Jump to content

#3 2020 Prospect: Ryan Mountcastle - LF/1B


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, wildcard said:

Why do you think Mountcastle will play in the OF when he is likely to be only adequate.   Hays, Mullins, Diaz and Santander all project to be better defensive OFers.

It depends on who hits, and whether Mancini is healthy and hits.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, wildcard said:

Why do you think Mountcastle will play in the OF when he is likely to be only adequate.   Hays, Mullins, Diaz and Santander all project to be better defensive OFers.

I’m not sure Santander is really more than adequate out there and he is older, so skills could diminish faster.  
 

Where Mountcastle ends up will probably be based on what Diaz, Mancini and, to a lesser extent, Santander do.  Mountcastle will have a spot, that’s for sure.  Where will be determined by others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I’m not sure Santander is really more than adequate out there and he is older, so skills could diminish faster.  
 

Where Mountcastle ends up will probably be based on what Diaz, Mancini and, to a lesser extent, Santander do.  Mountcastle will have a spot, that’s for sure.  Where will be determined by others.

Santander is a better defensive outfielder than Diaz.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, wildcard said:

Why do you think Mountcastle will play in the OF when he is likely to be only adequate.   Hays, Mullins, Diaz and Santander all project to be better defensive OFers.

If he’s adequate in the field, the bat is better than all of those other guys.  And if he eventually replaces Mancini at first, so be it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Frobby said:

That’s interesting, hadn’t heard that before.    

Santander has a better and more accurate arm and overall probably runs better consistent routes from what I've seen in the past and heard this year. Santander was a 1 OAA and 1% success added outfielder in RF so basically a little better than league average, so I'm not really sure where all of this negative opinion on his defense is coming from of late here on the board.

Personally, I like Santander a lot and my only concern with him is the same I have for Hays, and that's his ability to stay healthy over a 162 games schedule.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

I'll admit to not paying that close attention, but I thought Diaz was a prototypical RFer with a plus arm.  Guess not.

That’s the same thing I have read over the years.  Now, what I don’t know is if his injuries (particularly all the lower body injuries he has had) have zapped him of some of his range.  I guess that’s possible.

I haven’t read anything stated that though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I *HOPE* Mountcastle ends up at 1B/DH because that means enough of our OF prospects panned out. I think he could become an adequate LF with more time and more reps, but IF Santander, Hays, Mullins, Diaz and eventually Kjerstad break into the majors and prove themselves, there is just no room out there.

Ideally, we are looking at an OF of Santander, Hays and Diaz with Mullins as the 4th OF and Mountcastle and Mancini sharing 1B/DH by end of year next year. Of course, that means Hays needs to stay healthy and produce, Santander needs to be the guy we saw this year and Diaz needs prove himself all while Mancini shows he's healthy enough to play and get close to his previous self.

In an ideal world, Mountcastle is our first baseman for a long time. BUT...if Hays can't stay on the field and Mullins can't hit enough and Santander turns back to a .300-OBP guy there may be more of a need in the OF. Hopefully they keep developing some of the versatility for now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • I hope that Elias is not that dogmatic when it comes to FA pitching acquisitions. If you don't draft them and you don't sign them, you are limiting top pitching acquisitions to come only via trade. That strategy is not sustainable. Another Burnes type trade will hurt us bad. I would to go after any of the first four names on your "not in play" list. If we are letting Burnes walk out the door, most of these names cannot give you anywhere near the production and you will likely be at a disadvantage come game 1 in the playoffs. Some of the names from your "possible free agents" list should not even be considered IMO. Max Scherzer/Justin Verlander/Alex Cobb are all the end of the line and are very likely to be injured just like they were this season and the season before that. Those guys need to retire. Again, if you are not going to fish at the deep end the pool, then we will probably need two guys from your "possible free agent targets" list. Maybe Eovaldi +Montas? It's not great but gives us a shot to have a deeper rotation to go along with Eflin, Rodriguez, and Kremer. Then maybe you get Bradish back for the postseason? Maybe?
    • I’m pretty confident in saying that he won’t be the consensus #1 prospect like the others were.
    • A question precedes #2: when will the left field wall be fixed?  I think I remember Elias saying they probably went too far, which is quite literally true.  No reason they can't fix it quickly.  I had no problem with them moving it back but it is pretty absurd where it is.
    • On #3, I would guess that Elias is very wary about going longer than 3 years for a starting pitcher (maybe four years if pitcher is younger and AAV is favorable).  I think Mike and Sig believe the history of long-term SP deals isn’t favorable and the wrong deal could derail a mid-market team with dead money.  I’m not sure they are wrong (e.g., Patrick Corbin, Strasberg).   I don’t think ownership cares directly; I would guess they just give Elias an annual baseball ops budget and forecast and he can choose how he manages against that.   Not in play Gerrit Cole Corbin Burnes Max Fried Blake Snell Jack Flaherty    Possible free agent targets Yusei Kikuchi Nathan Eovaldi Nick Pivetta Sean Manaea Luis Severino Alex Cobb Max Scherzer Justin Verlander Jose Quintana Frankie Montas Spencer Turnbull Andrew Heaney Matthew Boyd   Possible trade targets Garret Crotchet Sandy Alcantera Jesus Luzardo Eduardo Cabrera Reid Detmers Emerson Hancock Jordan Montgomery Lance McCullers Jr.
    • Is Webb anything special.  I would rather replace Webb with Norfolk shuttle guy.
    • Our SS is Gunnar, our CF in this scenario would be Cowser, and C is Adley. Hopefully none of those guys are in contention for being the team's worst hitter next season. We don't need a power bat in LF - we need to add a good contact bat, that can use all fields and run.
    • Kemp was part of it but bringing back 2 UTIL IF is blocking your best prospect when your manager covets veteranosity. If they aren’t resigned then Holliday gets a longer leash. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...