Jump to content

Tonight (Friday)'s game exclusively on Apple TV


SteveA

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, PHRESH said:

I actually used to switch to the radio audio while watching kinda frequently (via mlbtv app). I used to love listening to Bugel and Manfra over some of the TV crew. 

Tonight would have a good time for that option. 

I miss Manfra. Especially how he dealt with the losing years.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I sat down to watch a replay of the game the next morning (having avoided the score), but after a couple innings I couldn’t take it and just watched the highlights instead. The 1080p picture quality was great, but the constant betting odds on-screen (“chance to strike out: 29%”… riveting), the Zip Recruiter logo digitally imposed on the pitching mound, and Melanie’s nonstop verbal torrent really put me off. I’m sure that’s the future (or present) of sports broadcasts but I resented being forced to watch it that way.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had AppleTV+ alteady so I was able to watch Os in real time for the first time in awhile. I am in a blackout zone and MASN not on cable. I have a vacation house in Myrtle so I can watch it in real time there on MLB.TV  when down there but not here in swVa. Usually though I have had to go back to my childhood transistor radio days and just listen to the audio call.  Back then there was a game on TV maybe once a week, I can watch the replay 90 minute delay on MLB TV 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m not sure if Melanie will ever be good but I think right now her issue is she’s just late on everything. Every time someone hits the ball she will say their name as they make contact, there’s no need for that. Hays crushed that ball and the whole flight of it all she got out was “Austin Hays—“

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually enjoyed the odds that were presented after each pitch.  To me, it highlights the importance of each pitch of each at bat, and how a bad call or a failure of a pitcher to hit their spot by even a few inches can drastically change expected outcomes.  
 

Concerned about Bradish, he’s got good stuff but getting hit pretty hard at the moment.  Kind of reminiscent of Gausman (although Kevin had better raw stuff).  He’s got to improve his control, and his body language out on the mound was poor.  Hopefully he can regain some confidence next start. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, dtk9119 said:

Yup this was one of them. Santander's single that JBJ played on short hop in 9th was also dreadful. 

Based on Melanie's call of that single, I had no idea that the ball wasn't caught.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Emory Eagle said:

I actually enjoyed the odds that were presented after each pitch.  To me, it highlights the importance of each pitch of each at bat, and how a bad call or a failure of a pitcher to hit their spot by even a few inches can drastically change expected outcomes.  
 

Concerned about Bradish, he’s got good stuff but getting hit pretty hard at the moment.  Kind of reminiscent of Gausman (although Kevin had better raw stuff).  He’s got to improve his control, and his body language out on the mound was poor.  Hopefully he can regain some confidence next start. 

He’s a 2 pitch pitcher right now and the fastball command is inconsistent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, rm5678 said:

Based on Melanie's call of that single, I had no idea that the ball wasn't caught.

It was definitely hard to decipher "And there's nothing here...Cedric Mullins comes home!" as the ball was thrown by Bradley in to the infield. For a moment I thought Mullins had been mistaken and was about to get doubled off of third. There was no way to know what was going on either visually (mixer had appropriately switched to a wide-angle cam) or verbally (Newman's discombobulation):

<https://www.mlb.com/gameday/orioles-vs-red-sox/2022/05/27/663276#game_state=final,lock_state=final,game_tab=videos,game=663276>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Emory Eagle said:

I actually enjoyed the odds that were presented after each pitch.  To me, it highlights the importance of each pitch of each at bat, and how a bad call or a failure of a pitcher to hit their spot by even a few inches can drastically change expected outcomes.  
 

Concerned about Bradish, he’s got good stuff but getting hit pretty hard at the moment.  Kind of reminiscent of Gausman (although Kevin had better raw stuff).  He’s got to improve his control, and his body language out on the mound was poor.  Hopefully he can regain some confidence next start. 

He blushes noticeably when in a tough situation. But the four consecutive K's to end the first inning and start the second--after a too-brief rest in the dugout as the O's went down on just 9 pitches--showed some real determination and maturity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, survivedc said:

I’m not sure if Melanie will ever be good but I think right now her issue is she’s just late on everything. Every time someone hits the ball she will say their name as they make contact, there’s no need for that. Hays crushed that ball and the whole flight of it all she got out was “Austin Hays—“

This and the ability to go a minimum of 50-60 words without a pause for breath or observation of what's going on in the game--a total lack of respect for the rhythm of listening to a ballgame--are, to me at least, her most aggravating traits as an announcer. Jim Hunter was annoying but (a) he did pause and breathe regularly and (b) listeners' angst could be channeled through Palmer's acerbic responses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I'm certainly not "fixated" on this. The real issue is the budget. How high will Rubenstein be willing to grow the payroll?
    • It will be retired with the first big $$ free agent or extension signed under Rubenstein.
    • I have no idea what you are arguing. 
    • Cool, nice work there.   So? Are we owed a large market? Does DC not deserve their own team? Should the fans of Baltimore just become Redskins fans and not tried to get their own team when the Colts left?  (sorry to bring up football again but come on, that fits). I laid it all out a couple months ago, MLB has more teams bringing home the hunk of metal than other sports since 2000.  The competitive balance is fine.  It's harder?  Yea?  OK it's harder.
    • The Cowboys have an owner with deep pockets. I agree 100% … There is some cap manipulation that happens. At the end of the day they have a $255 million limit they are required to operate under. The Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc can decide each year how much they want to add to the luxury tax fund as opposed to not being able to fit a potential move under the cap. Here are the 2024 payrolls for the NFL and MLB   https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2024/04/03/mlb-team-payrolls-2024-highest-lowest-mets/73139425007/ Highest $305 million vs $60 million  https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/_/year/2024/sort/cap_maximum_space Highest $259.5 million vs $217 million these numbers will likely get tighter once they make additions before the trade deadline.  If you can’t see the difference I’m just wasting my time. The biggest driving force in MLB beyond the ability of some to spend lavishly is the tv markets. The club controls so much of their tv revenue that it’s an unfair game. The moved that created the Orioles didn’t have much of an effect on the Senators tv market which was likely nonexistent then. Plus MLB is allowing contract manipulation like Othani’s contract. Instead of $700 divided by length 10 years, Somehow he only counts as like $46 million which is laughable. Plus they are paying $85 million in luxury tax fees in 2024.    The Orioles were a large market team when the Expos moved to DC. They could afford to spend with the Yankees, Red Sox , and Blue Jays. Could the Orioles afford to pay $85 million in luxury tax fees? Could the Yankees? I know the answer to both.  What grounds ? Who cares ? The impact was astronomical …It made it very difficult to compete in the AL East without tank a thon! It split their tv market in half. Obviously MLB papered over that long enough to get an agreement done.    They turned a large market team into 2 small/mid market teams. The Orioles and Nationals payrolls combined place them only 11th in baseball. Obviously they could afford to spend more. But it’s doubtful either will ever be top 10 for more than a season  or two as they try to hang onto a window.     
    • Thanks for the detailed explanation of all of the issues.  Sounds like a mess.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...