Jump to content

State of the System: Middle Infield - Grade C+


ScGO's

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, hoosiers said:

Have to love an analysis that says Elias should "address this through the draft" when he just spent the 30th overall pick in the 2020 draft on an SEC shortstop.  There is much more minor league talent in the system at SS/2B than in the OF - frankly, IMO, it's not close.

We do not have major league long term solutions at these positions and that is where the middle infield should be down-graded, but we have plenty of good drafted talent there in the minors.

I think part of the issue is that the ones that we have seen play in the minors are not a lock to stay at short.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, hoosiers said:

Have to love an analysis that says Elias should "address this through the draft" when he just spent the 30th overall pick in the 2020 draft on an SEC shortstop.  There is much more minor league talent in the system at SS/2B than in the OF - frankly, IMO, it's not close.

We do not have major league long term solutions at these positions and that is where the middle infield should be down-graded, but we have plenty of good drafted talent there in the minors.

More talent in the MI vs OF?  Interesting thought.

Kjerstad has the highest ceiling of any of the players imo.  The only one close to Gunnar and he likely (although not definitely) will end up at third.

I would put the upside of Diaz ahead of all except Gunnar (again if he stays) and maybe Westburg, assuming he stays at SS. We don’t really know what we have in Westburg yet.  If he continues how he played in the SEC, he will be lucky to get past AA.  He may be he biggest wild card in our organization, outside of any of the young Intl guys that could develop.  

I do agree that once you get past Kjerstad and Diaz, that the MI talent depth is better.  The only player beyond those 2 that I think is “exciting” is Haskin and he has a ways to go in his development.  Like Westburg, he is a big wild card who perhaps would have gone much higher if they played a college season this year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Westburg was taken 30th overall - that's end of the first round.  Westburg, Gunnar, Hall - all early picks, plus Servideo, Hernaiz, Ortiz, Vavra and then a lower tier of McCoy, Bannon and others like Grenier.

Considering the OF represents three positions and the middle infield two, I think our prospect coverage in the middle infield - even if you push Gunnar to 3B - is superior to the OF.

Again, here like other positions, if we add a normal representation of international prospects in a couple of years, our quality and depth in the middle infield becomes a strength.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the grade is generous. I liked Hernaiz before Covid. Westburg and Vavra are nice additions, but don't exactly profile as first division starters. This is a part of the organization that basically profiles as "could have some talent, but nothing special is apparent yet." That's a C- at best for me, and that's if you like Vavra, Westburg and Hernaiz beyond what their production has shown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/4/2020 at 5:24 PM, hoosiers said:

Have to love an analysis that says Elias should "address this through the draft" when he just spent the 30th overall pick in the 2020 draft on an SEC shortstop.  There is much more minor league talent in the system at SS/2B than in the OF - frankly, IMO, it's not close.

We do not have major league long term solutions at these positions and that is where the middle infield should be down-graded, but we have plenty of good drafted talent there in the minors.

He's definitely taken quite a few SS who may have to move to 3B/2B in the last two drafts. Gunnar Henderson, Joseph Ortiz, and Darell Hernaiz in 2019. Then Westburg and Servideo in 2020.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/5/2020 at 10:14 PM, BohKnowsBmore said:

He's definitely taken quite a few SS who may have to move to 3B/2B in the last two drafts. Gunnar Henderson, Joseph Ortiz, and Darell Hernaiz in 2019. Then Westburg and Servideo in 2020.

Why do any of them need to move?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/3/2020 at 8:45 PM, wildcard said:

He is equal to or better than Alberto at 2nd defensively and he is a better hitter.  Better power.  791 OPS deserves more opportunity.  And Valaika will be cheaper than Alberto.   Alberto has has two seasons to show he can hit righties and has not.  Time to give someone else a chance.  Valaika is next in line.

I'm sure I've pointed this out six or eight times, but Alberto and Valaika are the same age and Alberto has an 81 OPS+, Valaika a 72.  The only way you can peg Valaika as definitively a better hitter is if you ignore everything before 2020, when Valaika had an unacceptable .656 OPS in Colorado.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/5/2020 at 2:07 PM, LookinUp said:

I think the grade is generous. I liked Hernaiz before Covid. Westburg and Vavra are nice additions, but don't exactly profile as first division starters. This is a part of the organization that basically profiles as "could have some talent, but nothing special is apparent yet." That's a C- at best for me, and that's if you like Vavra, Westburg and Hernaiz beyond what their production has shown.

I think this entire series is based on ceiling without any real thought given to likelihood of reaching that ceiling.  So an average team at an average position will be something like a B or B+.  But even on that scale giving the Orioles a C+ here is pretty generous since no one in the organization is terribly likely to be playing middle infield for the Orioles in the majors in three years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Middle infield defense feels like one of those aspects of the game where the deltas between what is and isn't behind the curtain are bigger.

