Jump to content

2022 MLB Draft Discussion (Use this thread to discuss all picks, not Orioles picks)


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Mizerooskie said:

That would seem to indicate that Holliday really did end up atop their board for non-financial reasons.

I think it’s obvious that Holliday was 1 on their board and not a signability pick.

Whether or not they are right remains to be seen of course.  I would have preferred Jones but unlike last year, I don’t feel they passed on a player they rated higher just to save money and that means they believe Holliday is the better prospect and Im good with that.  I’m good with that process, which I feel is of the utmost importance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, SteveA said:

Tuesday we will load up on pitchers.

That is Elias' MO. We'll see how this all works out but I'm starting to think he thinks he can take the Spencer Watkins of the world and make them decent starters so why waste picks on high injury risk young pitchers?

We'll see if that's right long term. I'd really like some good arms to dream upon in the system that he drafted or signed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sunday night's second round had draft picks read by drunk former major leaguers.  Wouldn't it be amazing if the third round picks were presented by wildly hungover former major leaguers?  Would be great to see Demper walk up there with a bloody mary in his hand.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

That is Elias' MO. We'll see how this all works out but I'm starting to think he thinks he can take the Spencer Watkins of the world and make them decent starters so why waste picks on high injury risk young pitchers?

We'll see if that's right long term. I'd really like some good arms to dream upon in the system that he drafted or signed.

They also might think that they can cut deals with teams like the Guardians and Angels that have drafted too many pitchers.  Of course, the issue with that is the Guardians seem to be really good at drafting and developing pitching.  The Angels, not so much but it isn't clear that their issues are development vs just drafting poorly.  If they draft poorly, there isn't much sense in trading with guys that you don't think you can develop yourselves.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

That is Elias' MO. We'll see how this all works out but I'm starting to think he thinks he can take the Spencer Watkins of the world and make them decent starters so why waste picks on high injury risk young pitchers?

We'll see if that's right long term. I'd really like some good arms to dream upon in the system that he drafted or signed.

The best rotation the Os have had in a while was headed up by guys like Chen and Miguel Gonzalez.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

The best rotation the Os have had in a while was headed up by guys like Chen and Miguel Gonzalez.  

And we've had plenty of bad rotations made up of guys that were that year's equivalent of Chen and Gonzalez.  It's great when you hit with a guy like that but mostly you don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

And we've had plenty of bad rotations made up of guys that were that year's equivalent of Chen and Gonzalez.  It's great when you hit with a guy like that but mostly you don't.

No doubt.  But what you are illustrating is the exact point of what the model is telling you…pitching is really hard to predict, develop and keep healthy.  

It’s far easier to develop the bats.  
 

You can always make trades.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More fodder for 26 or 52 weeks from now.     Remind me if I'm missing any, but the Orioles haven't really done a large scale consolidation trade attempt since Glenn Davis, right?

As surely as Swing Decisions improving in the aggregate over time, it feels like a mathematical certainty its going to happen for shaping the accumulated talent to an October roster, whether '23, '24, '25, etc.

We now know Adley-Mountcastle-Westburg-Holliday-Gunnar-Cowser-Mullins-Kjerstad-Mayo are perhaps your Best Nine bats for the peak lineups.      Westburg-Mullins-Mayo-Hays are I guess four guys for three spots beneath the Aircraft Carrier/Beast tier player.  Westburg's probably going to outdo Hays in $$$/WAR in a couple more Augusts as much as Stowers is about to outdo Mancini.

Santander-Urias-Stowers-Norby-Prieto-Rhodes-Hernaiz-Beavers-Wagner-Fabian...spare parts, unless more Gunnar type breakouts occur.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

No doubt.  But what you are illustrating is the exact point of what the model is telling you…pitching is really hard to predict, develop and keep healthy.  

It’s far easier to develop the bats.  
 

You can always make trades.

I'm not at all sure that I'm being told that.

The O's have brought in a ton of Chen/Gonzalez type hitters over the years and missed with them as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I'm not at all sure that I'm being told that.

The O's have brought in a ton of Chen/Gonzalez type hitters over the years and missed with them as well.

Sure, and we can list all of the pitchers drafted in the top 5 rounds over the last 30 years and check on the success rate there as well.  It ain't pretty.   Obviously, we hope GRod and Hall are the exceptions along with very few others along the way.  

The pitching pipeline has been constructed.  The oil just hasn't reached the other end yet.

Dominican Republic and Venezuela.  Now I welcome your snark.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • The game is already tied. If he gets thrown out, the O's still have a runner in scoring position and just one out. You really didn't have much to lose by sending him there, with a chance to end the game.
    • Yes.  He’s not a great bunter but at least try it once.   Santander was today’s choker.  He’s gotta be able to hit a freaking fly ball there.  
    • Same exact question Ravens fans ask every season.  No killer instinct.  In the game’s biggest moments, they come up small.  Exactly what you saw today.  Pathetic 
    • Should we have gone with a suicide or safety squeeze with Mullins? He might be better at bunting than hitting deep fly balls. Just a thought. 
    • I agree with the second but not the first. If the first fails, that's an extra out. If the second fails then they just get an out at home instead of an out at first, which is not really relevant with Gunnar going to 3rd. For the first case I'd think you need to be like 80% to succeed for it to be right, but for the second like 20%.
    • Bump. Tonight's game wasn't just "winnable" -- it would have been one of the top 2-3 wins of the season. Down 2 in the 9th and we come out single, single, walk, double to tie the game and have two of our fastest runners on 2nd and 3rd with no outs, with our 2-3-4 hitters coming up next.  And our guys gagged. They wilted under pressure. They choked.  Again.  This has happened so many times this season that I believe we need to consider the real possibility that the Orioles as currently constructed lack the character, stamina, -- the heart, if you will -- to win games like this. I think these players fail so often because they expect to fail. I remember after we won it all in '83 reporters were interviewing Ken Singleton in the locker room and one of them asked if the Orioles had been lucky. "You make your own luck" he responded. Well, the 2024 Orioles are making their own bad luck over and over again. How does that cycle of failure come to an end? I wish I knew.
    • I know the OH hates Holliday, but it's a no brainer keeping him over Soto. We're talking about bench players who are going to, at most, have a small role in a few games. Soto has no pop and is slow. He's a warm body as it is. Holliday's ability to run can be very useful in the playoffs. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...