Jump to content

Watching the Astros


Yossarian

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, Yossarian said:

Pena played 30 games above A ball in the minors.  When you're ready, you're ready. 

He's 24.  That's not young.  Most good players are in the majors by that age.  Almost all HOF non-pitchers* were established as regulars in the MLBs by 25, most earlier.  When Manny was 24 he had played 750 MLB games.

* excepting special cases like segregation, war, MLB not existing yet, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Well since it’s a follow up to my post, my assumption was that he seemingly is saying they are a great organization and overcome losses very well.

Yes, its an organization built on culture.  The Alvarez and Tucker are experiences because they were taught by guys like Springer and Correa (and Altuve and Grienke and Verlander and others).  The guys following Sig and Elias are successful because they were taught by them.  If you build culture for longevity, it's not the people it's the org.  Ie, the Os of the 70s and 80s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

As I said before losing Elias and Sig hasn't slowed them down.

 

Pretty good read here in the Sun about how the Astros are still reaping the benefits of Elias's time there.

https://www.baltimoresun.com/sports/orioles/bs-sp-astros-world-series-mike-elias-roster-orioles-20221028-667wvxykvbdd7avqwtxwqfrbqi-story.html

Didn't realize that he was responsible for drafting Pena as well.

To be fair, good on the new Astros front office for not screwing up the foundation that Elias helped build.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Yossarian said:

While not rookies, Tucker and Alvarez are both 25 years old - same as Pena. They were just brought up sooner and have experience that is helping them in this WS.  The way to get experience is to play. 

To win at a very high level you need to have a blend of the “veterans” like Tucker, Alvarez, and Bregman to go along with a few rookies. Then you need to also have a few older vets that know what it takes to win. You cannot have all of the rookies come up at once and expect to win at a high level. High level meaning really competing for a World Series.

We just opened a five-six year window with Adley and Gunnar. It’s time for Mr. Elias to find the right mix using our payroll flexibility and prospects. All the prospects cannot play and some will struggle. He has built a strong foundation. It’s time to greatly improve the Major League club. 

The Astros have built a juggernaut! Four appearances in the last six years. I’m building a team to go after them. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Watching the Astros it looks like exactly what Elias is trying to do here. Lots of bats through the draft, but if only we could get the international arms that Hou has. They are just absolutely loaded with electric arms. 

Not quite, he's trying to do it with what is probably a much lower ceiling on payroll.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Not quite, he's trying to do it with what is probably a much lower ceiling on payroll.

No doubt.   We probably couldn’t realistically go where Houston has been the last few years (between $158 mm - $217 mm each of the last 6 years).   We were up in the $150 mm - $160 mm area for a short time, but probably couldn’t do that again unless attendance rebounds significantly.  For now, I’d say $130 mm - $150 mm is probably the max we could spend, and that won’t happen for at least a couple of years.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Frobby said:

No doubt.   We probably couldn’t realistically go where Houston has been the last few years (between $158 mm - $217 mm each of the last 6 years).   We were up in the $150 mm - $160 mm area for a short time, but probably couldn’t do that again unless attendance rebounds significantly.  For now, I’d say $130 mm - $150 mm is probably the max we could spend, and that won’t happen for at least a couple of years.  

No need to even spend more than that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sports Guy said:

No need to even spend more than that.

Well, you can have a nice, contending team with a payroll in the $130-150 mm range, no doubt.   Building a perennial juggernaut like the Astros might not be possible, though.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frobby said:

Well, you can have a nice, contending team with a payroll in the $130-150 mm range, no doubt.   Building a perennial juggernaut like the Astros might not be possible, though.  

Ehh, I disagree.  Their OD payroll hasn’t eclipsed 190M and at its peak, they had guys you really don’t need to contend making big money.

Its possible they payroll could spike to 165ish a year here or there just because of arb raises but basically, if you can’t perennially contend with 150M, you aren’t good at your job.

Look at Tamp as exhibit A.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Holliday went 1 for 2 with 3 walks on Friday night. 2024: .444 OBP, .911 OPS MiLB Career: .447 OBP, .931 OPS His OBP is EXACTLY what this O's team needs, would fill a key offensive weakness at 2nd base, help grind opposing pitching, and magnify the power up and down the lineup.  It's all dependent on his ability to throw and play 2B at a passable level. If Holliday starts to hit at the ML level, the question of who bats leadoff is over for the foreseeable future and we can go back to complaining about 1 slumping hitter or backup catcher at the bottom of the lineup.
    • This. We literally have no lineup holes right now, and Mayo, Norby, Jax lurk. Any trade discussion should center around the four most essential and crucial elements to O's success for the balance of the regular season and playoffs: 1. pitching 2. pitching 3. pitching 4. damn, forgot the 4th one. oh yeah, its pitching.
    • All I know is that Suárez has earned at least one more start, after today.
    • Scherzer still looks like a guy who would be a nice add to our rotation in the second half if the Rangers are sellers. 
    • Not happening. I don’t disagree, but Kremer will be slotted in the rotation.
    • I wouldn’t either but the word here is that he’s going back to rotation . Suarez supposedly the one  to be moved to bullpen . I think they should wait and see if Irvin can rebound . If Irvin can’t match Suarez’s work, then he should be moved to bullpen 
    • Yes that’s what I was asking. COC was completely off base in his comment. Judge is a great player, and apparently a nice guy. I have nothing against him, or most Yankees, for that matter, though Gil’s tats are off putting. I am expecting a bit of pro Yankee bias, but that’s ok. Also, home runs is a very glittery stat, and might sway some folks. But it should be Gunnar, at least based on the first 81.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...