It'll be magnificent if Henderson develops as a solid or plus SS two-way player, and I imagine the coaches will have a lot to do with it.  Bobby Dickerson got a shoutout on last night's Padres-Dodgers telecast for tightening Tatis's screws as it was also recollected that he was Manny's infield guy back in the day.

My memory is the knock on Nolan Arenado coming up was that he was a bad 3B and well, here we are.

My armchair guess is Servideo is the only one with real MLB SS game and it's 80% likely he won't hit enough (better than Grenier's 95%-some).  I'll be bummed if two early Rutschman runs in 2022-2023 get hindered trying to see if someone in the org now can grow into like a 1.5 WAR shortstop so the payroll can stay well south of $75M.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/5/2020 at 10:14 PM, BohKnowsBmore said:

He's definitely taken quite a few SS who may have to move to 3B/2B in the last two drafts. Gunnar Henderson, Joseph Ortiz, and Darell Hernaiz in 2019. Then Westburg and Servideo in 2020.

 

7 hours ago, weams said:

Why do any of them need to move?

Just seems to be a somewhat common note in draft profiles for some (not necessarily all) of them. To be clear, I think this seems like a generally good approach to the draft on offense, taking SS/CF/C that can hit and if they need to slide down the defensive spectrum, so be it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, BohKnowsBmore said:

 

Just seems to be a somewhat common note in draft profiles for some (not necessarily all) of them. To be clear, I think this seems like a generally good approach to the draft on offense, taking SS/CF/C that can hit and if they need to slide down the defensive spectrum, so be it.

There is also just the fact that the better overall infield prospects are predominantly playing shortstop when drafted.

Not a lot of HS second basemen being looked at as viable professional prospects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I hope that Elias is not that dogmatic when it comes to FA pitching acquisitions. If you don't draft them and you don't sign them, you are limiting top pitching acquisitions to come only via trade. That strategy is not sustainable. Another Burnes type trade will hurt us bad. I would to go after any of the first four names on your "not in play" list. If we are letting Burnes walk out the door, most of these names cannot give you anywhere near the production and you will likely be at a disadvantage come game 1 in the playoffs. Some of the names from your "possible free agents" list should not even be considered IMO. Max Scherzer/Justin Verlander/Alex Cobb are all the end of the line and are very likely to be injured just like they were this season and the season before that. Those guys need to retire. Again, if you are not going to fish at the deep end the pool, then we will probably need two guys from your "possible free agent targets" list. Maybe Eovaldi +Montas? It's not great but gives us a shot to have a deeper rotation to go along with Eflin, Rodriguez, and Kremer. Then maybe you get Bradish back for the postseason? Maybe?
    • I’m pretty confident in saying that he won’t be the consensus #1 prospect like the others were.
    • A question precedes #2: when will the left field wall be fixed?  I think I remember Elias saying they probably went too far, which is quite literally true.  No reason they can't fix it quickly.  I had no problem with them moving it back but it is pretty absurd where it is.
    • On #3, I would guess that Elias is very wary about going longer than 3 years for a starting pitcher (maybe four years if pitcher is younger and AAV is favorable).  I think Mike and Sig believe the history of long-term SP deals isn’t favorable and the wrong deal could derail a mid-market team with dead money.  I’m not sure they are wrong (e.g., Patrick Corbin, Strasberg).   I don’t think ownership cares directly; I would guess they just give Elias an annual baseball ops budget and forecast and he can choose how he manages against that.   Not in play Gerrit Cole Corbin Burnes Max Fried Blake Snell Jack Flaherty    Possible free agent targets Yusei Kikuchi Nathan Eovaldi Nick Pivetta Sean Manaea Luis Severino Alex Cobb Max Scherzer Justin Verlander Jose Quintana Frankie Montas Spencer Turnbull Andrew Heaney Matthew Boyd   Possible trade targets Garret Crotchet Sandy Alcantera Jesus Luzardo Eduardo Cabrera Reid Detmers Emerson Hancock Jordan Montgomery Lance McCullers Jr.
    • Is Webb anything special.  I would rather replace Webb with Norfolk shuttle guy.
    • Our SS is Gunnar, our CF in this scenario would be Cowser, and C is Adley. Hopefully none of those guys are in contention for being the team's worst hitter next season. We don't need a power bat in LF - we need to add a good contact bat, that can use all fields and run.
    • Kemp was part of it but bringing back 2 UTIL IF is blocking your best prospect when your manager covets veteranosity. If they aren’t resigned then Holliday gets a longer leash. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...