Jump to content

Cedric Mullins as a CF


accinfo

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

So tired of fans that want to trade every good players the O's have.  I guess I want to cheer for a winning team, not a last place team that trades any good player.  Some fans on the hangout want to have an endless rebuild.  I feel like the O's with the talent that they have in the minors plus the talent in the majors can start trying to win next year.  Its time to stop trading core players. 

I agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Was he a build around player prior to this season?

Did you think he was a build around player just last month when he slashed 255/336/306/732?

Would you build around a 26 y/o 730 OPS CFer with no prior ML history of being good?

 

The answer to your questions are no. The answer to the question "Is he a build around player now" is TBD. 

Maybe the correct question is "Will some team overpay for him at the trade deadline based on this season ala Gerardo Parra?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

Was he a build around player prior to this season?

Did you think he was a build around player just last month when he slashed 255/336/306/732?

Would you build around a 26 y/o 730 OPS CFer with no prior ML history of being good?

 

I think it's a bit of hyperbole to say that nothing he's done in the first 2 or so months matters at all, considering it's over 1/3 of his major league stats to date.  They absolutely should change the narrative.  Should we expect him to continue performing well enough to be top 10 in batter WAR and wOBA?  probably not.  But his xwOBA is currently .344, which while lower than his actual wOBA, still indicates that at least some of his current production is real based on his exit velocity and launch angle profile.  It's also worth noting that fast players tend to beat out xwOBA because it doesn't capture value added by legging out infield hits, stretching singles to doubles, etc.  EV and launch angle starts stabilizing (r > 0.5) around 80 balls in play per this article:   https://theathletic.com/1014491/2019/06/07/sarris-understanding-exit-velocity-and-sample-sizes/

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Jagwar said:

The answer to your questions are no. The answer to the question "Is he a build around player now" is TBD. 

Maybe the correct question is "Will some team overpay for him at the trade deadline based on this season ala Gerardo Parra?"

Well I basically said it’s TBD.  But the oh so wise (I almost said that without laughing) Explosive diarrhea(or whatever his name is) said he already is a build around player.  Apparently a month plus one great series is all it takes??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Hallas said:

I think it's a bit of hyperbole to say that nothing he's done in the first 2 or so months matters at all, considering it's over 1/3 of his major league stats to date.  They absolutely should change the narrative.  Should we expect him to continue performing well enough to be top 10 in batter WAR and wOBA?  probably not.  But his xwOBA is currently .344, which while lower than his actual wOBA, still indicates that at least some of his current production is real based on his exit velocity and launch angle profile.  It's also worth noting that fast players tend to beat out xwOBA because it doesn't capture value added by legging out infield hits, stretching singles to doubles, etc.  EV and launch angle starts stabilizing (r > 0.5) around 80 balls in play per this article:   https://theathletic.com/1014491/2019/06/07/sarris-understanding-exit-velocity-and-sample-sizes/

 

Did I say it’s worth nothing

All I said he is that he has not proven yet that he is a player that you build a team around. 
 

Do you really think he has proven that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Did I say it’s worth nothing

All I said he is that he has not proven yet that he is a player that you build a team around. 
 

Do you really think he has proven that?

 

12 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

Mullins hasn’t done anything to say he is a build around player yet but the changes he has made to his swing are paying off bug time.  We will see if he can keep this up but I would be surprised to see the Os deal him in July.

"hasn't done anything" == "done nothing" to me anyway.

 

Maybe you meant "hasn't done enough" but I'm going by what you wrote.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Hallas said:

 

"hasn't done anything" == "done nothing" to me anyway.

 

Maybe you meant "hasn't done enough" but I'm going by what you wrote.

No, I meant what i said.  A really good April and a great series vs Cle is “hasn’t done anything to prove he is a BUILD YOUR TEAM AROUND player”

I made the comment that his swing adjustments have paid off big for him.  Obviously that means I’m saying he is improved.  But being improved doesn’t mean you want to build a team around him.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Did I say it’s worth nothing

All I said he is that he has not proven yet that he is a player that you build a team around. 
 

Do you really think he has proven that?

WTF does "build around" mean for a baseball player?  This isn't like basketball or ice hockey where teammates have to gell on the court/ice in order to be productive.  Mullins would be starting CF on all but 4=5 MLB teams, given his current production level.   I don't know if he'll maintain that pace, but thats someone I would want on my team.   Even at average production for CF level he'd still useful, because you can't have a superstar at every position.   Keeping him would not be interfering with us improving the team in other ways. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m with SG here - too early to say Mullins is a guy you could build your team around.   He’s building his case, though.   Nobody is ever untradeable in my view, but I’d certainly need an awfully good return in order to do it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

Was he a build around player prior to this season?

Did you think he was a build around player just last month when he slashed 255/336/306/732?

Would you build around a 26 y/o 730 OPS CFer with no prior ML history of being good?

 

Would I say right now that he is a "build around" player based on what we've seen this year, yes. Based on everything we know of his past, I'm more inclined to see it through a season or two, but I'm not trading him yet unless I was blown away by the package (There is no one on this team I would not move for the right package).

We are really in uncharted territory here because we've never seen a guy ditch switch hitting then tear it up like Mullins is doing. Mullins is entering his prime next year, so there is a chance he's a guy that we can build around since right now he's very good at four tools out of five and he's become a guy who knows how to hit his cut off man quickly to offset a below average arm.

