dropped. By the time that the season ended, he had batted .215 in 411 Plate Appearances.

 

https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/gl.fcgi?id=smithbi05&t=b&year=1977

 

I'm not necessarily saying that the same will happen with Flaherty this year, but I do see some similarities in the two situations.

 

 

llImage result for Billy Smith Oriolesllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllf0f73a87_mlbam.jpglll 

 

o

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope that his nevitable return to earth occurs sooner rather than later and I will be looking forward to seeing the reaction of the naysayers who are on here saying what a good player Flaherty was, how we should have signed him, how we mishandled him by not giving him "regular" playing time, blah, blah, blah.   2014, he started the season and played every day for the first 25 games...and hit .192.   Yippee.    I don't know what games you all were watching, but watching Ryan Flaherty try to hit for years was excruciatingly painful.  

Ryan Flaherty is what he is.   A useful backup who is offensively challenged.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, tntoriole said:

I hope that his nevitable return to earth occurs sooner rather than later and I will be looking forward to seeing the reaction of the naysayers who are on here saying what a good player Flaherty was, how we should have signed him, how we mishandled him by not giving him "regular" playing time, blah, blah, blah.   2014, he started the season and played every day for the first 25 games...and hit .192.   Yippee.    I don't know what games you all were watching, but watching Ryan Flaherty try to hit for years was excruciatingly painful.  

Ryan Flaherty is what he is.   A useful backup who is offensively challenged.    

Big Jim Thome said he was a powah hittah.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • At this stage, I don't care how we get in - just get in. As been said on here a zillion times, the playoffs are a crap shoot. As bad as it seems right now - WHY NOT?
    • Oh, I forgot Mountcastle.  He had a 2.2 bWAR season going (1.4 oWAR). And he's effectively been replaced with O'Hearn who is a 1.3 bWAR player (which has been dropping) of which he has a -1.4 dWAR and a 1.8 oWAR. So there's a net negative there, too, going from O'Hearn part time to him FT and losing Mounty's bat. Injuries are a part of any given team, but I don't think it's unfair to say this team would be at 88-89 wins with even half of those guys back. 
    • While agree that taking this year's Santander out of the offense would hurt. This is the only year that he has performed at this level. He's OPS is 37 points higher this year, than his avg. His OBP stinks and he goes cold for fairly long periods. He's had a couple of heaters that have padded his OPS. His career OPS+ is 114 and that is buoyed by this years 132. I am not saying he sucks or is even at a replacement level player. But he is a pretty flawed player who is not likely to repeat this year which has been pretty flawed as well. I like Santander and I think he provides valuable leadership. I just don't see him having the value that it will take to keep him. I also don't think he is the type of player that ages well. 
    • You really should have to finish in first place to make the playoffs. If the divisions were large from back in the day then I could understand having 2nd place teams make it. It was such an accomplishment back then. We can all agree 3rd place teams making it is a joke. 
    • Agree 100%. I had a different thread chatting about The New Guys.  If we look at just the guys that are getting playing time because of injuries/trades/opportunities that are still playing on this team: Austin Slater: 0.4 (0.2 oWAR, 0.1 dWAR) Livan Soto: 0.3 (0.2, 0.1) Emmanuel Rivera: 0.1 (0.4, -0.3) Eloy Jimenez: -0.2 (-0.2, -0.2) Jackson Holliday: -0.3 (-0.1, 0) Coby Mayo: -0.7 (-0.5, -0.2) If we just go off of their oWAR, that's a combined 0.  Zero. Ramon Urias had a 1.6 oWAR this year. Jordan Westburg a 3.4 oWAR. Even Jorge Mateo had a 0.8 oWAR. Those 3 guys would be getting regular to semi-regular playing time. Eloy/Holliday/Mayo wouldn't play and their near -1.0 oWAR would be replaced with guys that had a combined 6 oWAR anywhere from months (Westy, Mateo) to weeks ago (Ramon).
    • You would think it would be closer to 74 with the way they are playing 
    • Elias said it the other day 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...