Jump to content

Gunnar Henderson 2022


Just Regular

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, glenn__davis said:

Interesting phrasing there Frobby.  "They would need to do it".  Almost like they'd be forced to instead of intentionally slow-playing him.

That’s not what I intended to convey.   Elias has said they want to move guys up when they are not being challenged at a level.   But, you have to be able to distinguish between when a player has just had a hot start vs. when he’s not being challenged.   I felt that if Henderson performed at the level he was at for another 4 weeks or so I’d be pretty confident this was no mere hot streak.   And he’s done that.  So far as I’m concerned, he should be promoted within the next couple of weeks.   200 PA at 1.037 OPS is incredibly impressive. Neustrom moved last year after 261 PA at .831.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Frobby said:

That’s not what I intended to convey.   Elias has said they want to move guys up when they are not being challenged at a level.   But, you have to be able to distinguish between when a player has just had a hot start vs. when he’s not being challenged.   I felt that if Henderson performed at the level he was at for another 4 weeks or so I’d be pretty confident this was no mere hot streak.   And he’s done that.  So far as I’m concerned, he should be promoted within the next couple of weeks.   200 PA at 1.037 OPS is incredibly impressive. Neustrom moved last year after 261 PA at .831.

Grayson was not being challenged in Norfolk.

Playing the gaming game is a more important concern.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

The one issue folks have pointed out with Gunnar is his splits. Despite his overall success he is .147/.502 vs LHP. Hard to say he isn't being challenged there, although it's possible he just is what he is. 

Gunnar's splits with LHP indicates he has been sitting when LHP is in the game. Gunnar has 22 games played against LHP with 34 at bats total this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

Gunnar's splits with LHP indicates he has been sitting when LHP is in the game. Gunnar has 22 games played against LHP with 34 at bats total this year. 

He's played 45 of 46 games so I don't think he's sitting. Just appears to be a small sample and facing a lot of RHP. O's should be doing everything they can to get him AB's vs LHP but there's only so much you can do. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

Gunnar's splits with LHP indicates he has been sitting when LHP is in the game. Gunnar has 22 games played against LHP with 34 at bats total this year. 

He's actually had 43 PAs though with seven walks and two HBP against southpaws. My concern with him against lefties is he's gotten to the point that he's basically hoping to walk or just make contact with only one extra base hit against them.  

His slash against right-handers though is a crazy .365/.497/.696/1.193 that's impact level for a 20-year old in AA.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, seak05 said:

I just wonder with lefty’s if he’s gotten so few reps it’s hard for him to improve 

Obviously it's going to always be a smaller sample size because f there being less lefties, but it's been consistent for him to struggle against them as a pro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Obviously it's going to always be a smaller sample size because f there being less lefties, but it's been consistent for him to struggle against them as a pro.

Yeah, it’s definitely something he’s struggled with. I’m just thinking it’s probably harder to improve in an area where you’re getting so few opportunities for repetitions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

Grayson was not being challenged in Norfolk.

Playing the gaming game is a more important concern.

1.  I firmly believe Grayson was about to be called up.

2.  The considerations are a bit different when moving between MiL levels vs. moving to the majors.   

  • Upvote 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frobby said:

1.  I firmly believe Grayson was about to be called up.

2.  The considerations are a bit different when moving between MiL levels vs. moving to the majors.   

1-We have zero actual evidence Grayson was getting called up.

We did have actual evidence he wasn't being challenged in Norfolk.

 

2- Why should it be? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

He's actually had 43 PAs though with seven walks and two HBP against southpaws. My concern with him against lefties is he's gotten to the point that he's basically hoping to walk or just make contact with only one extra base hit against them.  

His slash against right-handers though is a crazy .365/.497/.696/1.193 that's impact level for a 20-year old in AA.

Well, at least he’s cut his  K rate vs. LHP from 38% last year to 21% this year.   But otherwise, you’re right that hitting vs. LHP has been a big weakness for him.  But he can work on that in AAA as well as in AA, so I wouldn’t hold up a promotion for that.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

1-We have zero actual evidence Grayson was getting called up.

We did have actual evidence he wasn't being challenged in Norfolk.

 

2- Why should it be? 

There aren’t the same financial ramifications.   I mean, I guess you could argue that keeping him in AA longer will make it easier to justify starting him in AAA again next year, but I’m not sure teams take it that far.   

We’ll see what they do.  With our luck, he’s due for a strained glute any day now anyway.   
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Not trying to be naive or contradictory, but are we sure that he's swinging at bad pitches?  
    • I tend to agree, I'm not convinced. Cowser had hand/nerve stuff and continued to play his game. Westburg broke his hand, came back, and looked good. Not sure why getting hit on the hand suddenly made Adley swing at trash out of the zone. 
    • I hate that Adley getting hit on the hand is the excuse why he kept playing and his season went down the crapper, yet Italian Breakfast gets hit on the hand, breaks his thumb and works his ass off to get back to his team in time for the playoffs.    I’m a 50% believer that Adley getting hit on the hand is the reason that he was so bad towards the end of the season, but it still doesn’t explain the drop in OBP. He’s getting down to Adam Jones levels of on base percentage.  His approach seems to be totally different than when he first came up. A hurt hand doesn’t have anything to do with that. 
    • I watched both the Elias and Hyde press conferences in full and they both get weird around the Adley question. You can feel the hesitation on saying it's not an injury, and the way they kind of squirm around the question. If we can point to the HBP then surely they can do and would have done MRIs if Adley still felt iffy after the x-ray. Unless he's truly hiding it. But it sure feels like all parties know about something and for some reason that makes no sense to me, they aren't divulging it. 
    • They might not even know. Initial x-rays were negative, it's possible that Adley thought he could just play through it and maybe it wasn't painful, just fatigued? Who knows. But unless Adley tells them (assuming they're not hiding it), nothing they can really do. Wonder if Adley just felt the All Star Break was coming up, so he'd just deal.  I think it's way too obvious of a data point to ignore, personally. 
    • One interesting thing is I think he homered later that game and it was his last for a while. 
    • Roster-wise and money-availability-wise, yes, the Orioles are the best fit of the 30 teams.  Location-wise and track-record-of-spending-wise, not so much.  I kind of think SF is the team. Posey just meddled in the terrible signing of Chapman, as former player GMs often do, and I could see him going hard after a big signing and overpaying like hell for him. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...