Jump to content

O's 2nd in the AL with a 3.04 team ERA


wildcard

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Ripken said:

It's super early but it would be great to think the development program is starting to show results.

It would be nice if a factual basis emerges to change the narrative about our pitching development.   Let’s see how it goes over the next few months.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Mooreisbetter27 said:

Tate's is filthy and Zimmerman's is looking really good.  The good location makes me wonder how much the catcher is playing a part.  I know that's hard to calculate... but maybe its making somewhat of a difference.  

Well considering Hyde talked about wanting the C to just put the target in the middle, I’m not sure how much that matters.

Chirinos is likely making a mental difference, not a physical one.

I have to believe this is a larger development thing going on but of course, we need to see it over a long period of time before getting too excited about it but it’s better to see it than not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Well considering Hyde talked about wanting the C to just put the target in the middle, I’m not sure how much that matters.

Chirinos is likely making a mental difference, not a physical one.

I have to believe this is a larger development thing going on but of course, we need to see it over a long period of time before getting too excited about it but it’s better to see it than not.

I agree, mostly. My perception is that passed balls (and wild pitches) are down now that Seve has moved on, and just being able to catch the ball back there, makes me think Chirinos has made a physical difference. His framing/presentation is much much better as well.

To your point, I can imagine that when Chirinos calls for bouncing a breaking ball, the pitcher has a lot more confidence with runners on base. That, along with his calming presence, make him a solid addition for young pitchers. Bemboom has been pretty solid as well.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jammer7 said:

I agree, mostly. My perception is that passed balls (and wild pitches) are down now that Seve has moved on, and just being able to catch the ball back there, makes me think Chirinos has made a physical difference. His framing/presentation is much much better as well.

To your point, I can imagine that when Chirinos calls for bouncing a breaking ball, the pitcher has a lot more confidence with runners on base. That, along with his calming presence, make him a solid addition for young pitchers. Bemboom has been pretty solid as well.

Zimmermann said he had a lot of confidence in Chirinos ability to read the hitter and call for the right pitch.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sports Guy said:

It seems to me that they really value the CU as a secondary pitch you throw a lot.  I personally love that. 
 

Do you mean it was a bad idea to take away Bundy's best pitch even though the most successful teams were featuring the cutter?

Really crazy what they were doing back then. The good news was the 85 Cardinals would steal fewer bases against us than just about anyone, so there's that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LookinUp said:

Do you mean it was a bad idea to take away Bundy's best pitch even though the most successful teams were featuring the cutter?

Really crazy what they were doing back then. The good news was the 85 Cardinals would steal fewer bases against us than just about anyone, so there's that.

Bundy with 1 run allowed in two games and a .087 ERA Speaking of SSS,only 10 innings. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to say I've rarely heard the broadcasters talk so openly about the catching position being such an upgrade from last year. Even Ben McDonald got in on it. Couple that with the fact that Hyde is dumping praise on Chirinos and Bemboom, and then the pitchers saying things... where there's smoke there's fire. We already knew that Severino was a bad blocker, but maybe he was also really bad about handling the pitching staff and calling games. 

Then also the fact that Elias so unceremoniously dumped all of Severino, Wynns, and Sisco and had no problem carrying exactly 0 catchers on his roster for months. It really seems like they said, yeah we're done with all these guys. And confidently so. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LookinUp said:

Do you mean it was a bad idea to take away Bundy's best pitch even though the most successful teams were featuring the cutter?

Really crazy what they were doing back then. The good news was the 85 Cardinals would steal fewer bases against us than just about anyone, so there's that.

This is immediately the first thing I thought of was Bundy (and other pitchers) not being allowed to throw the cutter during the reign of Buck & Duquette.

I'm glad to see stopping a pitcher from throwing one of their most effective pitches isn't a thing anymore. Also harkens back to Arietta asking the Cubs to let him pitch the way he wanted over the Orioles forcing him to be something he was not. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Sure.  We heard that stuff.  It’s cliche.  It’s not like it means much.

Again, it doesn’t mean it’s not true but just because the praise is there, it doesn’t mean that we should put much weight into it.

From the Sun,a few years back.

Orioles catcher Jesús Sucre is already earning praise from the pitching staff and manager Brandon Hyde for the way he handles a game behind the plate. His game-calling ability was on display in David Hess' no-hit bid Monday and again Tuesday as Andrew Cashner turned in his best start in nearly a year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Bahama O's Fan said:

So while it is a SSS, it's better to be here in this position that having horrible pitching so far. 

Yep, and if our ERA was really bad right now, because that would mesh with expectations, a lot of the same people who are cautioning small sample size now would NOT be mentioning SSS, they would be piling on about what a disgraceful pitching staff we have.

  • Upvote 2
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • The age is certainly part of it.  But the larger part is he only hits home runs, and don't bring anything else tangible to the team.  Doesn't get on base well, doesn't have speed on the basepaths and plays a below average outfield.  Power wise he's very good and solid, at least this year which is an outlier compared to his others, but there is nothing else he does well.  He does have the advantage of being a switch hitter which is a big bonus, especially with Hyde and his obsession with lefty/righty matchups, but that only goes so far.  If he brought more to the table, then the age wouldn't matter as much, as if the power drops off he could be helpful in other ways.  But he doesn't, and that's the main reason I wouldn't sign him to a deal.  Age is A factor, but for me the type of player he is contributes more.   I agree that the market will give him too many years.  I don't care about the money so much, but I think anything beyond a couple 2-3 years is a bad idea.  I want to see us spend, but I want to see us spend wisely.  No more Davis/Trumbo type deals.  Spend the money on players that deserve it, not one dimensional players who are very likely to age poorly.  Santander was a great success story and it was one of the best rule V picks ever.  But it's time to let some other team pay for his decline, as I really don't see a Cruz type future for him.  
    • Agreed. So to put it very simply, if we win 2/3 and the Twins lose 2/3 this weekend we are IN.
    • There’s going to be a lot of healthy discussion about how to spend our money. MLBTraderumors has already started. Here’s the O’Hearn paragraph from their article about picking up options( on Jimenez’ option, they said”haha no”)
    • The tiebreakers are weird because we could get 2 wins vs Tigers/Twins and clinch the playoff spot but could also get 3 wins and not make the playoffs.  
    • Nope.  Too many years.  I agree with giving him the QO and letting him walk.  I might entertain a 2-3 year deal, but that's the most I'd go.
    • Yes I should have said by inter division we hold tie breaker on both if head to head.  3 way tie we would finish ahead of Tigers but behind Twins but still get in.   So the magic number is really 5 but with asterisk on that because it could be 4 with the right 2 wins vs Tigers or Twins.  
    • Whatever seems to be possibly ailing Adley, IMO looks like it only affects him when hitting.  He sprang up outta his crouch like a Jack-in-the-Box and hustled for that foul pop/bunt yesterday and did not look like he was suffering any ill effects. But what do I know?  🤔🤣  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...