Jump to content

Heston Kjerstad 2022


joelala

Recommended Posts

  • 4 weeks later...

Today's game still in progress.  Kjerstad with a homer (his 3rd of the season) to left and an RBI single to RF.   Kjerstad started the game in RF and Trimble in LF.   When the CF, Matos, left the game, Kjerstad went to CF instead of Trimble.   Interesting.  Maybe Trimble is banged up.   Maybe the Orioles asked that Kjerstad get some time in CF?    Got me.  Curious though.

It's good to see Kjerstad swinging the bat well but it seems like the level of pitching is A+.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, RZNJ said:

Today's game still in progress.  Kjerstad with a homer (his 3rd of the season) to left and an RBI single to RF.   Kjerstad started the game in RF and Trimble in LF.   When the CF, Matos, left the game, Kjerstad went to CF instead of Trimble.   Interesting.  Maybe Trimble is banged up.   Maybe the Orioles asked that Kjerstad get some time in CF?    Got me.  Curious though.

It's good to see Kjerstad swinging the bat well but it seems like the level of pitching is A+.

Kjerstad also started in CF one day last week.  It’s interesting that he’s seen as capable of playing there.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Kjerstad also started in CF one day last week.  It’s interesting that he’s seen as capable of playing there.   

I remember. This is even more curious because Trimble was a CF in college and played there a lot with Delmarva, yet Kjerstad was the one who moved over when Matos came out of the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

It's a promising sign but I don't read a lot Into what happens with winter ball. 

I have no illusions that Kjerstad is going to be a CF in our system.  But I’ve seen fairly divergent reports about his speed, and this suggests he’s not as slow-footed as some people seem to think.  (Note: Tony gave him a 55 FV on speed last year, so that’s consistent with giving him some work in CF.  Longenhagen  gave him a current grade of 50, future grade of 40.   I remember some 40 grades being thrown around on 2020 draft day, but also some 50’s.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Frobby said:

Kjerstad also started in CF one day last week.  It’s interesting that he’s seen as capable of playing there.   

Just because he's playing there does not mean he's "capable" of playing there effectively, especially in the big leagues. Any outfielder can play CF, it's just a matter of whether they have speed, jumps and routes to play there effectively. Kyle Stowers made 58 starts in CF in the minors for the Orioles. After watching him this year, do you think he should play CF? 

Kjerstad to me looks pretty slow though I haven't timed him. He looks slower than Stowers so I don't think CF is going to be a legitimate option. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • I thought Chisholm missed home too. They didn’t appeal tho I don’t think.
    • Now run scores and Yanks take lead. 
    • Inexcusable missed call in NY. Review Cleo at showed Chisholm out at 2nd. They upheld safe call. 
    • Well, good on posters who proved the SSS side of "Guards Ball." I just found it striking in terms of the narrative in that article, which was basically the same as what most around here were complaining the O's lacked: clutch hitting, passing the baton, aggressive running, getting runners in from third, etc. I guess the real bottom line is "whatever works." Which of course varies from case to case. The old Bill James postseason wisdom was that HRs are the ticket, since you face good pitching and get so few hits. So back to you, Elias, keep crunching those numbers...
    • First, the had a jump in 23’ given how terrible they had been previously, which conditions many fans in the marketplace not to care. They simple weren’t relevant for years. So one very good regular season will not undue years of being bad/irrelevant and treating your customers terribly. Next, I think they missed an opportunity in the offseason by not doing enough by way of big/bold attention grabbing moves. Now I acknowledge that this was most likely due to the ownership flux/transition. I believe they got an attendance/marketplace engagement boost when they changed owners and when they traded for Burnes. However, I believe we would have seen more engagement attendance with say a big Gunnar extension and/or bringing in a big time FA.   IMO this would have created more buzz before the season (say around the time people make season tix decisions - IMO before Christmas is when some people make those bigger purchases). All of this is to say, that it will take time and effort on the organizations part because of how bad of a stain that the Angeloses left. I still have friends and colleagues who refuse to support the Orioles and attend games due to the damage that was done. Rubenstien & co are not going to be able to undo 30 years of awfulness overnight. But IMO it is not enough to simply call it “a new chapter”. They have to make new/different actions to distinguish themselves from who the Orioles were/used to be under the Angelos regime.
    • Just checking in on Gameday, Yankees looking incredibly vulnerable.  Should be the Os out there.  Super lame.  Whichever team wins this series I hope gets knocked out by CLE or DET.
    • If the franchise were better, the fan base would be too.  It’s been a rough 40 years.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...