I'm not ready to to anoint him the guy we build around yet, but I'm going to dismiss it either. I never thought Mullins would be more than a 4th outfielder platoon guy because of his inability to hit right=handed effectively, and since we've never actually seen someone ditch one side as a switch hitter and become very effective hitting the same hand pitching as the side he uses, who know he could become what we've seen this year?

What we have seen is that Mullins at 26-years old is currently playing like one of the best players in baseball. We can only hope he continues to sustain it, but even if there is some regression, he has a long way to fall before he isn't an above average center fielder at the major league level.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

No, I meant what i said.  A really good April and a great series vs Cle is “hasn’t done anything to prove he is a BUILD YOUR TEAM AROUND player”

I made the comment that his swing adjustments have paid off big for him.  Obviously that means I’m saying he is improved.  But being improved doesn’t mean you want to build a team around him.

 

This is a bit of semantics, but I think that the above matches the description of "haven't done enough" unless you feel that he is incapable of ever being a build-team-around player. (I think that is a semi reasonable argument given his age and lack of past success, even if it's one that I disagree with.)  I think that if you feel that he's on his way to proving it, then he couldn't have "done nothing."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A few more bombs and he's starting to look less like pre-concussion Brian Roberts and more like Mookie Betts without the arm. What we're seeing is nothing short of incredible. His ABs look so professional compared to much of the rest of the lineup. Everything is so under control, like watching an All-Star player that has been doing this for years. It's really remarkable. Like most everyone else, I had him pegged for 4th outfielder. It's like he just up and decided, screw this, I'm going to be great. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Hallas said:

This is a bit of semantics, but I think that the above matches the description of "haven't done enough" unless you feel that he is incapable of ever being a build-team-around player. (I think that is a semi reasonable argument given his age and lack of past success, even if it's one that I disagree with.)  I think that if you feel that he's on his way to proving it, then he couldn't have "done nothing."

There is a difference between that he has shown to be a good to very good everyday player or a build your team around guy.

A guy you build your team around (I agree with the above post that this isn’t like other sports where you do build around someone but hey, this is the comment that was made and started this discussion, so I’m going with that) is a multi time AS, MVP level guy.  Not a guy who has had a few good weeks after practically being nothing in his career.

Like I said, he had a 730ish OPS in May.  No one is building around a player like that.  If he was coming off just a good series vs Cle, we wouldn’t be having this discussion.  But since he is coming off of one of the better 3 game stretches in franchise history, the comment was made.  
 

This comment/discussion isn’t being had 4 days ago and yet somehow I’m crazy for saying we need to see more?  That’s not logical. 
 

So yes, he hasn’t done anything for me to say you build around him because there hasn’t been nearly enough sample size to put him on that level of a player.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, interloper said:

A few more bombs and he's starting to look less like pre-concussion Brian Roberts and more like Mookie Betts without the arm. What we're seeing is nothing short of incredible. His ABs look so professional compared to much of the rest of the lineup. Everything is so under control, like watching an All-Star player that has been doing this for years. It's really remarkable. Like most everyone else, I had him pegged for 4th outfielder. It's like he just up and decided, screw this, I'm going to be great. 

His swing changes have meant a lot.  Gotta give him and the coaching staff credit for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • For Norfolk, Cook has started 29 games at 1B with a .996 fpct. and 5 games each at LF, CF, RF.   He started one game at 3B and made an error and at lower levels played a decent amount of 2B.   I think he’s probably an emergency/last resort guy at 2B/3B and @Tony-OH seems skeptical of his outfield defense in general.  Saying all that, with a LH heavy hitting OF he has a decent shot as soon as next year, especially if Norby gets moved.  Norby, with the ability to play LF/RF/2B would probably be his chief competitor for a backup role.  Also depends on what they do with Hays.
    • Your definition of what we need and @Bemorewins definiton of what we need may be different.    Getting a #3 starter he feels confident as a game #3 starter in the playoffs.   Who, in his mind, is that pitcher?   Fedde will not require one of those guys.  Crochet might.
    • We do not have to give up Holliday, Basallo, or Mayo to get what we need.
    • So you think Elias will give up one of the top 3 prospects to get upgrades?
    • “Dramatics”? That’s an interesting way of framing my opinion. I promise you I am as calm and cool as a cucumber. There’s no “dramatics” going on here. As you know, numbers fluctuate during any given period of time in the season. Good/great players have bad/cold stretches and bad/terrible players have good stretches. IMO we do not possess the type of top end talent at the back end of the bullpen needed to win multiple rounds against the best opposition in October.  If you are confident in Cano/Kimbrel or worse in Vespi/Baker/Perez/etc getting Soto and Judge out in a big spot late in the game in Yankee stadium in October, that is fine. I am not.  Just as an observer of baseball, Holmes is a much better pitcher than any reliever that we have. I would be much more confident in his talent than any reliever that we have. Now if we had Felix that would be one thing. But this season we do not. And I would hate for a team as good as ours to be held back by not making the needed/necessary move(s) before we get into October.  IMO we did that last season (with the starting pitching) and it didn’t end well. And I acknowledge that everybody doesn’t think like me nor have the same championship expectations/aspirations. Some fans/posters here have stated as much and that they are happy if we have a winning team year after year or if we just make it into the tournament year after year, regardless of results when we get there. And that’s fine. That’s just not my desired outcome. The great thing about this board is that we don’t have to agree and are able to express our opinions.
    • That’s right. Great times are here and more ahead with this group. 
    • Over/under on the number of times we walk Judge and Soto in this series?   10?  Nobody else really worries me.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...