Jump to content

Adley Rutschman 2021


glenn__davis

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, Dreadnought said:

I think playing him at 1st base is about maximizing his ABs at the professional level, while not having him catch 120 games in one year.  The pattern in six-game series have been, catch 3-4; IB or DH 2 to 3.

He has nothing to prove behind the plate. He is a better catcher than most of the catchers in the big leagues already. This is all about getting AB’s and he is now starting to get comfortable at the plate

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How many times is he going to be able to play first base in the majors if Mancini and Mountcastle are still with the O's? If Hayes ever quits getting hurt, there won't be many opportunities for Mountcastle to be in the OF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, panick said:

How many times is he going to be able to play first base in the majors if Mancini and Mountcastle are still with the O's? If Hayes ever quits getting hurt, there won't be many opportunities for Mountcastle to be in the OF.

If you play him at catcher 5 days a week and give two of the guys a day off once ever three weeks.  It is not like you are sitting guys often.  Week one Mountcastle and Mancini get day off. Week 2 Hays and Rutchman get a day off, week 3 Mullins and Santander get day off.  Now what happens to Stewart will be the issue if they don’t move someone.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/6/2021 at 9:02 AM, LTO's said:

As someone who has watched quite a few of his ABs on Milbtv and in person, I can tell you he should have even more walks than he does. AA umpires are pretty terrible. Having this level of plate discipline is such a useful tool as you progress.

Yeah, he let's a lot of "close" pitches go that look like balls but get called strikes by the umps. His strike zone judgement is no doubt outstanding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 I was at the game yesterday and sat directly behind home plate (the sun was BRUTAL for the early innings, I was mostly in the concourse but I ran down to my seat for every Ruthschmann at bat).

Tony is definitely right that his strike zone discipline is outstanding. I recorded most the pitches he faced on my phone (willing to send to anyone who’s interested) including the home run, which was super impressive, it was a flick of the wrist on his part and he hit it oppo to damn near the deepest part of the park. 

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The piece was about 50/50 Jeff Paternostro airing his back in the ballpark feelings and giving a report.

50 Hit / 50 Power are also the grades he gave for the Hit/Power combo, but he was effusive in praise for the 80 glove.   Speculated 10-20 runs of value go poof for him if we get robots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, OrioleDog said:

The piece was about 50/50 Jeff Paternostro airing his back in the ballpark feelings and giving a report.

50 Hit / 50 Power are also the grades he gave for the Hit/Power combo, but he was effusive in praise for the 80 glove.   Speculated 10-20 runs of value go poof for him if we get robots.

There is no way he gave Rutschman a 50 grade for power right? That is absolutely embarrassing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do believe when it comes to the baseball scouting industry, there are those who like to be contrarians. 

First of all, it gets clicks. Going against the common thought in regards to the #2 prospect in baseball is something people will notice and talk about. Look no further than SG being alarmed about something that wasn’t 100% glowing about AR. And here we are talking about it. Now Jeff Mary Elizabeth Masterantonio is on my radar. I’d not heard of him before. 
 

Second, I’m convinced that there’s no one that holds these people’s feet to the fire. There’s virtually no risk involved in writing about baseball prospects, some of the players will hit, many more will bust. People have relatively short memories and there are constantly articles like this being produced. It’s easy to get lost in the sheer volume of it all and forget what was written or discussed a few weeks ago. Due to the nature of the industry I’m convinced that these writers can say whatever they want, unchecked, as long as they don’t get too carried away. 
 

If AR is what this guy says he is he gets to beat his chest. If AR is God and this guy is wrong? Who cares, whatever his take at that moment was will be buried under a deluge of other takes since posted. Hardly anyone will remember or care. 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

I do believe when it comes to the baseball scouting industry, there are those who like to be contrarians. 

First of all, it gets clicks. Going against the common thought in regards to the #2 prospect in baseball is something people will notice and talk about. Look no further than SG being alarmed about something that wasn’t 100% glowing about AR. And here we are talking about it. Now Jeff Mary Elizabeth Masterantonio is on my radar. I’d not heard of him before. 
 

Second, I’m convinced that there’s no one that holds these people’s feet to the fire. There’s virtually no risk involved in writing about baseball prospects, some of the players will hit, many more will bust. People have relatively short memories and there are constantly articles like this being produced. It’s easy to get lost in the sheer volume of it all and forget what was written or discussed a few weeks ago. Due to the nature of the industry I’m convinced that these writers can say whatever they want, unchecked, as long as they don’t get too carried away. 
 

If AR is what this guy says he is he gets to beat his chest. If AR is God and this guy is wrong? Who cares, whatever his take at that moment was will be buried under a deluge of other takes since posted. Hardly anyone will remember or care. 

All of this is true…but it’s also true that scouts are routinely wrong and maybe he sees something others don’t want to see.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I may be misunderstanding, but if you are suggesting that you would recall Rogers for the playoffs, then I must respectfully and strongly disagree. Baker is odd man out here, or maybe Smith, but I would definitely keep Bowman
    • A litmus test is if you'd prefer Trevor Rogers back for last guy. Tell me if it sounds crazy, but a pitcher you can sign to a minor league deal in mid-August might not be competitive with the world's greatest hitters in late September. It is fun to curate a trick pitch that works for a minute.
    • Just read two interesting tidbits - Juan Soto has battered him something like 18/35 which seemed like a lot but I guess PHI and WSN saw each other a bunch in the NL East. Also that he passed 1000 career innings.   It caught me a little by surprise he has been around that long.    Fingers crossed Bradish and Grayson in their careers can get there.    Eflin is 3rd among pitchers at age 30 and down this season. Hopping to Active Leaders to see how few pitchers attain that in this Driveline/Arm Barn era, tonight he became the 57th active pitcher to get there.     He gives us the ~162 IP we hope for in 2025, it'd go up about 20 spots.
    • Westburg, Urias, Mountcastle… Good defense, even when there’s bad defense. Westburg missed a ball that went for a hit, but I didn’t feel any foreboding, no,”here we go again” because I felt sure that that one play wouldn’t ruin the game. And it didn’t. Good pitching, even when there’s bad pitching. Eflin had never in his whole career walked 5 guys, but I wasn’t worried, for some reason. Even when Bowman had his worst outing as an oriole, I wasn’t worried, no,”here we go again” because I felt sure we’d win. And we did. Good hitting, good base running, even when Santander REALLY wanted that triple… and didn’t get it.  The fundamental baseball smarts seem to have returned, so a mistake is just a mistake. I feel really good about this team now, even though they haven’t been perfect. I really feel they’ll cover for each other, and we will enter the playoffs strong. I feel most comfortable about facing the Yankees again; they just don’t seem like a strong team, and I’m not the least bit worried about facing them again.
    • That is strong language coming from you.  The only recent guy I really couldn’t stand was Jimenez, though I sure wasn’t keen on Kimbrel for most of the season either.
    • Did you really say tonight’s game didn’t mean much? 
    • To state the obvious, the magic number for home field in the WC series is now 1, with 4 games remaining.   Would love to v close that out tomorrow va. the Yankees and then relax all weekend.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...