Jump to content

The jerking around of Zac Lowther


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, wildcard said:

I think if Elias projects his future rotation it doubtful that Lowther is in it.   Means, Grayson, DL, maybe Bradish.  There are others like T Wells,  Kremer and Zimmerman that are ahead of Lowther.  He projects as a bullpen pitcher going forward.

Someone has to do the job he has been doing.  On call to the majors.  With Baumann hurt or ineffective, and  A Well starting slow,  Lowther kind of fell into the job as next man up.   That does not mean its his future though.

How nice is it that someone with Lowther's resume is projected for bullpen at best? I'd like to see Lowther get more of a chance at some point but you are right, he has several options ahead of him long term even for the back end. Still, I could see us DFA Harvey and trade Lopez. That would open up some innings this year for Lowther and Kremer to get some more consistent reps. Of course, they have competition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

How nice is it that someone with Lowther's resume is projected for bullpen at best? I'd like to see Lowther get more of a chance at some point but you are right, he has several options ahead of him long term even for the back end. Still, I could see us DFA Harvey and trade Lopez. That would open up some innings this year for Lowther and Kremer to get some more consistent reps. Of course, they have competition.

Your comment makes me wonder if Lopez has garnered some trade value? He seems to be trending up, even though he doesn’t seem to be consistent after five innings or about 70 pitches. But for a creative staff, such as Tampa Bay, for instance, five solid innings, or even four solid innings, is a valuable arrow in the quiver.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Philip said:

Your comment makes me wonder if Lopez has garnered some trade value? He seems to be trending up, even though he doesn’t seem to be consistent after five innings or about 70 pitches. But for a creative staff, such as Tampa Bay, for instance, five solid innings, or even four solid innings, is a valuable arrow in the quiver.

Right, for teams that are smart enough to use him that in a way to give him a reasonable chance for success, he'd be useful.  But since the O's haven't really done that for the most part, he likely has very little trade value.  

I concur with Aristotelian about Lowther.  Lowther and Kremer should be given major opportunities with Baltimore throughout this year.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, waroriole said:

I haven’t seen anything that suggests he’s more than organizational filler. Straight FB, low 90s, not great command. He hasn’t given them a chance to keep him in Baltimore because he gets lit up every time he’s out there. 

If organizational filler is our #11 prospect then isn’t all the hype about our system just so much BS?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moose Milligan said:

His stuff is that of an org guy. It doesn’t take much watching to see that. 
 

That said, I’d rather see him getting bombed instead of Harvey. 

If Lowther had just pitched better and gotten hitters out, it's likely this thread wouldn't be a thread. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Philip said:

If organizational filler is our #11 prospect then isn’t all the hype about our system just so much BS?

No. 

27 minutes ago, Jagwar said:

If Lowther had just pitched better and gotten hitters out, it's likely this thread wouldn't be a thread. 

Well it’s obvious as to why he’s not getting hitters out. He’s got a Doc Brown fastball and his other offerings don’t seem special either. Either he’s nibbling or he has command issues, hard to tell which. 
 

He needs more innings and more consistent innings, I don’t disagree with the premise of the thread. I’d like to be wrong about what he brings to the table and his future and he should be given every opportunity to prove me correct. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't like the way he has been handled this year either. Second tier prospect or organization guy? I don't know yet, and it doesn't really matter right now. They don't know for sure yet either. I would bet that Elias does not like the way he has had to move Lowther around, but had to do it out of necessity. They had him at the Alternate sight, so they got a good read on where his innings are. I think he is a candidate to replace Paul Fry when he is traded in July. Or perhaps he does that in 2022. Better get him some better sticky stuff, though. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every team had optionable pitchers that haven’t become established ML guys.  The move up and down in the first full season post pandemic.  Pitch well and you’ll get more chances.  Wells has grown from a Rule 5 guy that had to be hidden to a higher leverage pitcher vying for some starts.  Why?   Because he’s pitched well when given a chance.  Lowther hasn’t.

  • Upvote 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

No. 

Well it’s obvious as to why he’s not getting hitters out. He’s got a Doc Brown fastball and his other offerings don’t seem special either. Either he’s nibbling or he has command issues, hard to tell which. 
 

He needs more innings and more consistent innings, I don’t disagree with the premise of the thread. I’d like to be wrong about what he brings to the table and his future and he should be given every opportunity to prove me correct. 

You’ve (we’ve) seen him pitch at his worst.   Let’s see how he looks when he’s at his best before we judge what he can do.   But he needs to get consistent innings somewhere and sharpen up before we can do that.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Surhoffan17 said:

100% agreed!  I don't like someone like him being shuttled back and forth like this.  He has some potential and needs to be consistently given starts at AAA IMO.  He's succeeded everywhere prior to COVID and I think could be either a 4/5 starter or maybe LH relief specialist.  

This should be a spot for Tom Eshelman or Connor Greene or one of those types.  

You want to spend a 40 man roster spot on Eshelman or Greene?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I'm lost for words about why Rutschman struggled, other than as I've long said he's a catcher and you're not going to get a MOO monster bat playing 110 games behind the plate- but the overall outcome of the team was within what I thought was reasonable, if a bit on the low end. Regarding the depth, Holliday and Mayo are more talented than Urias, but if we had gotten rid of Urias, Mateo, and Mountcastle to hand them spots, this team would have been worse for it, and maybe not even make the playoffs. Urias is good.  Mountcastle is good.  They're not "everyday" players according to your definition, but we have exactly one of those guys.  That doesn't mean every one else is " not good." I wouldn't be surprised to see all three back next year.  I wouldn't be surprised if they moved on from 2-3 of them.  Though I think the former is far wiser than the latter, though it depends on a lot of other things.
    • My post is coming off the wrong way.  The OP I quoted seemed like you were “lost for words” about why the team struggled the way they did. All I’m saying is I think you are like that because you didn’t see the scenarios where this much of a drop off from last year was going to happen. And btw, the depth (to me at least) wasn’t a good thing.  Depth is good when the players are good. If not, they are just guys blocking better talent.
    • But we have no idea who told her or of the info is good. She has given no reason to believe her. Im sure someone told her something but im not sure she smart enough to be able to tell the difference between good info and bad info.
    • I'm a big fan.  It doesn't mean I have sources in the clubhouse. Do we have any idea who her sources are?  Does she have any kind of track record of having reliable sources?
    • I don't know who this woman is and I don't do Twitter. And this is what I touched on in the other thread: I don't know what the best path forward is b/c I don't know exactly what the problem is. I don't think Hyde needs to go, but if this is true- and I have no idea if it is or not- he should be gone. The talk of veteran leaders brings questions.  What was insufficient of the leadership of Satandaner, Mullins, Burnes, and Kimbrel?  
    • Sig for me is notably rigorous trying to combat this.    I feel pretty sure he had a say in crafting his very geeky title, a reflection of his personal brand. We'll see how it goes here if it becomes recommending Adam Frazier and Kyle Gibson as correct for the roster once again.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...