Jump to content

Gunnar Henderson 2022


Just Regular

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Moose Milligan said:

Use your head.  It's the same ball against the same kind of bats, usually made out of maple, maybe hickory.  If ballplayers are swinging at the same speed, it's going to make the same sound.

The variables here are the ballparks, specifically how many people are in the ballpark.  Human beings packed close together absorb sound.  That's why Gunnar's homer sounded so loud last night, it ricocheted off the seats in Fenway.  That's why spring training homers sound so loud, those little stadiums are rarely full and the sound bounces off the seats which are metal and/or plastic.

The other variable is the microphone placement for the TV crews and where they're located.  No one here heard Gunnar's shot last night with their own ears unless you were at the stadium, you heard it through a TV microphone somewhere in Fenway and out through your TV speakers.  The closer that microphone is to the batter's box, the louder it'll be.

I'm sure a guy like Henderson sounds different than Phillips on average because he's bigger and stronger, but no one can tell me that a 110 EV from Stanton and a 110 EV from Phillips hit with the same type of bat on a pitch at the same velocity sounds drastically different.  

That's why Buck O'Neil said what he said about Bo Jackson.  He heard Bo hitting in batting practice, in an empty Royals stadium, the sound rifling off empty seats.  I'm gonna do a @DrungoHazewoodand be a baseball romantic killjoy,  but do we trust a man in his 70s and his memory of what Babe Ruth's bat and Josh Gibson's bat sounded like 50 or 60 years prior?  

No. 

But it makes a great story, it gets people right in their feelers.  Babe Ruth.  Josh Gibson.  Bo Jackson.  Wow.  

But I'm sure if Phil Rizzuto really got a hold of one at one point, it'd sound similar.

An acoustic bat could probably be designed so that even if Brett Phillips is hitting the ball at 90 EV it would sound way louder and better than say Stanton hitting the ball at 110.  That would blow the minds of the old timers. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, webbrick2010 said:

And is the force vector in the same direction of the rotation of the earth or opposite, or something in between

Perhaps a West bound HR, sounds different than an East bound HR.

Also since sound it propagated by air, the direction of the wind relative to the observer (fan) needs to be accounted for.

Are you taking the Coriolis effect into account?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Aglets said:

Force does indeed equal mass * acceleration.  Now assume you have two batted balls with equal exit velocities.  Is it your contention that one might spend a longer time in contact with the wood than the other which would lead to a significant difference in acceleration?

I guess the initial velocity from the pitch coming in is another variable actually. 

I'm going to go ahead and assume that the contact times are so close on same exit velocities as to be irrelevant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

An acoustic bat could probably be designed so that even if Brett Phillips is hitting the ball at 90 EV it would sound way louder and better than say Stanton hitting the ball at 110.  That would blow the minds of the old timers. 

If I were the Rays in their dome I'd totally replace normal air with some other mixture that includes inert(ish) gases like argon or helium or sulfur hexaflouride that have different acoustic properties to make the sound off the bat really wild.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

If I were the Rays in their dome I'd totally replace normal air with some other mixture that includes inert(ish) gases like argon or helium or sulfur hexaflouride that have different acoustic properties to make the sound off the bat really wild.

Ah, but do dead men swing bats?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I've made it clear that if they don't sign Santa and Burnes I'm ok with it as long as the money is allocated to other players they feel that fits their profile better .You know you have people on here like SG who only hears what he wants to hear. I need to learn to ignore that guy. 
    • Oh mr know it all. Who most times is wrong. Lol
    • I also think Santander will age better than Trumbo, despite my repeated comparisons of the two players. But I don't know that he will age better than Trumbo and all of the other one dimensional sluggers who were enjoying the retired millionaire sports star lifestyle by their mid-30s, and I don't want the Orioles to be on the hook when the world finds out in 2 or 3 years. Re-signing Santander to a 4 year, $80 million dollar deal is something the DD/PA regime would have done. Hopefully the ME/DR regime is smarter than that (and I think they are). 22nd percentile is really bad, man. And it's unlikely to improve in his 30s.
    • Looks like Baseball Fandom was at the game today!
    • But that is not what you said. You said he’s a bad fielder, just not quite Trumbo-tier. Thus, you were stating he is close to as bad a fielder as Trumbo was, which is not correct. Generally speaking, no player makes up the loss of offensive value with defensive value as the age. It is usually one of the first things to go. I was not making any sort of argument that he was going to make up declining offense with defense, just pointing out that you made a preposterous statement.
    • At least relative to the rest of the league Santander has an interesting profile because he is comfortably above-average at making contact; his whiff rates are much better than Trumbo's so he's not really as much of a TTO player as you would think.  This gives him hope that he will age a little bit better than someone like Trumbo.  Though he's still got a good shot of being out of the league in 3 years.
    • It's not the money, it's the years.  I wouldn't mind signing him for a year or two, even at what I'd consider to be stupid money.  But what I DON'T agree with is signing him for any more than 2-3 years as I don't think he's going to age well.  And I expect him to get more than 3 years from someone, so I'm a hard pass.  Can we afford him?  Money wise, sure.  But I don't want to see us stuck with him 4-5 years down the road when his skillset has greatly diminished, but he's still playing every day because we owe him a lot of money and a lot of loyalty.  Let some other club take that risk, get the QO pick and move on.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...